Loading clinical trials...
Discover 19,050 clinical trials near Georgia. Find research studies in your area.
Browse by condition:
Showing 1261-1280 of 19,050 trials
NCT05567796
This study has 2 parts: First part is the main study and second part is the extension study. During the main study participants will receive 1 of 4 study medicines. If participants continue in the extension study, they will not receive any study medicine during the extension. The main study will look at how well CagriSema helps participants with excess body weight lose weight compared to a "dummy" medicine and 2 other medicines, cagrilintide and semaglutide. Participants will either get CagriSema, cagrilintide,semaglutide or "dummy" medicine. Which treatment participants get is decided by chance. They will take one injection once a week. The study medicine is injected briefly with a thin needle, typically in the stomach, thighs or upper arms. Extension study: After the main study, not all participants will continue in the extension study. The study staff will tell the participant if they will continue or not into the extension study. In the extension study we will look at what happens to the participant's body weight and diseases related to excess body weight after the participant stops taking the study medicine. The main study will last for about 1½ years and the extension study will last for another 2 years.
NCT07111663
This is an observational study in individuals with isolated (or primary) dystonia that involves more than one body region. The purpose of the study is to collect detailed information to help your physician and other researchers understand how dystonia impacts your and other patients' lives and how the disease changes over time. The study may also help researchers better understand the clinical scales that are commonly used to evaluate dystonia symptoms and how they affect various areas of life such as well-being, pain, relationships and social interactions, and progress over time. Because this is an observational study, you will not receive any interventional treatment in the study.
NCT07076121
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of BMS-986504, a selective, MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor, in combination with Nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine (nab-p/gem) versus placebo in combination with nab-p/gem, in participants with untreated metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with homozygous methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deletion.
NCT05422222
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and efficacy of VX-121/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor (VX-121/TEZ/D-IVA) in CF participants with at least 1 triple combination responsive (TCR) mutation in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene.
NCT06510374
A phase 3b, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Nadofaragene Firadenovec vs. Observation in Participants with Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (IR NMIBC)
NCT05477576
This study aims to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended Phase 3 dose (RP3D) of RYZ101 in Part 1, and the safety, efficacy, and PK of RYZ101 compared with investigator-selected standard of care (SoC) therapy in Part 2 in subjects with inoperable, advanced, well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor expressing (SSTR+) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) that have progressed following treatment with Lutetium 177-labelled somatostatin analogue (177Lu-SSA) therapy, such as 177Lu-DOTATATE or 177Lu-DOTATOC (177Lu-DOTATATE/TOC), or 177Lu-high affinity \[HA\]-DOTATATE.
NCT06113471
This study is being conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of povorcitinib in participants with nonsegmental vitiligo.
NCT01522976
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well azacitidine works with or without lenalidomide or vorinostat in treating patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Lenalidomide may stop the growth of cancer cells by stopping blood flow to the cancer. Vorinostat may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether azacitidine is more effective with or without lenalidomide or vorinostat in treating myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
NCT04252742
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the treatment benefit of erenumab on headache duration of at least moderate pain intensity.
NCT05156281
To compare the efficacy and safety of remibrutinib versus teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)
NCT07187973
This is an open-label, multicenter, within-participant dose-escalation study examining up to 3 dose levels of DISC-3405 and will assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of DISC 3405 in participants with sickle cell disease.
NCT04852783
The purpose of this trial is to gather data on the safety and effectiveness of the Contour /Contour 021 System in the treatment of wide-necked bifurcated saccular, intracranial aneurysms for submission to FDA in support of a premarket approval application for the device.
NCT06996782
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of multiple study interventions including novel-novel combinations or novel agents in combination with standard therapy for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC.
NCT04197934
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of WSD0922-FU for the treatment of glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, or non-small cell lung cancer that has spread to the central nervous system (central nervous system metastases). WSD0922-FU is a targeted treatment which blocks the EGFR protein - a strategy that has led to a lot of benefit in patients with many different cancers. WSD0922-FU may also be able to get into cancers in the brain and spinal cord and help patients with brain and spinal cord cancers. Funding Source - FDA OOPD
NCT04930094
This is a phase III study of efficacy and safety of secukinumab versus placebo, in combination with glucocorticoid taper regimen, in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA)
NCT04345614
Part 1 of this trial enrolled 30 patients to receive Auxora (formerly CM4620) in a 2:1 randomized, open label trial of patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Part 2 of this study randomized 284 patients and was a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled (RCT) study that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and the pharmacokinetic profile of Auxora in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The number of patients with an imputed PaO2/FiO2 \>200 randomized into the study was capped at 26. Another 258 patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 were enrolled. Patients with an estimated PaO2/FiO2 of 75-200 were stratified to ensure balanced randomization between the Auxora and placebo arms. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore how time to recovery is influenced by baseline variables and to evaluate the treatment effect at different levels of each of these variables. The dose of Auxora was 2.0 mg/kg (1.25 mL/kg) administered at 0 hour, and then 1.6 mg/kg (1 mL/kg) at 24 hours and 1.6 mg/kg (1 mL/kg) at 48 hours from the SFISD. The dose of placebo was 1.25 mL/kg administered at 0 hour and then 1 mL/kg at 24 hours and 1 mL/kg at 48 hours from the SFISD. Remdesivir, corticosteroids and convalescent plasma were allowed. The infusion of Auxora / Placebo started within 12 hours from the time the patient or LAR provided informed consent. Efficacy analyses will be presented by treatment group (Auxora vs Placebo) based on the Efficacy Analysis Set of the imputed PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 subgroup, except where it is specified otherwise. The statistical analysis approach was designed to assess the significance of the primary and first secondary endpoint using the Benjamini and Hochberg method to control the overall trial level alpha level.
NCT03401190
This open-label, dose-response study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of CM4620-IE in patients with acute pancreatitis and accompanying SIRS. The study will consist of two phases. The first phase will consist of 4 female and 4 male patients (cohorts 1 and 2, respectively), enrolled concurrently, randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive CM4620-IE plus standard of care versus standard of care alone. Planned doses for first phase will be CM4620-IE 1.0 mg/kg on Day 1 and then 1.4 mg/kg on Days 2 - 4. The second phase will consist of 8 female and 8 male patients (cohorts 3 and 4, respectively), enrolled concurrently, randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive CM4620-IE plus standard of care versus standard of care alone. Planned doses for second phase will be CM4620-IE 2.08 mg/kg on Days 1 and 2 and then 1.6 mg/kg on Days 3 and 4. Dose escalation to second phase would only occur if needed for efficacy reasons and if no events suggesting a safety signal would occur with higher dosing. The study is not powered for the analysis of study data with inferential statisitcs as the primary purpose of the study is to explore what endpoints would be most appropriate for future trials.
NCT02216227
The goals of this project are 1) to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the checklist to prevent MRSA SSIs among Veterans undergoing TJA or cardiac surgery, and 2) to assess barriers and facilitators to checklist implementation. Hypotheses: 1. The SSI checklist will be effective at reducing MRSA SSIs among total joint arthroplasty and cardiac surgery patients. 2. Implementation of the checklist will be associated with an overall reduction in SSIs caused by all pathogens. 3. The SSI Checklist will be cost-saving since it will prevent many expensive SSIs. 4. Preoperative MRSA testing will be a modifiable barrier to implementing the SSI checklist.
NCT07126262
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daily administration of vosoritide in participants with HCH aged 0 to \< 36 months over a 52-week period.
NCT05109975
This study has two parts: Part 1 and Part 2. The purpose of this study in Part 1, Dose Escalation Part is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of Debio 0123 as monotherapy with repeated dosing in adults with advanced solid tumors that recurred or progressed after prior therapy and/or for whom no standard therapy of proven benefit is available. The purpose in Part 2, Expansion Part of this study, is to characterize the safety and tolerability of Debio 0123 in each study arm and overall when administered as monotherapy at the MTD/RP2D determined during the Dose Escalation Part 1 and to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of Debio 0123 when administered as monotherapy to participants in each study arm.
