Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation vs Sham in Established Responders

Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of adults and is often resistant to conventional drug therapy. The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) has emerged as an important therapeutic target, as abnormal firing in DRG neurons contributes to peripheral and central sensitization. DRG stimulation (DRGS) delivers mild electrical pulses through implanted leads placed near the DRG. Compared with traditional spinal cord stimulation, DRGS provides highly targeted pain relief with fewer unwanted sensations. Over the past decade, DRGS has become an established treatment for conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), causalgia, chronic low back pain, and post-surgical neuropathic pain. Modern programming favors sub-threshold settings, in which stimulation is delivered below the level that causes tingling sensations (paresthesias). Although widely adopted, the specific contribution of sub-threshold stimulation has never been confirmed in a sham-controlled trial. This study is the first randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to directly evaluate whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo. Adults with an implanted DRG stimulator who have shown sustained pain relief will be randomized in a two-period crossover design to receive either active sub-threshold stimulation or sham stimulation, each for 5 days, with a washout period in between. The primary objective is to determine whether sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduces mean daily pain intensity compared with sham. Secondary objectives include assessing sleep quality, mood, daily activity, and safety/tolerability. Exploratory measures include device logs and rescue medication use. The findings of this trial will provide critical evidence on the efficacy of sub-threshold DRG stimulation, helping to inform clinical guidelines, payer decisions, and neuromodulation programming strategies worldwide.