Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 56 trials
NCT07251101
This single-center study at CHA Ilsan Medical Center compares intraoperative hemodynamics between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery requiring pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning.
NCT07459517
Peripheral intravenous catheterization (PIVC) is a frequently performed invasive procedure in pediatric emergency departments and is often associated with fear and distress in children. Children with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) may require multiple attempts for successful catheterization, which can increase fear, anxiety, and procedure time. Non-pharmacological distraction techniques are commonly used to reduce procedural distress in children. This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effect of a musical-moving toy used as a distraction method during peripheral intravenous catheterization on children's fear levels, procedure success, and procedure duration. The study will be conducted in the pediatric emergency department of Antalya City Hospital in Türkiye. Children aged 4-6 years with difficult intravenous access will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. In the intervention group, a musical-moving toy will be used during the catheterization procedure to distract the child, while the control group will receive standard care without the toy. Fear levels will be measured using the Children's Fear Scale. Procedure success will be evaluated by the number of attempts required to successfully insert the catheter, and procedure duration will be recorded using a stopwatch. The findings of this study may contribute to improving pediatric procedural care by providing an effective, low-cost, and easily applicable distraction method during intravenous catheterization.
NCT07389798
This study plans to categorize patients who underwent short-duration ENT surgeries with remimazolam TIVA combined with flumazenil antagonism based on whether their intraoperative BIS values were maintained below 60.
NCT06668766
Many patients in the emergency department have veins that are difficult to get an intrevenous (IV) catheter into (called "difficult IV access"). These patients may require other methods to obtain access to a vein for administration of the necessary medications. The 2-inch long IV is most commonly used in emergency departments for people with difficulty IV access. Typically, a healthcare worker will use an ultrasound to help to see the veins underneath the skin while inserting the IV into the vein. That is, the ultrasound helps the healthcare worker visualize veins that are deeper in the arm and may not be felt through the skin. Another device that can be used is a 4-inch midline catheter. This device is less commonly used as many emergency departments do not have participants available, but it serves the same purpose as the 2-inch long IVs (that is, to give medicine into the vein and sometimes to take blood). A 4-inch midline catheter is similar to a 2-inch long IV, but has a few differences. First, the 4-inch midline catheter is even longer than the 2-inch long IV. The 4-inch midline catheter is 10-cm (about 4-inches or the size of 4 quarters side-by-side), while the 2-inch long IV is 4.78-cm (nearly 2-inches or two quarters side-by-side). Second, the 4-inch midline catheter is inserted into using a guidewire to help move the catheter in the vein (similar in concept to a train moving along a track), while the 2-inch long IV does not have this guidewire. The guidewire does not hurt and most do not know it is being used. It is just an additional step to help guide the catheter in the vein. The investigators are conducting this research study to determine which catheter is better for patients with difficult IV access: the 4-inch midline catheter or the 2-inch long IV.
NCT06632496
This post-market study is being conducted to generate safety and performance data on the BD Prevue(TM) II Peripheral Vascular Access System with Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology. The data will be utilized to support regional registrations (for example, EU MDR), and document any unforeseen residual risks.
NCT02527083
Research suggests that the type of anesthesia used for surgery may affect intraoperative stress hormone levels. There is also data to support that an increased level of stress hormones leads to increased pain after surgery. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effect of anesthesia type on long term pain after hernia surgery. In this study, patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair will be randomized to an anesthetic group, either Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) maintained with propofol or Balanced Inhaled Anesthesia (BIA) maintained with sevoflurane. This will allow us to look at any differences in short and long-term pain after hernia repair depending on type of anesthesia received.
NCT07275801
This prospective observational study evaluates the feasibility and clinical utility of AI-enhanced continuous respiratory sound monitoring during intravenous anesthesia with supraglottic airway placement. With the increasing volume of surgical procedures requiring anesthesia, continuous respiratory monitoring has become essential. While standard monitors track anesthetic depth, end-tidal CO₂, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate, real-time respiratory sound analysis offers additional clinical value. This study aims to verify whether continuous respiratory sound monitoring using the Airmod electronic stethoscope can detect respiratory depression and airway obstruction before hypoxemia develops, thereby improving the safety of supraglottic airway anesthesia. The protocol involves collecting 60 patients undergoing elective breast surgery with supraglottic airway anesthesia (inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, BMI \<35; exclusion criteria: emergency cases, anticipated difficult airways, age \<18, BMI \>35). During surgery, an electronic stethoscope patch provides continuous respiratory sound recording, converted to spectral data and analyzed by artificial intelligence, while standard anesthetic monitoring includes blood pressure, heart rate, bispectral index (BIS), SpO₂, and EtCO₂. Researchers document specific intraoperative events including airway positioning, oxygen flow adjustments, ventilation parameter changes, oxygen desaturation episodes, and abnormalities detected via auscultation. Anesthetic records, surgical notes, and recovery records are compiled in Excel format integrated with electronic medical records, with statistical analysis performed using SigmaPlot software. This research builds upon the Airmod electronic stethoscope approved for marketing in February 2025, aiming to establish device-specific respiratory monitoring protocols while enhancing patient safety during non-intubated anesthesia procedures.
NCT06237101
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether remifentanil has a facilitating effect on the generation of burst suppression by propofol in adult patients (18-60 years) candidates for elective surgery who require remifentanil and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I or II. The main question it aims to answer are: • To determine whether remifentanil has a facilitating effect on the generation of burst suppression by propofol. Participants will undergo general anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol sequentially. After loss of consciousness, remifentanil will be adjusted to a medium or high concentration randomly and it will be determined at what concentration of propofol the burst suppressions are generated. Then, the concentrations of propofol that generate burst suppression associated with either a medium or high concentration of remifentanil will be compared.
NCT05072236
Cough is the most unwanted response during bronchoscopic interventions for hemodynamic instability, hypoxemia, and interruption of interventions. Topical lidocaine is recommended with a grade evidence in British Thoracic Society guideline. However, severe cough often induces during the initial bronchoscopic spraying of local anesthesia, follows with uneven spraying, spasm or arrythmias. In previous reports, there were many drugs and techniques investigated for preventing cough during broncoscopic spraying. As bronchoscopic interventions need more space and stability of airways to precisely operate on, few studies have focused on the effects of different drugs for preventing cough. In this study, Different intravenous drugs (lidocaine, alfentanil, compared to normal saline) is planned to be injected one minutes before bronchoscopic insertion, the responses to bronchoscopicly spraying local anestheticsuch as cough intensity, BIS levels, ANI, Transdermal O2 and CO2, respiration were recorded and analyzed.
NCT06719869
Intravenous access is a necessity for nearly all inpatient medical care. Approximately half of hospitalized patients require a peripheral venous catheter (PVC), either to enable administration of medications intravenously or to repeatedly draw blood samples (1). Establishing a venous access sometimes requires repeated attempts, resulting in multiple needle sticks and prolonged discomfort for patients. In addition, this may lead to a diminished healthcare experience and create a stressful situation for both patients and healthcare personnel (2, 3). Delays in establishing intravenous access can result in setbacks in sample collection and drug administration (4, 5). Difficult Intravenous Access (DIVA) is a situation that arises "when two or more clinicians fail two or more times to establish a peripheral access using conventional techniques, when a patient lacks visible or palpable veins or the patient has a stated or documented history of DIVA" (6). The prevalence of DIVA varies from 6% to 88% in different studies, primarily due to variations in definition of DIVA. Known risk factors are diabetes, intravenous drug abuse, sex (higher risk for women), chronic illness, obesity, malnutrition, absence of visible or palpable veins (7, 8). Although it is possible to establish a short, standard-length PVC through the help of ultrasound-guidance, this approach has limited scientific support (4, 9-11). In addition, ultrasound-guided PVCs are not health economically justifiable (12). There are a handful of alternatives in terms of vascular access devices (VAD) for DIVA patients: Standard short PVC, Midline catheter, Central Venous Catheter (CVC) and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC). A Midline is a long (8-12 cm), peripherally inserted venous catheter that is most commonly inserted into the upper arm via the basilic, cephalic or brachial veins, with its tip terminating below the level of the axilla (13). A Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is inserted through one of several veins (subclavian, jugular, or femoral) and terminates in a central vein, typically the superior vena cava, right atrium, or the iliac/inferior vena cava, depending on the insertion site. A PICC is an extended venous catheter inserted peripherally, similar to the Midline, inserted through the veins of the upper arm. However, the PICC terminates centrally, in the superior vena cava. There is some existing evidence supporting that Midline catheters could be safer compared to PICCs in short term (14-16). Today, CVCs are standard of care in many centers, but retrospective data indicate that Midlines could be a feasible option in DIVA patients (17). Furthermore, CVC insertion involves certain risks, such as arterial puncture, hematoma or pneumothorax (18). For DIVA patients in need of venous access for 5 days or more, Midlines are preferred as per the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) guidelines (13). However, there are no randomized controlled clinical trials comparing Midlines to CVCs in DIVA patients. Primary aim of study The aim of the study is to test the feasibility of the study protocol before a future large-scale RCT.
NCT07184489
The goal of this implementation study is to learn if the CFIR-ERIC matching tool is effective indeveloping implementation strategies for pediatric nurse. The evidence practised in this study is the pediatric venous access device selection decision tree from clinical practice guideline on infusion therapy in children. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the implementation strategies developed by CFIR-ERIC matching tool improve nurses knowledge in venous access devices selection. 2. Does the implementation strategies developed by CFIR-ERIC matching tool lower the error rate of appropriate venous access device selection. Researchers will compare the CFIR-ERIC group to a blank group to see if CIFR-ERIC matching tool works to improve nurses knowleged and lower the error rate of venous access device selection. Participants will: 1. Receive the implementation strategies made by CFIR-ERIC matching tool. 2. Using the pediatric venous access device selection decision trees in daily catheterization. 3. Record their venous access device selection informantion, consumables usage and pediatric patients' outcome.
NCT06905119
The study focuses on patients who require outpatient infusion of therapy ("Infusions, Intravenous"\[Mesh\]) "Administration, Intravenous"\[Mesh\] ("Home Infusion Therapy"\[Mesh\]) "Parenteral Nutrition, Home"\[Mesh\] via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) ("Central Venous Catheters"\[MeSH\] "Catheterization, Central Venous"\[MeSH\] "Catheterization, Peripheral" \[MeSH\] "Vascular Access Devices"\[Mesh\] )
NCT06835712
Aim: The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of virtual reality and guided imagery to reduce pain during peripheral intravenous catheterization procedures in adults.Methods: The study will include 90 adults who were randomly selected between February and March 2025. One application group (n=30) will receive a virtual reality glasses application; the other application group (n=30) will receive a guided imagery application. The applications to the site of the peripheral intravenous catheterization will last two minutes. The control group (n=30) will receive the standard peripheral intravenous catheterization application procedure. The groups' level of pain during catheterization will be assessed using a visual analog scale.
NCT06772259
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of two different non-pharmacologic interventions with the control group in reducing pain due to peripheral intravenous catheterization application in children aged 5-12 years. Hypotheses: H1: Pain level differs in the group that received PIK with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group. H2: The level of fear in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator differs from the control group. H3: Satisfaction level is different in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group. H4: The pain level differs in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H5: The level of fear is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H6: Satisfaction level is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H7: Pain level is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group. H8: The level of fear is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group. H9: The satisfaction level in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator is different from the cartoon group. H10: PIK application time is different in the palm stimulator group compared to the control group. H11: PIK application time is different in the cartoon group compared to the co
NCT06685770
In this prospective study, the effects of different anesthesia methods (total intravenous anesthesia and inhaled anesthesia) on neurocognitive function will be examined in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without axillary lymph node dissection. Mini-Mental State Examination and Mini-Cog tests will be administered at specific intervals pre and postoperatively. Anesthesia management will follow standard protocols, and the researcher will not intervent in these processes. The relationship between the type of anesthesia and neurocognitive outcomes will be evaluated based on the collected data.
NCT03864094
In this trial the investigators want to examine if there is any difference in hemodynamic stability when giving equipotent prophylactic injections of ephedrine 0,1 mg/kg, phenylephrine 1 microg/kg, norepinephrine 0,1 microg/kg or sodium chloride (NaCl) 9 mg/ml during induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.
NCT05951686
The goal of this randomized controlled single blinded study is to compare the effect of the type of anesthesia on gastrointestinal motility in patients scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The main question it aims to answer is how do inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia effect the gastrointestinal peristalsis during anastomosis. Participants will be American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status II and III, between 18- 60 ages. Researchers will compare inhalation anesthesia where desflurane is used with total intravenous anesthesia to see if the gastrointestinal motility differs between the groups.
NCT04865783
This trial aims to evaluate if cryospray can reduce pain during intravenous cannulation in elective surgery compared to a placebo spray.
NCT04048226
* This is a prospective randomized double blind controlled study. * Female patients undergoing radical mastectomy will be included in this study where they will be randomly allocated into; - Control group in which patients will receive continuous infusion of normal saline. Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine group in which patients will receive continuous infusion of ketamine and dexmedetomidine. The intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption will be measured. Also, the postoperative pain score and the incidence of chronic pain will be assessed.
NCT06233214
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIC) application in pediatric wards of hospitals; It is used in the administration of drugs that require diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration or high serum concentration, resistant infections, parenteral treatments, continuous bolus analgesic needs and emergency treatment situations. Although PIC is a frequently used practice, especially in pediatric emergency departments, it is seen as a difficult approach for healthcare professionals. PIC applications may be more difficult in pediatric patients due to their small vascular structures, the fact that the vessels are surrounded by subcutaneous tissue, and lack of communication. Every child's venous anatomy is different. Therefore, selecting the appropriate vein by ensuring palpation and using appropriate tools before the procedure will reduce the pain and stress the child will experience. Biomedical tools are used to increase success in vascular interventions. Studies have shown that PIC procedure time is shorter in pediatric patients using vein imaging devices and the number of interventions is lower than the control group.