Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 1,659 trials
NCT03854253
This study evaluates estimate impact of introducers length during endovascular coronary procedures on rate of a radial artery occlusion. For half of participants will use short introducers, while for other will use long introducers during transradial coronary intervention.
NCT04931771
The FAST III is a randomized controlled, open-label, multicenter, international, non-inferiority, strategy trial. A total of 2228 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either vFFR- or FFR guided revascularization. Patients will be consented prior to the procedure and then followed up to 12 (+1) months after randomization. The primary endpoint is analyzed at 12 months after randomization. Approximately 35 sites in 7 European countries (Netherlands, Ireland, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and France).
NCT07660419
This single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile internet-based, home-based cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with mild to moderate coronary artery stenosis. A total of 176 eligible participants will be randomized to receive either a personalized lifestyle intervention via a mobile platform or routine clinical care. The primary endpoint is the change in non-calcified coronary plaque volume, as measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 12 months. Participants will be followed for a total of 36 months to comprehensively assess the long-term impact of this digital lifestyle intervention on plaque progression and cardiovascular outcomes.
NCT06885177
A prospective, single-arm, open-label, multi-center IDE study with up to 55 US sites
NCT06713239
PARAMOUNT is a prospective randomized open-label trial testing the hypothesis that a personalized management strategy in symptomatic patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD), using a CT-based coronary atherosclerotic plaque assessment by AI-enabled quantitative software improves: certainty for diagnosis of CAD, control of CAD risk factors and efficiency of ICA referral with appropriate PCI compared to the usual care strategy based on current AHA/ACC guidelines for care of symptomatic patients with suspicion of CAD.
NCT06779630
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Orsiro® Mission 48- mm Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the treatment of subjects with atherosclerotic lesion(s) \>36 mm and ≤ 44 mm in length (by visual estimate) in the native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter of 2.25 mm to 4.0 mm. Patients enrolled in the United States will be followed for 2 years post index procedure with follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12 months and 2 years post index procedure. Patients enrolled outside of the United States will be followed through 5 years post index procedure with additional follow-up visits at 3 and 5 years post index procedure.
NCT02890160
The FUTURE-II study is a confirmative clinical trial for Sirolimus Target Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Firesorb) after the feasibility and safety of the device has been preliminary confirmed in a small-scale First-in-Man clinical trial.
NCT07565805
Bern Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Registry (BIOCORE) is a systematic institutional registry on patients undergoing paired CCTA and OCT for validation and development of advanced methods to determine coronary plaque morphology, lesion severity, PCI guidance, and it association with long-term clinical outcomes.
NCT04614467
This clinical trial will explore the efficacy and safety of GCSF-mobilized autologous CD34+ cells for the treatment of CMD in adults currently experiencing angina and with no obstructive coronary artery disease. Eligible subjects will receive a single administration of CLBS16 or placebo.
NCT07560436
HFpEF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) is a condition in which the heart muscle becomes stiff and can't pump blood properly. People living with HFpEF also often have coronary artery disease, where the blood vessels that supply the heart are narrowed or blocked. It is not yet know whether opening these arteries with stents improves symptoms or quality of life with HFpEF. REPRIEVED is a randomised clinical trial that aims to find out if heart stents can improve quality of life for people living with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and coronary artery disease. Researchers will compare two groups of people; those who have a stent procedure to those who have a placebo procedure. The placebo procedure feels the same as a stent procedure but does not include a stent. 350 people with HFpEF and coronary artery disease will be asked to take part. Participants will be monitored over a period of 6 months to see if and how quality of life changes. Before the procedure, participants will be asked to complete a short health questionnaire, have a blood test, undergo an electrocardiogram (heart tracing) and scans of their heart. On the day of the procedure, the participant will come to the hospital for an angiogram and will be randomly allocated to have either treatment with a stent or the placebo procedure without a stent. Participants will not know whether they have received heart stents. This helps researchers know that any improvements in their quality of life are not just related to how they feel about the stenting treatment. Participants will then be contacted by a member of the research team at 3 months and 6 months after their procedure. At 3 months, participants will complete a short health questionnaire either by phone or during a hospital visit. At 6 months, participants will attend the hospital to complete a short health questionnaire, have blood tests, a scan of the heart (echocardiogram) and an electrocardiogram (heart tracing) to measure any changes in the heart. Participants will be told whether they received the stent procedure or the placebo procedure.
NCT03507205
The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of coronary stenting with the various types of drug-eluting stents (DES) and to determine clinical device and procedural success during commercial use of DES in the real world. The investigators will compare EES (Xience V/Promus and Xience Prime), SES (Cypher), ZES (Resolute Integrity, Endeavor Resolute, Endeavor), and BES (Biomatrix, Biomatrix Flex, and Nobori).
NCT07324720
1. Study Purpose This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between two revascularization strategies in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease and 50-90% angiographic stenosis: a plaque burden and vulnerability-based revascularization strategy guided by intravascular imaging versus an ischemia-based revascularization strategy guided by physiologic assessment. 2. Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in conjunction with optimal medical therapy, is one of the main therapeutic strategies for improving outcomes in patients with CAD. To enhance the results of PCI, various diagnostic and adjunctive techniques have been developed-most notably, invasive physiologic assessment and intravascular imaging (IVI). Invasive physiologic indices such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are recognized as the most accurate methods to determine vessel-level myocardial ischemia, and current guidelines recommend PCI based on these physiological measurements. Recently, angiography-derived FFR has also been developed, allowing ischemia assessment without pressure wire measurement, and has been endorsed as a useful tool for guiding PCI decisions. Intravascular imaging, on the other hand, provides detailed anatomical insights into atherosclerotic plaque morphology and plays a critical role in achieving procedural optimization. Current guidelines recommend the use of IVI, particularly in the treatment of complex lesions. While most previous IVI studies have focused on procedural optimization, more recent investigations have begun to explore the use of IVI for PCI decision-making itself. Emerging data suggest that revascularization decisions based on quantitative and qualitative plaque assessment using IVI are non-inferior to those based on invasive physiologic testing. Moreover, IVI enables the identification of vulnerable plaques, and studies indicate that intervening on such lesions may improve outcomes. At present, a physiology-guided decision-making strategy combined with IVI-guided optimization is considered the best evidence-based approach according to guidelines. However, recent data showing the potential advantages of IVI-guided decision-making and IVI-guided optimization-particularly in high-risk, complex patients and in those with vulnerable plaque morphology-suggest that IVI-based strategies may offer greater clinical benefit in such populations. Despite this, a comprehensive strategy that integrates both quantitative (plaque burden) and qualitative (vulnerability) aspects of plaque evaluation via IVI has yet to be clearly established. Therefore, this study seeks to propose IVI-based quantitative and qualitative criteria for high-risk CAD patients and to compare outcomes between a plaque burden and vulnerability-based revascularization strategy and the conventional ischemia-based revascularization strategy. For all patients undergoing PCI, IVI-guided optimization will be performed to ensure the highest possible procedural quality in both groups. 3. Study Procedures Patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected or known CAD will be screened for eligibility. After providing a detailed explanation of the study, written informed consent will be obtained from those deemed appropriate for participation. Following coronary angiography, patients with significant coronary stenosis who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Eligible participants will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the plaque burden and vulnerability-based revascularization group or the ischemia-based revascularization group. Stratified randomization will be performed according to participating center and presence or absence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to ensure balance between the groups.
NCT07548554
Despite all advances in diagnostic and therapeutic methods over the past century, ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. IHD develops as a result of reversible or irreversible impairment of myocardial perfusion in acute or chronic settings. This perfusion abnormality most commonly arises from compromise of epicardial coronary artery patency due to stenosis, occlusion, or vasomotor abnormalities. Structural and/or functional alterations in the microcirculation may also contribute to impaired myocardial perfusion. Conditions in which myocardial perfusion is acutely compromised are classified as acute coronary syndromes (ACS), whereas reversible ischemia developing on a chronic basis is evaluated under the umbrella of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). In the assessment of epicardial (macrovascular) or microvascular pathologies leading to ischemia in CCS, angiography, a macroscopic lumenographic method, is often insufficient. Intracoronary pressure and flow measurements are required to determine the impact of angiographically detected epicardial lesions on coronary blood flow, perfusion pressure, and consequently myocardial perfusion. These measurements are referred to as invasive intracoronary physiology (IIP). Current guidelines recommend that decisions regarding revascularization of intermediate epicardial lesions should be based on IIP. Revascularization guided by IIP is associated with reduced mortality and morbidity, along with a lower stent burden. IIP can be performed using pressure-based, flow-based, or combined strategies. Recent multinational studies indicate that strategies integrating both flow and pressure parameters achieve better clinical outcomes with fewer interventions and reduced stent implantation compared to pressure-only approaches. Indeed, in cases where coronary flow and flow reserve are preserved, abnormalities in pressure parameters alone may not justify revascularization. Nevertheless, lesions deemed not to be associated with reversible ischemia based on IIP may still pose a risk due to plaque erosion/rupture and subsequent thrombotic cascades that can acutely compromise the lumen. Many acute coronary syndromes arise from lesions that are hemodynamically insignificant (i.e., do not affect flow) and unrelated to reversible ischemia in the CCS setting, but which undergo sudden near-total or total occlusion. The histopathological characteristics of any coronary lesion can be evaluated using intracoronary imaging techniques. Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography (IC-OCT) is a high-resolution, real-time imaging modality that quantitatively assesses lipid-rich plaque content, evaluates the thickness and stability of the fibrous cap separating this content from the lumen, and provides detailed information regarding minimal lumen area, lesion morphology, surface characteristics, presence of erosion, and plaque vulnerability to rupture. IC-OCT can identify lesions that are hemodynamically insignificant yet may benefit from revascularization and have the potential to cause ACS. Combined evaluation using IC-OCT and IIP enables an integrated assessment of both the relationship with chronic reversible perfusion impairment and the risk of precipitating ACS for each lesion and coronary segment, thereby facilitating optimal revascularization strategies. Despite the available evidence and guideline recommendations in CCS, the use of IC-OCT and IIP in the context of ACS remains limited due to procedural challenges and variability in practical application. These methods are not routinely recommended in guidelines and, in some cases, are even discouraged. However, the optimal strategy for revascularization of non-culprit lesions in ACS remains uncertain, and no consensus has yet been established. Patients with ACS are at increased risk for recurrent events arising from all coronary lesions. Therefore, accurate evaluation and preventive revascularization strategies for these lesions are expected to provide substantial benefit. Our study aims to reclassify and characterize non-culprit lesions in patients with ACS using combined IC-OCT and IIP assessment.
NCT07329699
The AIM-FFR trial is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. The current trial will evaluate non-inferiority of MPFFR-guided PCI, compared with invasive FFR-guided PCI in patients with coronary artery disease.
NCT07422688
The purpose is to investigate if a strategy of routine OCT based diagnosis and guidance of PCI improves clinical outcomes compared with a standard strategy of guidance by angiography in patients presenting with ACS
NCT03443999
The primary objective of this registry is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Supraflex Family sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system in a 'real-world' patient population requiring stent implantation.
NCT06863155
Patients receiving chronic oral anticoagulation with indication for percutaneous coronary revascularization with stent implantation, and needing for antiplatelet therapy, are at high risk of bleeding. The new generation of ultrathin strut sirolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer allow for shorter antiplatelets regimens and could be a good option for this high-bleeding risk patients.
NCT05788432
Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Sequent Please Neo to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the consecutive patients treated with Sequent Please Neo.
NCT07536607
For patients with severe calcification or complex non-calcified plaques, we investigate wether PCCT can enable non-invasive, in vivo precise differentiation and quantitative measurement of plaque components (e.g., spotty calcification, necrotic core, fibrous tissue). Further we also study wether these quantitative imaging features can independently predict the risk of MACE in the short term and long term
NCT05417893
This is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and performance of MeRes100 Sirolimus-eluting BioResorbable Vascular Scaffold System versus Contemporary drug-eluting stent platforms in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions at 60 investigational sites globally (including India). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate safety and performance of MeRes100 BRS in comparison with XIENCE family EES/Resolute ZES/Synergy EES/BioMime/Metafor/Proficient family SES in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with reference vessel diameter of ≥2.75 mm to ≤4.0 mm and lesion length ≤34 mm. Subject's Clinical/Telephonic Follow-up will be taken at \[Time Frame: 30 days (± 7 days) clinical follow-up, 6 month (± 28 days) clinical follow-up, 1 year (± 28 days) clinical follow-up, 2 years (± 28 days) telephonic follow-up, 3 years (± 28 days) clinical follow-up, 4 years (± 28 days) telephonic follow-up and 5 years (± 28 days) clinical follow-up\]