Loading clinical trials...
Discover 16,770 clinical trials near Arizona. Find research studies in your area.
Browse by condition:
Showing 3781-3800 of 16,770 trials
NCT04857034
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of deucravacitinib (BMS-986165) compared with placebo in participants with active discoid and/or subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (DLE/SCLE). This study will also assess if deucravacitinib is biologically active and potentially effective in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe DLE/SCLE with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that is not well controlled with standard of care therapy.
NCT05701995
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of deucravacitinib on quality of life (QoL) in participants with plaque psoriasis in a community setting.
NCT03104374
This is a Phase 3 multicenter study that included two periods. Period 1 was designed to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) and 30 mg QD versus placebo in participants with moderately to severely active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) who had an inadequate response to Biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (bDMARDs). Period 2 evaluated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg QD and 30 mg QD in subjects with PsA who completed Period 1.
NCT06384261
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if participants treated with the experimental drug cusatuzumab added to venetoclax and azacitidine works to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared to venetoclax and azacitidine. Venetoclax and azacitidine are drugs commonly used to treat AML in patients that are unable to receive chemotherapy to treat AML. The main question the clinical trial aims to answer is does cusatuzumab added to venetoclax and azacitidine prolong the length of time participants live compared to venetoclax and azacitidine?
NCT06602024
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of mRNA-1010, and to evaluate relative vaccine efficacy (rVE) of mRNA-1010 versus an active comparator against reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed protocol-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) caused by any influenza A or B strains.
NCT01773928
The purpose of this study is to determine if a Vero cell-derived trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine produced by the modified manufacturing process: 1. induces immune responses comparable to that produced by the current manufacturing process 2. has an acceptable safety profile compared to a licensed trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine 3. demonstrates consistency of immune response among three different lots.
NCT05297448
Study RNLC3132 is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of rifaximin SSD-40mg IR for the delay of the first episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) decompensation in liver cirrhosis, defined by the presence of medically controlled ascites.
NCT05722015
This study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of SC pembrolizumab formulated with berahyaluronidase alfa (MK-3475A) versus (vs) intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab (MK-3475), administered with chemotherapy in first line treatment of adult participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The primary hypotheses of this study are pembrolizumab formulated with berahyaluronidase alfa subcutaneous (SC) is noninferior to pembrolizumab IV with respect to PK parameters.
NCT03729362
This is a phase 3 double-blind randomized study to study the efficacy and safety of intravenous ATB200 Co-administered with oral AT2221 in adult subjects with Late Onset Pompe Disease compared with Alglucosidase Alfa/placebo.
NCT06829667
This study is intended to be a retrospective chart review of patients with chronic ankle instability who have undergone a lateral ligament reconstructive procedure for ATFL repair (isolated or non-isolated) with suture tape augmentation. Patients that have been treated at any of the participating institutions that have undergone an ATFL reconstruction with Arthrex InternalBrace augmentation who have postoperative hospital or ASC records of safety and effectiveness as measured by adverse events, potential complications, and potential functional outcomes past the 10-week time point will be included.
NCT05721235
The is a multicenter, dose-optimized, open-label, safety/ tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) study with Azstarys® in children 4 and 5 years of age with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of treating children 4 and 5 years-of-age with ADHD with Azstarys® for up 12 months. Approximately 100 subjects will be enrolled. Approximately 20 sites will participate.
NCT05845814
This study is a substudy being conducted under one pembrolizumab umbrella master study KEYMAKER-U04. The substudy will consist of 2 parts. Part 1 will evaluate the efficacy and safety of coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab plus EV and coformulated vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EV relative to pembrolizumab plus EV. There will be no comparison of coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab plus EV versus coformulated vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EV. If ORR and/or DRR are substantially better on coformulated favezelimab/pembrolizumab plus EV and/or coformulated vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EV compared with pembrolizumab plus EV, after evaluation of the totality of data, the sponsor might consider Part 2 (expansion) to further characterize the efficacy and safety of the treatment arms under study.
NCT03944616
Diet beverages sweetened with artificial sweeteners occupy a unique category in the food environment as they are a source of intensely sweet taste with no calories. Diet beverages are the single largest contributor to artificial sweetener intake in the U.S. diet, and people with diabetes are the highest consumers of diet beverages, tending to consume them as a replacement for dietary sources of sugar, especially in place of sugar-sweetened beverages. This behavior has been endorsed by dietetic and scientific organizations, and diet beverages are marketed as being synonymous with better health, suitable for weight loss, and thus advantageous for diabetes control. The underlying public health concern is that there are few data to support or refute the benefit or harm of habitual diet beverage consumption by people with diabetes; therefore randomized trials with relevant outcomes must be conducted because they would address many limitations of previous research and have major implications for dietary recommendations on diet beverage intake and primary and secondary prevention of chronic disease. To begin addressing this important scientific gap the investigators are testing the effect of diet beverage intake on diabetes control parameters in free-living adults with type 2 diabetes in a randomized, two arm parallel trial with a run-in period of 2-weeks and an active intervention period of 24-weeks. This study will recruit 200 patients with type 2 diabetes who are usual consumers of commercial diet beverages and randomize them to receive and consume either: 1) A commercial diet beverage of choice (3 servings or 24 oz. daily); or 2) Unflavored bottled water of choice (sparkling or plain) (3 servings or 24 oz. daily). The primary outcome will be a central measure of clinical diabetes control in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The study will also measure the nature and magnitude of glycemic excursions via continuous glucose monitors, as well as clinical markers of cardiometabolic risk and kidney function. Lastly, investigators will measure plausible mechanisms whereby diet beverage intake may alter risk by assessing the effect of diet beverage intake on the functional composition of the gut microbiome via stool samples and comprehensive metabolomics, satiety hormones, as well as usual dietary intake, and upstream behavioral pathways which may inform dietary intake patterns.
NCT03588624
This study was conducted to evaluate the short-term (1 month) safety and effectiveness of a single TearCare procedure to treat adult patients with dry eye disease.
NCT04817007
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of BMS-986158 alone and in combination with either Ruxolitinib or Fedratinib in participants with Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-intermediate or high risk blood cancer. Part 1 consists of BMS-986158 in combination with either Ruxolitinib or Fedratinib and Part 2 consists of BMS-986158 in combination with either Ruxolitinib or Fedratinib and BMS-986158 alone.
NCT04992546
This was a Ph2a study that consists of a double-blind, intra-patient placebo-controlled treatment period and an open-label uncontrolled treatment period with objective to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK and preliminary efficacy of PRN473 in up to 40 patients with mild to moderate AD. On Day 1 (Baseline) of the Blinded Period, 2 target lesions with a difference no greater than 1 point in Total Sign Score (TSS) were randomly assigned to treatment in an intra-patient 1:1 manner, one lesion to PRN473 and the other to matching placebo. Participation took approximately 13 weeks, including up to a 5-week screening period, a 6-week treatment period, end of study assessments 1 day after last dose, and a safety follow-up phone call 2 weeks after last dose.
NCT02855268
Primary Objectives: * To assess the efficacy of lademirsen (SAR339375) in reducing the decline in renal function. * To assess the safety and tolerability of lademirsen (SAR339375) in participants with Alport syndrome. Secondary Objectives: * To assess plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the parent compound and its active major metabolite. * To assess the potential formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) following administration of lademirsen (SAR339375). * To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of lademirsen (SAR339375) on miR-21 and on changes in renal injury and function biomarkers.
NCT06848231
This is a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, Phase II, dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Ya-101 in subjects with multiple system atrophy.
NCT03459287
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion for support of acute anemia in cardiovascular surgery patients based on the clinical outcome of renal impairment following transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) treated with the INTERCEPT Blood System (IBS) for Red Blood Cells compared to patients transfused with conventional RBCs.
NCT06996301
Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) often lead to the overuse of empiric antibiotics, risking inappropriate treatment and contributing to antimicrobial resistance. This randomized, multi-center, investigator-blinded clinical trial is the first global head-to-head comparison of molecular diagnostic testing (Polymerase Chain Reaction : PCR) versus conventional culture and sensitivity (C\&S) for managing cUTIs in adults. Conducted across six U.S. clinical sites, the study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of PCR-guided treatment relative to C\&S-guided care. Eligible adult patients were randomized 1:1 into two diagnostic arms-PCR or C\&S-after providing informed consent. Urine samples were collected before randomization, tested by both methods, but clinicians remained blinded to the comparator results to avoid bias. Treatment decisions were based only on the assigned test results. Urine was collected at baseline (Day 1) and at end-of-study (Day 28). Samples were processed centrally: the PCR method (DocLab UTM 2.0) detected 28 uropathogens and 16 antibiotic resistance gene classes; C\&S testing quantified bacterial loads and assessed antimicrobial susceptibility using standard thresholds (≥10⁵ CFU/mL). The primary endpoint was the number of patients in each arm achieving a Favorable Clinical Outcome (FCl) at Day 28, defined as either: * Clinical Cure (complete symptom resolution requiring no further antibiotics), or * Clinical Improvement (partial symptom resolution without new symptoms or IV antibiotics). Secondary endpoints included: * Microbiological eradication at EOS (via C\&S and PCR). * Clinician satisfaction with diagnostic usefulness and result clarity. * Turnaround time comparison between PCR and C\&S. * Concordance analysis of test results between PCR and C\&S. * FCl rates in discordant cases, where PCR and C\&S results disagreed.
