Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy Comparing Peribulbar Anesthesia Versus Sub-tenon Injection Plus Topical Jelly Anesthesia
Vitreoretinal surgery has evolved to less invasive procedures, and it is used to treat a wide range of diseases. So anesthesia for vitreoretinal procedures has evolved, promoting adequate analgesia while reducing risks to the patient. In the present study two types of procedures for anesthesia during vitreoretinal surgery are evaluated regarding the pain referred by the patient during the whole procedure: peribulbar anesthesia versus sub-tenon injection plus topical jelly anesthesia. Through the comparative analysis of the pain scale of the two groups it is expected that the two modalities present the same anesthetic efficacy, showing that the methods used may be equivalent.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
School of Medicine - Clinical Hospital
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Start Date
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2019
Completion Date
October 31, 2019
Last Updated
November 4, 2019
56
ACTUAL participants
Topical lidocaine 2% jelly plus sub-tenon ropivacaine 10% injection
PROCEDURE
Peribulbar injection
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
NCT07351786
NCT07255859
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06380075