Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 1,124 trials
NCT07567911
This is a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study involving approximately 2,700 patients, designed to delineate the natural history of pneumonia by tracking the complete clinical course and dynamic multi-omics evolution from the acute phase to recovery; the study aims to quantify severe conversion rates and mortality by comparing baseline characteristics, pathogen distribution, and immune response trajectories between severe and non-severe groups, ultimately revealing the underlying molecular mechanisms of disease progression and optimizing clinical risk stratification strategies.
NCT04663958
The term postoperative pulmonary complication is the development of any complications affecting the respiratory system after anesthetic and surgery procedures. The ARISCAT risk assessment score is a seven-variable regression model that divides patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups. In this study, the investigators aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the ARISCAT risk scoring index in predicting postoperative pulmonary complication development in patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery.
NCT00001352
The protocol will be carried out in accordance with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the following United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) applicable to clinical studies: 45 CFR Part 46, 21 CFR Part 50, 21 CFR Part 56, 21 CFR Part 312, and/or 21 CFR Part 812. NIH-funded investigators and study site staff who are responsible for the conduct, management, or oversight of NIH-funded studies have completed Human Subjects Protection and ICH GCP Training. The protocol, informed consent form(s), recruitment materials, and all participant materials will be submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for review and approval. Approval of both the protocol and the consent form must be obtained before any participant is enrolled. Any amendment to the protocol will require review and approval by the IRB before the changes are implemented to the study. In addition, all changes to the consent form will be approved by the IRB; an IRB determination will be made regarding whether a new consent needs to be obtained from participants who provided consent, using a previously approved consent form.
NCT07545096
A major challenge in children's infections is that it is difficult to work out which bug is making them unwell. Tests can find the bugs that are present though there can be more than one. Some bugs may just be bystanders and not actually making the child sick. Children still receive antibiotics because it is not always clear that they don't need them. This project explores whether measuring how the body is reacting to the bugs gives precise information about which bug is actually making them sick. It will investigate children in intensive care who are suspected of having a chest infection. This study uses a novel technology called "metagenomics" to detect any bacteria or viruses in the lung. Alongside this, investigators will measure how the lungs respond to the bugs through further tests of cells and proteins collected from the lung fluid. This fluid will be tested to see if the response is due to bacteria or viruses. Collecting lung fluid samples requires that children are sedated and intubated, having a breathing tube in place. This means that only children intubated in intensive care are eligible. Extra samples of lung fluid and blood will be collected when being taken for routine clinical care. If these tests work, they have the potential to give rapid and accurate information about what type of infection is taking place in the lung. This means the correct antibiotics can be given to children who need them and avoid the harms of giving them to children who do not. This can reduce cost, improve patient outcomes and help limit the development of antibiotic resistance.
NCT07388680
Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is one of the most common thoracic-radiotherapy complications, with an incidence as high as 31.4 %. Multiple studies have shown that RILI can adversely affect patient prognosis by disrupting treatment schedules. Moreover, the widespread clinical use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has further increased pulmonary toxicity when radiotherapy (RT) is combined with ICIs. Checkpoint-inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP)-i.e., immune-mediated lung injury-may necessitate permanent discontinuation of ICIs, diminish survival benefit, and, in severe cases, directly threaten life. The diagnosis of both RILI and CIP is based on an integrated assessment of subjective symptoms and imaging findings.RILI typically occurs 1-3 months after completion of radiotherapy, whereas CIP may emerge at any point during treatment. The two entities share similar clinical presentations: fever, dry cough, chest tightness, dyspnoea, and pleuritic chest pain. Computed tomography (CT) is the most sensitive imaging modality. Pulmonary-function testing is another routinely used clinical metric; vital capacity, total lung capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) may all decline, with DLCO being the most sensitive parameter. In advanced cases, arterial oxygen and carbon-dioxide tensions may also deteriorate.Currently, RILI is managed empirically with systemic corticosteroids and supportive care; however, this approach yields limited improvement in diffusing capacity or ventilatory function, and its ability to prevent radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis (RPF) remains undefined. Corticosteroids also remain the mainstay of CIP therapy. Pirfenidone, a potent cytokine inhibitor, attenuates fibroblast activity by reducing production of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF), thereby suppressing fibroblast proliferation and extracellular-matrix collagen synthesis. Pre-clinical efficacy studies have demonstrated robust anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-fibrotic effects in the lung.Because RILI and pneumonitis arising from combined radio-immunotherapy are often indistinguishable in clinical practice, and because both share pathogenetic features with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the investigators initiated this phase II/III trial to address the unmet medical need for effective therapy. Building on prior pre-clinical and clinical data, the study aims to establish the optimal dose of pirfenidone capsules for RILI with or without concomitant CIP and to confirm efficacy and safety.Phase II (dose-finding): The study consists of a screening period (Day -28 to Day -1), a 168-day treatment-observation period (Day 1-Day 168), a safety follow-up (28 ± 7 days after the last dose), and subsequent disease-progression and survival follow-up. Ninety subjects with RILI, with or without CIP, who meet all eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned 1:1:1 to low-dose pirfenidone (400 mg TID), high-dose pirfenidone (600 mg TID), or matching placebo.Phase III (confirmatory): The dose of pirfenidone capsules for phase III will be determined jointly by the sponsor and investigators based on accumulated efficacy and safety data. The trial structure mirrors phase II: screening (Day -28 to Day -1), 168-day treatment-observation (Day 1-Day 168), safety follow-up (28 ± 7 days after the last dose), and disease-progression and survival follow-up. Eligible subjects with RILI ± CIP will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pirfenidone capsules (400 mg or 600 mg TID, taken with meals) or identical placebo. After completion of the 28-day post-treatment follow-up, all phase III participants will enter an extension phase for long-term survival assessment every 3 months (± 7 days).This trial will investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) associated with pirfenidone capsules in patients with Grade 2 and 3 radiation-induced lung injury (RILI), with or without chemotherapy-induced pneumonitis (CIP).
NCT06782282
The purpose of this study is to learn about how well the Prevnar 20 vaccine (PCV20) stops invasive pneumococcal disease (a group of severe infections caused by a bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae), pneumococcal pneumonia (a bacterial lung disease caused by the germ Streptococcus pneumoniae), all-cause pneumonia (pneumonia caused by any germ including bacteria, a virus, or a fungus), and lower respiratory tract infection (infection of the lower airways in the lung) in people 65 years and older. This study will use a database of people who have Medicare insurance with names and other identifying information removed. This study will include people who: * are 65 years and older, * live in one of the 50 United States or Washington DC, and * are enrolled in Medicare Fee-for-Service Parts A and B for at least 1 year. The study uses data that is already being collected and no treatment or vaccine will be given in the study. People that fit the description above will be followed in the Medicare database for about two years. Their information will be reviewed to see if they had vaccines for pneumonia or had certain health events, such as pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infection. The experiences of people that received Prevnar 20 will be compared to the experiences of people that did not receive the vaccine. This will help to show how well Prevnar 20 works at stopping invasive pneumococcal disease, pneumococcal pneumonia, all-cause pneumonia, and lower respiratory tract infection.
NCT07541690
1. Sample: urine, pus and sputum samples. 2. Culture: the samples will be inoculated on the MacConkey agar and subcultured on eosine methylene blue agar. 3. Identification of isolates will be done by: * Colony morphology. * Gram staining. * Biochemical reactions: including Indole, Methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, and Citrate utilization (IMViC) tests. 4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the isolates will be performed using the Kirby-Bauer method (disc diffusion method) using Muller Hinton agar according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2025) guidelines for selected groups of antibiotics. 5. Phenotypic detection of biofilm formation by the microtitre plate method. 6. Phenotypic detection of efflux pump activity by ethidium bromide-agar cartwheel method. 7. Detection of biofilm genes (fimH-1, mrkA, and mrkD) by conventional PCR. 8. Detection of efflux pump genes (acrAB, tolC, and mdtk) by conventional PCR.
NCT04466683
Low doses of radiation in the form of chest x-rays has been in the past to treat people with pneumonia. This treatment was thought to reduce inflammation and was found to be effective without side effects. However, it was an expensive treatment and was eventually replaced with less expensive treatment options like penicillin. The COVID-19 virus has emerged recently, causing high rates of pneumonia in people. The authors believe that giving a small dose of radiation to the lungs may reduce inflammation and neutralize the pneumonia caused by COVID-19. For this study, the x-ray given is called radiation therapy. Radiation therapy uses high-energy X-ray beams from a large machine to target the lungs and reduce inflammation. Usually, it is given at much higher doses to treat cancers. The purpose of this study is to find out if adding a single treatment of low-dose x-rays to the lungs might reduce the amount of inflammation in the lungs from COVID-19 infection, which could reduce the need for a ventilator or breathing tube.
NCT07428759
This study will evaluate the safety and immune response of a new formulation of pneumococcal vaccine, PnMAPS30plus, in healthy adults aged 50 to 64 years. Participants will receive a single dose of either the investigational vaccine or an approved pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) and will be monitored for approximately six months. The study aims to determine if PnMAPS30plus is safe and well-tolerated and whether it helps the body produce antibodies that protect against pneumococcal disease.
NCT05041140
This study is designed to measure the correlation of hyperpolarized 129-Xe magnetic resonance imaging (129-XeMRI) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) who develop bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) or BOS stage 0p (pulmonary impairment not meeting the definition for BOS, defined below) and controls with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). The primary objective of the study is to correlate 129-Xenon measures of ventilation, gas exchange, and pulmonary circulation with spirometric and quantitative CT measurements. A secondary objective is to determine whether measurement of 129-Xe MRI characteristics in patients with BOS stage 0p can predict BOS progression 6 months after enrollment.
NCT07199998
The availability, effectiveness, and safety of menstrual protection represent a key public health issue. However, research on women's menstrual and sexual health remains extremely limited. Whether societal or pathological, many hypotheses are emerging regarding the effects of menstrual protection products, yet little attention has been given to the products themselves, their societal role, or their physiological and pathological consequences. Internal menstrual products, such as tampons and menstrual cups, are widely used but are subject to limited regulatory oversight, and few studies have investigated their long-term effects on vaginal health. This study aims to investigate how different types of menstrual protection influence vaginal microbiota, immune responses, and the recurrence of gynecological conditions such as bacterial vaginosis, mycosis, or dysbiosis. Biological samples (vaginal, cervical, urinary, and blood) will be collected to analyze vaginal microbiota composition and local immunity. Participants will be divided into three groups based on their main type of menstrual protection: menstrual cup users, tampon users, and external pad users. The study will compare these groups to assess potential differences in vaginal health and immune response related to menstrual product use.
NCT07308938
The investigators seek to determine whether adjunctive topical fluorometholone (FML) improves best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months in patients with bacterial corneal ulcers compared with standard topical antibiotic therapy alone.
NCT01137487
Early enteral feeding is a key component of the management of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. However, enteral feeding has been associated with serious complications such as aspiration followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Many critically ill patients experience poor tolerance of early enteral nutrition because of impaired gastric motility, which leads to a sequence of delayed gastric emptying, increased gastric volume, gastroesophageal reflux, vomiting, aspiration, and VAP. Routine monitoring of residual gastric volume (RGV) to minimize the risk of aspiration is standard practice. RGV is assumed to reflect gastric content, with high RGVs indicating impaired gastric emptying that requires discontinuation of enteral feeding in order to prevent aspiration.However, RGV measurement is neither standardized nor validated. The cut-off value that may indicate an increased risk of aspiration and therefore a need for discontinuing enteral feeding has not been determined, and cut-offs used in studies have ranged from 150 to 500 ml. No data are available to support a correlation between RGV and the rates of adverse events. In experimental studies, RGV failed to correlate with vomiting, aspiration, or VAP. The investigators hypothesize that RGV monitoring fails to decrease the risk of VAP and leed to inappropriate interruptions in enteral feeding with a risk of underfeeding. To assess the effects of not measuring RGV on VAP and enteral feeding delivery, the investigators designed a prospective randomized controlled study.
NCT07134751
Approximately one million febrile infants aged ≤60 days present annually to pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) in Europe and the United States. Although fewer than 5% are diagnosed with meningitis or bacteremia (invasive bacterial infections - IBIs), and 10-15% with urinary tract infections (UTIs), current guidelines recommend extensive diagnostic evaluations, hospitalization, and empirical treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics. This approach may contribute to medical overuse, with implications for patient care, healthcare resource utilization, and environmental sustainability. The Febrile Infants Swedish Study (FISS) is a prospective observational study conducted across 11 PEDs in Sweden. All febrile infants aged ≤60 days presenting to participating sites will be eligible. A new clinical guideline for the management of infants with fever without source (FWS) will be implemented in 7 PEDs, while 4 PEDs will continue with current standard practice and serve as a comparison group. The study is expected to run for approximately two years and aims to recruit a minimum of 2,500 febrile infants
NCT04530799
A prospective multi-center observational study to assess the incidence of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) in ICU patients and to identify host- and pathogen related risk factors for IAPA in EORTC negative ICU patients with severe influenza.
NCT07463963
The main objective of the study is to demonstrate that not performing a systematic UC before the TURB procedure is non-inferior to performing a systematic UC in terms of the incidence of febrile UTIs during the first 30 postoperative days
NCT07496502
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral intestinal microbiota capsules for decolonizing multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and Clostridioides difficile in patients requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was clearance of pre-existing MDROs or C. difficile from stool 14 days post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, hospitalization rates, and need for additional antibiotics during 30-day follow-up.
NCT06743529
Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the leading nosocomial infection in the intensive care units, and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and overuse of antibiotics. Initiating antibiotic therapy immediately after bacteriological sampling (immediate strategy) may expose uninfected patients to unnecessary treatment, while waiting for bacteriological confirmation (conservative strategy) may delay ventilator-associated pneumonia in infected patients. The decision to start antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia takes three points into account: diagnostic probability, the risks to the patient if Antibiotic Therapy is delayed, and the risk of selection of resistant bacteria. Diagnostic probability is limited, given the subjective and non-specific nature of the diagnostic criteria, and only 30-50% of suspected cases are confirmed bacteriologically (whereas samples are only taken when the pre-test probability is sufficient). The risks associated with delayed antibiotic therapy are unknown, as few observational studies have directly assessed the impact of the timing of Antibiotic Therapy initiation on outcome (frequent confusion between delayed and inappropriate Antibiotic Therapy). Iregui et al. found that delaying Antibiotic Therapy by more than 24 hours was associated with higher mortality. However, more recent before-and-after studies have shown that the conservative strategy was associated with lower mortality, more frequently appropriate initial Antibiotic Therapy and shorter duration of Antibiotic Therapy. Similarly, in a recent before-and-after study by our team, initiating antibiotic therapy only upon microbiological confirmation of ventilator-associated pneumonia without septic shock or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome was not associated with an increase in ventilation time, length of stay or excess mortality at D28; but was associated with antibiotic therapy that was more often appropriate (DELAVAP, MARTIN et al, Annals of Intensive Care, 2024). Finally, the recent multicenter TARPP pilot study in surgical intensive care suggests that antibiotic therapy initiated on the basis of microbiological data in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia not requiring vasopressor support is not associated with a poorer outcome than immediate antibiotic therapy without documentation (the only randomized study on this subject). Antibiotic Therapy for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia that is not subsequently confirmed is an unnecessary use of antibiotics and carries a risk of selection of resistant bacteria, with adverse effects on public health. It has been reported that a conservative Antibiotic Therapy prescription strategy for intensive care units -acquired infections reduces Antibiotic Therapy use and the incidence of acquired β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. Overall, in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia but no signs of clinical severity, given the uncertainty about attributable mortality and concerns about bacterial resistance, the evaluation of the conservative Antibiotic Therapy strategy is reasonable. Some French intensive care units already delay Antibiotic Therapy until confirmation of ventilator-associated pneumonia, except in patients with severe hypoxemia or the need for vasopressor support.
NCT07251465
The purpose of this study is to learn how effective is PCV20 to help stop adults from getting pneumonia. Pneumonia is an infection of the lungs that can be caused by germs like bacteria, virus, or fungi. This study uses existing healthcare information. No participants will be actively enrolled. The information of participants will be taken from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's (KPSC) electronic health records (EHR). We will look at the EHR information for adults who meet the following points: * 18 years of age or older and a KPSC member as of 01 July 2022. * have been a KPSC member for at least one year before 01 July 2022. * have not received PCV15. * have had pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infection within 30 days of 01 July 2022. The study will begin from 01 July 2022 and will be followed through 30 June 2025. At the end of the follow-up period, the study will compare the number of pneumonia cases among people who receive PCV20 who do not receive it.
NCT05993442
NeoDeco is a pragmatic, multicenter, parallel-group, cluster-randomised hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial designed to evaluate the impact of implementing optimised Kangaroo Care (KC) at the unit level compared to standard care in high-technology neonatal units. The trial includes a baseline period, a wash-in phase, and a staggered randomisation approach. The primary focus of the NeoDeco study is on high-risk preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestational age, a population particularly vulnerable to hospital-acquired infections and sepsis during their initial hospital stay. By investigating hospital-acquired infections specifically, the study targets the period during which optimised KC practices are likely to have the most significant impact.