Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 70 trials
NCT07287423
Prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, unblinded, chronic feasibility study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the AVEIR™ Conduction System Pacing (CSP) Leadless Pacemaker system.
NCT07464834
We tested the effect of mailing informational postcards to patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices who have lost continuous RM connectivity because of a disconnected home monitor.
NCT07342036
The goal of this clinical trial is to record the incidence of newly developed or worsening tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) following the implantation of a pacemaker or defibrillator with a transvenous lead. To collect this data, a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) with 3D imaging of the tricuspid valve (TV) will be performed before and after pacemaker implantation, with particular emphasis on assessing the tricuspid valve. Additionally, routine follow-up visits will be conducted at 6 and 12 months post-intervention, during which a TTE, ECG, NT-proBNP measurement, and pacemaker check will be performed.
NCT07305194
This prospective observational study evaluates the burden of Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHRE) in patients without a prior history of atrial fibrillation who undergo concurrent Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing (BBAP) and Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP). Physiological pacing at these sites aims to improve interatrial conduction and reduce the risk of atrial arrhythmias. The study includes a comparative assessment across three patient groups: 1. BBAP + LBBP (physiological pacing group) 2. Right Atrial Appendage (RAA) pacing + LBBP 3. Conventional pacing - RAA and Right Ventricular (RV) pacing AHRE burden will be quantified via device diagnostics and remote monitoring at 3, 12 and 24 months post-implantation. Episodes will be classified by duration (0-6 min, 6-24 h, \>24 h), differentiating subclinical AHRE from clinically documented AF. Secondary analyses include electrocardiographic changes (P-wave indices), the need for antiarrhythmic therapy, and comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation of atrial function (e.g., LA strain, conduction delays, LAVI). The study aims to determine whether physiological pacing (BBAP + LBBP) provides superior protection against AHRE development compared with RAA + LBBP and conventional pacing strategies.
NCT05884359
This study will utilize 3D mapping as a tool to explore electro-anatomical and electrocardiographic characteristics of the Left Bundle Branch Area. We plan on prospectively reviewing the data found from 3D mapping the left bundle branch implantation cases and using the data to improve understanding of electro-anatomical characteristics of this area for a better definition of the implantation target and depth.
NCT07236489
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly expanded over the past decade as a treatment for severe aortic valve stenosis, with over 14,000 procedures performed in France in 2021. A common complication following TAVI is traumatic atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation, occurring in about 10% of patients. Conventional right ventricular pacing in these cases often leads to interventricular dyssynchrony, which can impair left ventricular ejection fraction and increase the risk of hospitalization, heart failure, and mortality. Cardiac resynchronization therapy via biventricular pacing is sometimes proposed as a secondary intervention but involves additional surgery. A newer pacing technique-selective left bundle branch area pacing-has been developed to provide physiological ventricular activation by stimulating conduction pathways distal to the lesion, thereby avoiding dyssynchrony. Retrospective studies suggest clinical benefits, but no prospective randomized trial has yet evaluated its efficacy compared to standard pacing. The objective of this study is to conduct the first randomized clinical trial comparing left bundle branch area pacing versus conventional right ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemaker implantation due to atrioventricular block after TAVI.
NCT07247422
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, with a lifetime risk of 1 in 3-5. In cases of rapid ventricular rate, patients often experience low blood pressure, making standard rate and rhythm control medications contraindicated. While cardioversion may be necessary, it is often ineffective in long-standing AF and can lead to left ventricular stunning. This creates a vicious cycle, worsening heart failure and cardiogenic shock. AV node ablation may be required, but it is irreversible and carries risks, including complications from long-term pacing. Therefore, temporary pacing may be a preferable option to allow for hemodynamic improvement and better ventricular filling. Research suggests that parasympathetic fibers innervating the AV node can modulate conduction. Ablation in these fibers has shown promise for treating vagal-mediated syncope, and high-frequency pacing may provide chronic heart rate suppression. Intermittent pacing has also been effective in reducing ventricular rates in atrial fibrillation to prevent inappropriate ICD shock. This may be potentially beneficial for patients with uncontrolled fast AF. In a proof-of-concept study with five patients, pacing at 30Hz and 10mA in the coronary sinus resulted in a dose-dependent prolongation of the ventricular cycle length during AF, with stable blood pressure and no discomfort reported. This suggests that pacing these fibers could achieve rate control without the need for medications or AV node ablation, with no complications observed. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of temporary cardio-neural pacing (CNP). This is a prospective cohort study involving patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and rapid ventricular conduction who have failed or are contraindicated for rate control with antiarrhythmic medications. Enrolled patients will be followed up for 1 month.
NCT07246135
The registry for leadless pacemakers will collect and annually analyze the data of all leadless pacemaker implantations at the University Hospital St. Pölten, including demographic information, indications, procedural details, acute, medium- and long-term complications during follow-up. Due to the partially novel nature of the signals (atrial mechanical sensing markers) and the lack of long-term experience to date, data on these aspects will also be collected and analyzed. This is a single-center, prospective and retrospective registry that includes all patients receiving a leadless pacing device, as well as all patients who received a leadless pacing device between January 2021 and the start of the registry. All patients undergoing implantation of a leadless pacemaker will be invited to participate in the registry. For patients to be included retrospectively, participation in the registry will be offered at the time of their next routine follow-up visit. The indication for leadless pacing will be determined by the physician responsible for the patient. Enrollment in the registry will in no case alter or influence the treatment the patient receives. Data collection will take place at the time of implantation and continuously during follow-up over the entire study period. Pacemaker-related data may be obtained either in person or via remote monitoring.
NCT06620237
The goal of this clinical study is to test the clinical safety and performance of the Amvia pacemakers and the Solia CSP S lead when used for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). The patient population consist of patients with cardiac pacemaker indication or cardiac resynchronization therapy indication and intended for implantation of a system with left bundle branch area stimulation. Participants will visit sites at enrollment in the study, at implantation and pre-hospital discharge, 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Additional annual follow-up(s) may apply until study termination after regulatory approval of Solia CSP S. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be until September 2027, with last patient out (LPO). During the visits the regular pacemaker and lead measurement are performed. A 12-lead ECG is recorded to document intrinsic and ventricularly paced heart rhythm to assess left bundle branch area pacing. Programming of the pacemakers will be done according to the participant´s therapeutical needs. The study will be conducted in approximately 18 sites in Europe, Australia and New Zealand where more than one physician per site are expected to participate.
NCT03475498
Chronic right ventricular pacing has a deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) function, namely pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Several parametes make difference of effect on the occurrence of PICM and its subsequent clinical outcomes. In particular, recognition of a major determinant focused on the ECG or echocardiographic parameters including strain or genetic factor for occurrence of PICM may lead to better identification of patients at high risk. Investigators prospectively enroll a participant with documented high risk of PICM and clinically follow-up to idenify clinical impact of PICM (PICM syndrome) over a long period of time.
NCT07106788
The primary purpose of the PMS is to collect safety information on the Aveir DR leadless cardiac pacemaker (LP) system in a population indicated for de novo dual-chamber pacing. Additionally, the PMS will collect data on rollover patients from the Aveir DR i2i IDE, Aveir AR LP in patients indicated for single-chamber pacing in the right atrium, and upgradeability in patients implanted with single-chamber Aveir atrial or ventricular LP that require an upgrade to a dual-chamber Aveir LP.
NCT05868616
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) exists in about 25% of patients with congestive heart failure and is associated with worsened prognosis. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been one of the most important advancements in the past two decades for patients with LBBB heart failure. However, 30-40% of patients receiving a CRT do not benefit from it. In this study, the investigators will test a noninvasive device to evaluate acute effect of CRT during implantation and at follow-up CRT controls. In addition, echocardiography will be performed during CRT turned ON and OFF to visualize the changes in intraventricular flow and functional parameters of the heart.
NCT04870424
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. While peri-procedural complications such as stroke, vascular complications and bleeding have substantially declined with the refinement of transcatheter valves and increasing experience, new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) or atrioventricular conduction disturbances continue to occur in almost half of all patients. Colchicine is a well-known substance that has been approved for the treatment of acute gout flares and familial Mediterranean fever in many countries. Colchicine has proven safe and effective in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine may mitigate the occurrence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances and thus the need for the implantation of a permanent pacemaker post transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of the Co-STAR-Trial is to investigate the efficacy of colchicine for the prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation and conduction disturbances requiring the implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Co-STAR is an investigator-initiated, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 200 patients referred for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and selected to undergo TAVI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment with Colchicine or placebo for 30 days post transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
NCT06272344
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators need to be regularly and systematically interrogated and reprogrammed to ensure proper functioning. While remote monitoring allows for partial interrogation at a remote location, full CIED check-up and reprogramming is only possible when the patient visits a cardiologist capable of performing device programming. This can be challenging for patients and may cause unnecessary delays, particularly in settings of limited resources, enforced physical distancing, and quarantines. The aim of this study is to evaluate our previously validated remote programming solution (REACT study, NCT05366660) in outpatient device clinics which are close to the patient's home but remote from the CIED expert.
NCT06922526
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, with severe TR being associated with increased rates of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality, significantly impairing patients' quality of life. With technological advancements, physiological pacing modalities have demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and safety profiles compared to conventional pacing methods. This study aims to evaluate predictors of adverse outcomes and TR progression in CIED recipients under different pacing modalities, thereby providing clinical guidance for high-risk patients.
NCT06842940
The goal of this observational study is to identify the most reliable electrical parameter measured at the time of implantation that can predict optimal lead fixation and long-term lead performance in patients undergoing transvenous pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is there a correlation between the slew rate measured at the time of lead implantation and the sensing measured at the 12-month follow-up? * Is there a correlation between all electrical parameters recorded at implantation (including slew rate, current of injury, acute sensing, acute impedance, and acute pacing threshold) and the electrical parameters assessed at 12 months post-implantation (specifically chronic sensing, chronic impedance, and chronic pacing threshold)? Participants will undergo regular follow-up evaluations, with device interrogation visits scheduled at 1 and 12 months post-implantation as part of routine clinical care.
NCT05498376
Cardiac pacemaker (PM) implantation is the established treatment for relevant bradyarrhythmias. Conventional PMs require 1-3 pacing leads to register the heart's intrinsic activity ("sensing") and to deliver the electrical stimuli to the heart ("pacing"). These leads are responsible for the vast majority of morbidity after implantation and PM failures. Therefore, a leadless PM system (Micra TPS™, Medtronic, United States) has been introduced a few years ago. This system overcomes the limitations of leads, however, the first generation of the Micra TPS™ only allowed sensing and pacing in the right ventricle. More recently, an upgraded version has been introduced and gained market approval (Micra AV, Medtronic, United States). According to published results from several clinical trials, this device allows sensing the atrial activity and, thus, timing the delivery of the ventricular pacing impulse in a physiological manner similar to a conventional dual-chamber PM with two leads. Clinical feasibility and safety for this concept have been established already. However, it is unclear if this translates into a direct clinical benefit for patients in comparison to conventional PM systems. The aim of this trial is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the Micra AV™ PM and conventional dual-chamber PM systems in patients with intermittent or permanent atrioventricular conduction block and a PM indication according to the latest European guidelines. Thus, patients will be randomized to either a conventional dual-chamber PM implantation or the implantation of a leadless Micra AV™ system. Patients will be stratified for gender (female/male) and a priori estimated physical exercise capacity ("fit"/"unfit"). The primary outcome will be the physical exercise capacity of the patients. The null hypothesis with regards to the primary endpoint is that the leadless pacemaker arm shows an inferior VO2 anaerobic threshold than the conventional pacemaker arm. Hence the alternative hypothesis postulates that the leadless pacemaker arm shows a non-inferior VO2 anaerobic threshold compared to the conventional pacemaker arm. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
NCT05541679
The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.
NCT03357926
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a five-fold increased risk of cerebrovascular stroke. While the risk of stroke in patients with known AF can be calculated via AF stroke prediction risk scores, the prediction of AF occurrence per se in individual patients remains difficult. We will recruit 250 patients with an implanted dual-chamber Pacemaker (PM) or an implantable cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) with atrial lead to ensure continuous rhythm monitoring during follow up. At baseline, we will gather clinical and device data of patients. For AF prediction based on surface Electrocardiography (ECG), 24-h Holter ECG monitoring will be performed. After 6 months, we will assess the occurrence of AF during the study period via interrogation of PM/ICD. The resulting data will be used to develop algorithms including clinical, device and ECG data for prediction of the development of AF in individual patients. If possible, we will develop a risk score of high accuracy by combination of demographical, clinical and technical parameters of device patients. The resulting risk score could potentially help to facilitate the decision if anticoagulation is necessary in patients with either risk of AF or embolic stroke of unknown origin. Furthermore, Hayn et al. (AIT Austrian Institute of Technology) are currently developing algorithms to predict the occurrence of AF surface ECG data. It is an additional aim of this project to support the development of this algorithm in pacemaker and ICD patients and to increase the accuracy of AF prediction with clinical parameters and other parameters available to patients with implanted pacemaker (PM) or implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
NCT06692218
Leadless pacemakers (LP) are safe and effective alternatives to transvenous pacemakers in select patients. Advances in battery and electronics technology allow for the entire pacemaker system to be implanted into the right ventricle, bypassing many of the weaknesses of transvenous pacemakers. Traditionally leadless pacemakers have been implanted in the right ventricular (RV) septum to prevent cardiac perforation, and much emphasis is placed during implantation to ensure a septal implant. However, in Asians with smaller heart sizes, septal implantation may be unfeasible. Cases of RV free wall implant have been achieved without any complications. This study aims to examine patients previously implanted with LP and determine their final attachment location. If a substantial portion of complication-free patients had RV free wall implants, then it can be argued the additional effort to ensure a septal implant is unnecessary. Additionally, intraoperative data, such as the intracardiac electrogram, may contain parameters correlated with implant position. This study also aims to study this correlation to guide future implant procedures. This is a prospective-retrospective cohort study. Patients who will implant leadless pacemakers or already implanted leadless pacemakers since 1 Jan 2015 will be recruited. After the implantation, patients will be invited back for a noncontrast ECG-gated CT heart. It will be timed at the end diastole and a 3D reconstruction will be performed. The attachment of the leadless pacemaker to the RV will be adjudicated from the CT. The patients' pre-operative laboratory tests, baseline demographics, medical history, LP electrical data and pre- and post-operative medication regiment will be collected retrospectively from their medical records in the Hospital Authority's Clinical Management System (CMS) and Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS).