Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 70 trials
NCT07654452
This randomized comparative clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of flap versus flapless techniques for delayed dental implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Sixteen patients requiring implant placement in the maxillary anterior or premolar region will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group I will undergo implant placement using the conventional flap technique, while Group II will receive implant placement using the flapless technique. Clinical outcomes including postoperative pain, edema, surgical insertion time, and implant stability will be assessed. Radiographic evaluation will include peri-implant bone quantity, bone quality, and crestal bone loss. Follow-up examinations will be performed immediately after surgery and at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
NCT07626827
This prospective randomized crossover clinical trial evaluates and compares the clinical performance and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of complete dentures fabricated through two additive manufacturing workflows - digital and hybrid - in edentulous patients attending the Dental Clinic of Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo (UEES), Samborondón, Ecuador. In the digital workflow, complete dentures are fabricated using direct intraoral scanning of edentulous ridges, CAD design, and 3D printing. In the hybrid workflow, conventional functional impressions are digitized, followed by CAD design and additive manufacturing of the definitive dentures. Each eligible participant receives two complete denture sets in a randomized crossover sequence (no washout period): Denture Set 1 is worn for 2 months, after which the participant crosses over to Denture Set 2, worn for an additional 2 months. Total active follow-up per participant is approximately 4 months. Following completion of the crossover phase, denture wear is monitored longitudinally for 12 months from the insertion of the second denture set (total study duration approximately 16 months per participant). The study addresses three specific objectives: To determine the clinical success rate of complete dentures fabricated by additive manufacturing under digital and hybrid workflows, evaluating retention, stability, denture base adaptation, occlusal balance, and need for clinical adjustments. To evaluate the impact of complete denture treatment on OHRQoL using the validated OHIP-EDENT questionnaire, assessed at the insertion of each denture set and at the 2-month control of each period (4 measurement points total). To evaluate the relationship between maximum masticatory force (T-Scan digital occlusal analysis system) and denture wear (volumetric 3D digital metrology via STL superimposition), with wear monitored over 12 months from insertion of the second denture set.
NCT06538870
The goal of this pilot study is to learn about healing after dental implant placement in patients taking a class of biologic drug called Tumor Necrosis Factor or TNF-alpha antagonist or inhibitor. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do patients taking TNF-alpha inhibitors have any complications after the placement of dental implants? Do patients taking TNF-alpha inhibitor experience increased pain after dental implant placement compared to the expected levels when healing from this procedure? Researchers will recruit patients both taking these drugs and those not taking these drugs to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Participants missing teeth will be recruited to receive dental implants to meet ideal dental status and will be followed before and after the implant placement to determine levels of health and ensure proper healing. Participants will be followed for a total of one year and follow up visits will consist of both clinical examination and radiographs (x-rays) to evaluate bone level and implant status. Participants will also be asked to rate their pain during clinic visits and at home on a diary and record the amount of pain control medication they take after the implant procedure.
NCT07211022
This clinical trial evaluates the accuracy of two digital impression techniques intraoral photogrammetry and intraoral scanning in patients rehabilitated with full-arch implant-supported prostheses (All-on-4 and All-on-6 concepts).
NCT07474454
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different biological drilling speeds (50, 150, and 300 rpm) during implant osteotomy preparation in the mandible on marginal bone level changes and implant stability. Thirty-nine patients requiring a single dental implant in the mandible will be randomly allocated into three groups according to drilling speed. All implants will be placed using a biological drilling protocol without irrigation. Implant stability will be measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant placement and follow-up visits. Marginal bone levels will be evaluated radiographically using standardized periapical radiographs during the follow-up period up to 12 months. The study aims to determine whether different low-speed drilling protocols influence peri-implant bone remodeling and implant stability.
NCT07449546
This observational study aims to evaluate the association between periodontal status and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) levels in patients diagnosed with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Both serum and saliva TMAO concentrations will be measured and compared according to periodontal health, periodontitis, and edentulism status. Clinical periodontal examinations and biological sample collection will be performed. The study seeks to investigate whether oral health status is associated with systemic TMAO levels in individuals with PAD.
NCT07448701
This prospective clinical study compares two cementation techniques for implant-supported zirconia fixed partial dentures on titanium bases (Ti-bases): extraoral cementation performed on the working model and intraoral cementation performed chairside. Thirty clinical cases with two osseointegrated implants requiring a multi-unit zirconia restoration will be recruited at the UIC Dental Clinic. For each case, two restorations with identical design will be produced: one will be cemented extraorally (control) and an identical replica will be cemented intraorally (test). Micro-deformation will be assessed as peri-implant microstrain (µε) using a standardized strain-gauge setup and the same recording protocol for both techniques. The primary analysis compares microstrain between intraoral and extraoral cementation within each case; implant/prosthetic events will be recorded descriptively.
NCT07408778
This randomized controlled trial compares a mandibular overdenture retained by one implant placed in the parasymphyseal or canine region with a mandibular overdenture retained by two implants placed in the interforaminal region in completely edentulous adults. Primary outcomes are oral health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and masticatory performance measured by a two-color chewing gum mixing test, assessed at baseline before implant surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after overdenture insertion.
NCT05409287
The planned study is designed to provide evidence for the application of early implant placement with partial bone-healing and either an immediate or an early restoration/ loading protocol. Materials and methods The study will be conducted according to the recommendations published as the CONSORT statement and respecting the intention to treat principle. Participants will be enrolled if they present with a mandibular first molar that has to be extracted, and require implant treatment for replacement of the molar. Ridge preservation using a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be done following the extraction. After 12 weeks of healing, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a digital intraoral scan will be taken, followed by digital planning of the implant position and the additive construction of a surgical drill guide by means of rapid prototyping using a 3-D printer. Afterwards, the participants will be randomized into the two study groups: Group A (immediate loading): A screw-retained PMMA implant provisional bonded to a titanium base will be fabricated subtractively by computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), based on the data of the digitally planned implant position. Group B (early loading): No further preparation has to be done. Before finishing 16 weeks post-extraction, implants (Straumann Standard Implant RN, TiZr, minimum length: 10mm, minimum diameter 4.1mm) will be placed in both study groups using sCAIS. During surgery, the surgeon will not know if the participant was allocated to Group A or Group B. Directly after surgery, digital intraoral scans will be obtained, to record the final implant position. Afterwards, either the prepared implant provisional (Group A; immediate loading) or a healing cap (Group B, early loading) will be inserted into the implant. 4 weeks after implant placement the participants in Group B will receive a loaded, screw-retained implant provisional, based on the data of the post-surgery scan. 6-months after implant placement participants will receive final screw-retained single implant crowns. The study end will be a final follow-up visit after 12 months. Participants will be invited for further follow-up visits up to 5 years. (not part of the present proposal) Implant survival/ success will be evaluated according to the criteria described by Buser et al. All secondary outcomes will be assessed by validated indices and instruments.
NCT07377890
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of two denture impression techniques, digital intraoral scanning and conventional border-molded impressions, in adults who have lost all their teeth (fully edentulous patients). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is a digital intraoral scan as accurate as a conventional impression for capturing the shape of the mouth, including movable gum areas? Are repeated digital scans consistent (precise) when taken multiple times on the same patient? Researchers will compare digital impressions taken with an intraoral scanner to conventional impressions made with custom trays and border molding to see if digital scans can match the accuracy of the traditional "gold standard" method. Participants will: Attend Dubai Dental Hospital for two study visits. Have their mouth scanned three times using a digital intraoral scanner. Have a conventional impression taken using a custom tray and high-accuracy material after border molding. Provide informed consent and allow their impression data to be analyzed for accuracy.
NCT07208812
This randomized crossover clinical trial aims to compare three different impression techniques for the construction of 3d-printed mandibular implant overdentures in completely edentulous patients. Sixteen patients will receive two mandibular implants and three overdentures fabricated using:(1) conventional open-tray implant level impression (2) functionally generated reline impression, and (3)mucostatic base with functional borders impression. Each overdenture will be worn for three months with a washout period between interventions. The primary outcome is masticatory efficiency, assessed using a color -mixing ability test at 3,6, and9 months. Secondary outcome is patient satisfaction, assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the same intervals. the study hypothesis is that the impression technique influences both chewing efficiency and patient satisfaction
NCT06943846
The purpose of this study is to better understand oral wound healing in the aged participant following placement of platelet-rich fibrinogen (PRF). In this study, 12 participants requiring a posterior tooth extraction will be enroll: 6 participants aged 14-18, 6 participants aged 50-80. All will undergo a posterior tooth extraction with a small tissue specimen taken from the extraction site. Half of the participants will also have their blood drawn and platelet-rich fibrinogen placed in the extraction socket. Participants will return in 2 weeks for suture removal and another soft tissue sample. Participants will return at 3 months for a final post-operative radiograph. All soft tissue samples will undergo immunofluorescence.
NCT07323628
This study is being conducted to compare two types of bar attachments used to support lower dentures in patients who have lost all their lower teeth. Many people who wear a single lower denture experience problems with stability, chewing, and comfort. Placing two implants in the lower jaw and attaching the denture to a bar can greatly improve how well the denture stays in place. Traditionally, these bars have been made from metal. While effective, metal bars can place higher stress on the bone around the implants, which may lead to more bone loss over time. A newer material, PEEK (polyetheretherketone), is lighter and has flexibility closer to natural bone. This may reduce stress on the implants and help protect the surrounding bone. In this randomized clinical trial, patients are assigned to receive either a PEEK bar or a metal bar to retain their lower denture. All participants receive two implants placed in the canine region of the lower jaw, followed by a bar-retained overdenture after healing. The study follows patients for 12 months and measures: Marginal bone loss: how much bone is lost around each implant, assessed through radiographs. Patient satisfaction: how comfortable and functional the denture feels, including stability, chewing, speech, hygiene, and overall handling. Early results show that both types of bars support the denture well, but implants connected to PEEK bars tend to show less bone loss after several months compared to those connected to metal bars. Patient satisfaction is high in both groups, with slightly higher scores reported by patients using PEEK bars, although not significantly different. This study may help dentists choose the best bar material to improve long-term implant health and denture comfort.
NCT07315607
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of a fully digital workflow for the immediate placement of a previously fabricated screw-retained provisional crown using digital planning and guided implant surgery. The study will be conducted in partially edentulous adult patients requiring the replacement of a single tooth with an immediately loaded dental implant. The main objective of the study is to assess the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the planned digital implant position and provisional restoration by comparing the virtually planned position with the actual clinical outcome after guided surgery. Emphasis will be placed on linear, angular, and rotational deviations at both the implant and provisional restoration levels. Participants will undergo a fully guided implant placement procedure with rotational control, followed by the immediate placement of a prefabricated screw-retained provisional crown designed during the digital planning phase. Postoperative intraoral scans will be obtained to register the final implant and restoration positions. The planned and achieved positions will be compared using three-dimensional analysis software to quantify deviations and determine whether the accuracy achieved remains within clinically acceptable limits.
NCT06764784
This study evaluates three different methods of dental implant surgery-freehand, pilot-drilled, and fully guided techniques-in patients with partial tooth loss (partial edentulism). Dental implants are widely used to restore missing teeth, but the success of these procedures depends heavily on accurate placement and surgical precision. The study involves 90 participants, divided into three groups of 30, each undergoing one of the three surgical techniques. The main goals are to compare surgery duration, implant placement accuracy, post-operative recovery, patient satisfaction, and long-term success rates. Key findings suggest that fully guided implant surgery offers the highest accuracy, the shortest recovery time, and the highest patient satisfaction. Pilot-drilled surgery also showed excellent results, providing a balance between precision and efficiency. Freehand surgery, while flexible, showed slightly lower accuracy and higher complication rates. This research aims to guide patients and healthcare providers in selecting the most suitable implant surgery method for improved outcomes and long-term success in dental care.
NCT07290322
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate denture retention in intra-orally scanned versus extra-orally scanned digitally printed maxillary dentures in completely edentulous patients. The main question is : 1. Do intra-orally scanned dentures provide better retention compared to extra-orally scanned dentures? Researchers will compare the intra-orally scanned denture group to the extraorally scanned denture group to determine if one method leads to superior retention records. Participants will: • Receive both types of dentures (intra-orally scanned and extra-orally scanned), with a three-week wash-out period between each intervention. The study aims to provide evidence on the optimal scanning method for digitally printed maxillary dentures in edentulous patients.
NCT07107464
The goal of this clinical trial is to understand how different implant neck designs and placement depths affect the surrounding bone and peri-implant tissue (the tissue around a dental implant) in adults who need implants in the back areas of the mouth (molars and premolars). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does placing implants deeper under the bone crest (subcrestally) help preserve more bone and peri-implant tissue over time? Do implants with longer, conical necks and micro-threaded surfaces result in more stable peri-implant tissue than implants with shorter necks? Researchers will compare three types of one-piece dental implants with different neck heights (short, standard, and long), placed at different depths in the jawbone, to determine which combination better maintains bone and peri-implant tissue levels. Participants will: Receive two dental implants in the posterior upper or lower jaw Be randomly assigned to one of three groups depending on implant neck design and placement depth Undergo implant surgery using a digital workflow, with healing over three months Be rehabilitated with custom zirconia bridges Return for regular clinical and imaging checkups over a period of at least 3 years This study aims to generate evidence that helps clinicians choose implant designs and techniques that promote long-term peri-implant tissue health.
NCT04895969
The patterns of tooth loss are evaluated in many selected populations in numerous countries and so the frequency of partial edentulism seems to vary widely between different countries. The prevalence of various patterns of partially edentulous arches should be frequently revised and updated . This could help identify the changing treatment needs of the population and provide guidelines to prevent tooth loss emphasis should be placed on dental education, improve the quality of prosthodontic care being provided to patients oral and general health promotion which should highlight the control of common oral diseases such as caries at their various stages of progression and periodontal diseases. Additionally, regular dental check-ups should be made mandatory at schools, colleges and workplaces and community field trips should be conducted in order that increase in oral health awareness can also discourage patients attitude waiting until acute symptoms develop. According to our knowledge, no available studies investigated the prevalence of partial edentulism among patients in faculty of dentistry Cairo university. Therefore, this study wouldbe of valuable information to oral health planners for proposing strategies that will help dentalhealth care management in faculty of dentistry Cairo,
NCT07037407
In vivo prospective clinical study will be designed, 12 participants will be included. After intraoral scanning, a conventional impression is made for each patient. The groups will be compared for accuracy.
NCT07034079
In conventional maxillary complete dentures, the palatal surface is typically smooth and polished, lacking the natural anatomy of the palatal rugae. While this design facilitates ease of cleaning, it may compromise the functional feedback required for speech and other oral functions. Since the palatal rugae contain mechanoreceptors essential for guiding the tongue during phonation and mastication, replicating these structures may enhance oral function and patient adaptation. Given the variation in clinical outcomes reported in prior studies, a randomized crossover clinical trial is warranted to assess the impact of adding anatomically replicated palatal rugae to complete dentures.