3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques

Edentulism has a significant impact on oral function and quality of life. The use of mandibular implant overdentures supported by two implants is widely considered the minimum standard of care, providing improved stability, function, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional complete dentures. Recently, digital workflows and additive manufacturing (3D printing) have created new opportunities for fabricating complete dentures with improved efficiency and reduced costs. Several impression techniques are currently available for implant-retained overdentures, but there is limited evidence on how these techniques influence functional outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction, particularly when using 3D-printed prostheses. This randomized crossover clinical trial will be conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. Sixteen completely edentulous patients aged 45-70 years will receive two implants placed in the mandibular canine region. After the osseointegration period, each participant will be provided with three different mandibular implant overdentures fabricated using different impression techniques: 1. Conventional open-tray implant-level impression 2. Functionally generated reline impression 3. Mucostatic base with functional borders impression Each overdenture will be worn for a period of three months, with a two-week washout period using a provisional denture before switching to the next overdenture. Randomization will determine the sequence of interventions for each patient. The primary outcome is masticatory efficiency, measured with a color-mixing ability test at 3, 6, and 9 months. The secondary outcome is patient satisfaction, measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the same intervals. The study is designed to provide evidence on whether the choice of impression technique affects clinical and patient-centered outcomes in 3D-printed mandibular implant overdentures.