Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-9 of 9 trials
NCT05105633
Patients presenting to the emergency department with an acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion within 24 hours of stroke onset will be assessed to determine their eligibility for randomization into the trial. If the patient gives informed consent they will be randomised 50:50 using a central computerised allocation process to either standard of care (no intravenous thrombolytic treatment or intravenous alteplase 0.9mg/kg) or tenecteplase 0.25mg/kg before undergoing mechanical thrombectomy as required at treating clinician's discretion. The trial is Multi-arm, Multi-stage, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design with seamless phase 2b/3 transition if the intermediate endpoint (recanalization without symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage) is met in analysis of the first 202 patients. Adaptive sample size re-estimation (Mehta and Pocock) will be performed when 240 patients have completed 3 month follow-up (minimum sample size 320, maximum sample size 688).
NCT05631847
Currently, both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by endovascular treatment (EVT) and EVT alone are widely used for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO) (AIS-BAO), but no direct comparison of their efficacy and safety was reported. Only a limited number of cohort and registry studies have preliminarily compared the two strategies in the treatment of AIS-BAO, with results generally indicating that IVT followed by EVT was slightly superior to EVT alone. However, these findings are generally limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous inclusion and exclusion criteria, different endpoint definitions, and distinct study designs, leading to inconsistent conclusions. Therefore, this study plans to conduct a multicentre, prospective, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of IVT followed by EVT and EVT alone in the treatment of patients with AIS-BAO who are eligible for both treatment strategies within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. This study intends to include patients with AIS due to BAO fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: patients with AIS caused by BAO confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA; IVT can be started within 4.5 hours after symptoms onset; Age ≥ 18 years old; NIHSS score ≥ 6. The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of patients achieving mRS ≤ 2 at 90±14 days after stroke onset.
NCT07046299
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for acute basilar artery occlusion with large core infarcts in a multicenter randomized trial.
NCT05512910
This is a multi-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized, open-label, proof of concept trial to explore possible beneficial effect of adjunctive oral minocycline on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular treatment due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Minocycline has excellent safety profiles, have been previously demonstrated individually to reduce infarction in animal models of stroke, and have potentially mechanisms of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and protection of blood-brain barrier. However, it is not known whether minocycline can reduce futile recanalization of endovascular treatment, and improve the outcome of patients with AIS due to BAO. Eligible and willing subjects will be randomly assigned to the treatment group or the control group. The treatment group will receive 200 mg oral minocycline, followed by 100 mg every 12 hours times for a total of 5 days. Both groups will receive endovascular thrombectomy and standard medical. The treatment with minocycline will start as soon as possible after randomization. Considering the risk of difficulty in feeding tube before EVT, minocycline administered within one hours after EVT is acceptable. Measures of stroke severity and disability will be recorded at baseline and through the follow-up periods (90 days). The evaluator will be blind to the allocation of patients further minimizing the bias.
NCT05615038
Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion.
NCT06924996
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) combined with best medical management (BMM) leads to better functional outcomes than BMM alone in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion with posterior circulation large infarct.
NCT05320263
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) present a devastating, life-threatening prognosis. Urgent recanalization with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is routinely performed in patients with BAO although the level of evidence is lower than that in anterior circulation occlusions (randomization in this population versus medical treatment alone having been impossible in recent studies). Recently, a large retrospective study supports the interest of thrombectomy in this population . Speed and grade of the recanalisation have a major impact on clinical outcome. Favorable outcome at 90 days is strongly associated with the successful recanalization status at the end of the endovascular procedure (OR=4.57, 95%CI=1.24-16.87, P=0.023). First pass effect has been shown to be a strong marker of efficacy of endovascular procedure with significant correlation with clinical outcome. Thrombectomy with Stent retrievers dramatically changed the prognosis of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion strokes and currently used in BAO patients (posterior circulation). Contact aspiration (CA) is currently used in anterior large vessel occlusions (COMPASS trial, Lancet 2019), with similar rates of recanalization and favorable outcomes (Boulanger M, 2019), as well as in BAO patients . However, the benefit of CA compared to SR for the treatment of BAO remains under debate with the superiority of first line CA compared to SR or no difference. Available data are based on retrospective studies with no data from RCT. In this context, a randomized controlled trial is needed to assess the benefit of CA versus SR.
NCT04751708
Rationale: Recently, two prospective multicenter RCT reported a potential beneficial effect of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with an acute symptomatic basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, the high rate of crossover in BEST study and the long-term of recruitment in BASICS study influenced the validity of the results. Besides, a recently prospective clinical registry with large sample size (BASILAR) showed a significantly beneficial effect of EVT in BAO patients. Objective: To assess the effect of EVT in addition to best medical management (BMM) compared to BMM alone, in patients with BAO, caused by a CTA/MRA confirmed occlusion of the basilar artery on functional and safety outcome. Study design: This is a parallel group, randomized clinical trial of EVT with BMM versus BMM. The trial has observer blind assessment of the primary outcome and of neuro-imaging at baseline and follow up. Study population: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and a confirmed basilar artery occlusion by CTA/MRA. Main study parameters/outcomes: The primary effect parameter will be favourable outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-3. The estimate will be adjusted for the known prognostic variables age, pre-stroke mRS, time from onset to randomization, stroke severity (NIHSS) and collaterals and adjusted and unadjusted estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be reported.
NCT02441556
This trial will provide valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion within 8 hours of estimated occlusion time.