Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-8 of 8 trials
NCT06051227
Fentanyl and esketamine are both standard of care for treatment of acute severe traumatic pain in the prehospital setting in the Netherlands. However, it is not known whether they are equally effective and safe. It is also not known whether intranasal (IN) administration of fentanyl or esketamine is equally effective and safe as intravenous (IV) administration. The FORE-PAIN trial is a double-blind multi-arm randomized non-inferiority trial comparing Fentanyl IN, esketamine IV and esketamine IN (intervention arms) to fentanyl IV (comparator arm) for prehospital management of traumatic pain. The investigators hypothesize that all intervention arms provide analgesia that is non-inferior to the comparator arm, and that all study arms are equally safe.
NCT06351137
Prehospital treatment of acute traumatic pain is common in military practice. Analgesics are usually administered intravenously (IV). Research from the civil prehospital environment shows that obtaining IV access can be difficult and time consuming, delaying onset of treatment. The challenges for obtaining IV access in the military prehospital setting are even bigger, for example in combat environments. However, this has not been assessed. Current guidelines also offer alternative routes of administration for analgesics, for example intranasal (IN) administration. IN administration is a fast, easy and effective route of administration. This study determines whether IN administration of analgesia is faster and leads to increased healthcare provider satisfaction compared to IV administration in patients with acute traumatic pain in a simulated military prehospital environment.
NCT04133623
Pain is the leading cause of access to the paediatric emergency department (ED) and present in up to 78% of cases. Acute osteoarticular traumatic pain is often treated inadequately, and there is little data about the best treatment for children. The ibuprofen and ketorolac are respectively the most used and one of the most powerful NSAIDs. In literature, there is no direct comparison between those two medications. The objective of the study depends on the level of pain: * in severe traumatic acute pain (\>=7 points): to evaluate if ketorolac is superior to ibuprofen in the treatment of pain (n=130 children, 65 allocated to ketorolac and 65 to ibuprofen) * in moderate traumatic acute pain (\<7 points): to evaluate if ibuprofen is not inferior to ketorolac in the treatment of pain (n=120 children, 60 allocated to ketorolac and 60 to ibuprofen)
NCT03080350
The purpose of this study is to determine the non-inferiority of the efficacy for prehospital analgesia of sublingual administered fentanyl versus endovenous administered fentanyl for patients with limb trauma on the slope
NCT03080324
The purpose of this study is to determine the non-inferiority of the efficacy of sublingual given fentanyl versus endovenous given fentanyl for patients in the emergency departement.
NCT03247179
This project is a preliminary randomized controlled trial testing the potential impact of the PTSD Coach mobile application at reducing posttraumatic stress and pain symptoms among acutely injured trauma patients. Immediately following the injury, patients will be randomly assigned to use the PTSD Coach app, or to the treatment as usual condition.
NCT03256903
Clinical trial to compare pain relief between methoxyflurane and any analgesic treatment used in usual clinical practice, in patients with trauma and associated pain, treated in Spanish emergency units.
NCT03597945
Prehospital management of traumatic pain is commonly based on morphine while loco-regional analgesia techniques, especially the femoral nerve block (FNB), can be safely and efficiently used. Adjuvants uses can reduce local anesthetic doses and decrease their related risk. The aim of the study was to assess the analgesic effect of Magnesium sulfate (Mg S) when used as adjuvant in prehospital FNB. This is a randomized double-blinded trial conducted in a prehospital medical department of an academic hospital. Patients with isolated diaphysial femoral fracture and eligible to participate were randomized into 2 groups. The Group Placebo had a FNB with 15 ml of lidocaine with epinephrine (300 mg) and 3 ml of normal saline. The Group Magnesium had a FNB with 15 ml of lidocaine with epinephrine (300 mg) and 3 ml of Mg S 15% (450 mg). The FNB was performed according to the WINNIE technique. Primary endpoints were morphine consumption and pain intensity during the first 6 hours. Secondary end-points were the duration of the sensitive block, time to the first analgesic request, side effects occurrence.