Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Browse 8,272 clinical trials for ulcerative colitis. Find studies that match your criteria and connect with research centers.
Find trials near:
Showing 3261-3280 of 8,272 trials
NCT06110052
The present study aims at: A. The main outcome is to compare preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale VAS from 0 to 10 of maximum perceived pain in ladies with OMAs. 1. description of clinical presentation and percentage of OMAs in relation to other Mullerian anomalies 2. description of different subtypes and its percentage. 3. description of the corrective procedures and their short-term outcomes.
NCT00727025
Purpose: The aims of this randomized clinical trial are: 1. to assess scar quality from the patient and surgeon perspectives 2. to assess patient comfort in the days immediately following surgery 3. to assess the time taken to complete closure in the operating room. 4. the financial benefit or cost for the institution of using Steri Strip S will also be estimated. Two closure methods will be compared, a new coaptive film device (Steri Strip S) versus standard subcuticular sutures. The linear incisions will include the standard incision segments utilized for an inverted-T closure for bilateral breast reduction and the transabdominal incision segments utilized for abdominoplasty or TRAM flap harvest. Our hypothesis is that incisions segments closed with Steri Strip S compared to standard subcuticular closure, will yield scars of better cosmetic quality, in shorter time to closure, with novice and expert surgeons, for both bilateral breast reduction and abdominoplasty surgical procedures.
NCT06100757
This prospective, un-blinded, randomized, noninferiority, single centre study with 12 month follow-up included patients who were scheduled for a single-chamber PM implant. Patients were 1:1 randomized to undergo the implantation of a conventional VVI pacing system (Medtronic, Advisa ADSR03) with a ventricular pacing lead (Medtronic, 5076-58) in the right ventricle (called 'conventional group') or to be implanted with a leadless Micra TPS (called 'Micra group'). The primary objective was to assess and compare the mechanical impact of right ventricular pacing using the Micra TPS versus a conventional PM on the left ventricular function.