Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Browse 47,334 clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis. Find studies that match your criteria and connect with research centers.
Find trials near:
Showing 13541-13560 of 47,334 trials
NCT06776666
This study investigates the efficacy of pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to central venous pressure (CVP) in guiding fluid management during intracranial tumor surgeries. Perioperative fluid therapy is critical to prevent complications arising from both hypovolemia (e.g., hypotension, tissue hypoperfusion, ischemia) and hypervolemia (e.g., pulmonary edema, delayed wound healing, infection). Traditional fluid therapy relies on static parameters such as CVP, which have limited sensitivity and specificity. Emerging technologies and dynamic parameters, including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV), offer higher accuracy in evaluating fluid responsiveness. This randomized study includes 42 patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective intracranial tumor surgery under general anesthesia. Patients are classified as ASA I-III and are randomized into two groups: 1. Group N: Fluid therapy guided by PPV. 2. Group S: Fluid therapy guided by CVP. The study follows standard perioperative protocols, with PPV (\>13%) and CVP (0-6 mmHg) used as primary parameters for fluid administration. Key outcomes include intraoperative fluid requirements (primary) and secondary parameters such as serum lactate levels, incidence of hypotension, brain relaxation scores, and ICU length of stay. PPV has been shown to be more reliable than CVP in predicting fluid responsiveness, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients with tidal volumes ≥8 mL/kg. However, its efficacy in neurosurgical patients remains underexplored. This study aims to determine if PPV can replace CVP as a superior guide for fluid therapy, enhancing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.
NCT06269198
The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect on complication severity of using a clinical monitoring system with automatic vital sign alerts in addition to routine monitoring versus routine monitoring alone in high-risk postoperative cancer patients within 30 days after surgery. Other objectives include documentation of the severity of complications within seven days of surgery, frequency of serious adverse events, mortality, length of stay and delay of planned chemotherapy.