Loading clinical trials...
Find 610 clinical trials for diabetes near Massachusetts. Connect with research centers in your area.
Showing 301-320 of 610 trials
NCT00411892
This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). This trial will compare the changes in HbA1c after 26 weeks of inhaled insulin and pioglitazone combination therapy versus pioglitazone treatment alone.
NCT02794155
This will be a Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double blind, titration clinical study, evaluating the efficacy and safety in the HDV Insulin Lispro Group versus Insulin Lispro Group in patients with type 1 diabetes over a 26 week treatment period. The patients will be randomized using a centrally allocated randomization scheme to 1 of the 2 treatment arms in an overall 2:1 scheme (HDV Insulin Lispro: Insulin Lispro). Both arms will receive the randomized treatment in combination with glargine or detemir. Goal to demonstrate that the efficacy of HDV insulin lispro administered in combination with a basal insulin (HDV Insulin Lispro group) is non-inferior to insulin lispro in combination with a basal insulin (Insulin Lispro group), in effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with type 1 diabetes. If non-inferiority is demonstrated, confirm that HDV insulin lispro in combination with a basal insulin (HDV Insulin Lispro group) is superior to insulin lispro in combination with a basal insulin (Insulin Lispro group), in effects on HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes (≥ 0.4% decrease in HbA1c).
NCT01144338
This study will compare the impact of including exenatide once weekly in addition to usual care vs. usual care without exenatide on major cardiovascular outcomes as measured by the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular-related death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke.
NCT02520050
The American Diabetes Association (ADA), among other medical societies, is strongly recommending medical nutrition therapy (MNT) for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. However, the ADA recognized that there is no "one size fits all" diet and thus recommends that MNT should be conducted through a consultation with registered dietitians (RD). Previous studies have shown that using diabetes-specific nutritional formulas, as an integral part of the MNT, lowers postprandial blood glucose levels. Through our experience from the Joslin's Weight Achievement and Intensive Treatment (Why WAIT™) program, applying MNT within a structured dietary intervention protocol has the best impact on blood glucose values and body weight. Meanwhile, the frequent use of health coaching during dietary intervention proved to be effective in managing diabetes and inducing weight loss. However, no study compared those three intervention methods in a randomized clinical study. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different models of conducting medical nutrition therapy on the glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
NCT02896140
The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the percentage of calories from dairy intake and long-term glycemic control and weight maintenance in patients with type 2 diabetes who participate in an intensive lifestyle intervention program. The investigators hypothesize that overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes who consume higher percentage of calories from dairy products during intensive lifestyle intervention programs have better glycemic control and maintenance of weight loss as compared to those who consume lower percentage of calories from dairy products.
NCT02895867
This is a randomized prospective clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes to evaluate the effect of dairy products with full or low fat on glycemic control and cardio-metabolic risk factors in comparison to a regular diet.
NCT02181127
This study will test the hypothesis that a wearable automated bionic pancreas system that automatically delivers glucagon only can prevent or treat hypoglycemia vs. usual care for people with type 1 diabetes \> 21 years old.
NCT01698528
The purpose of this study is to determine if using a diabetes management technology system, including a tablet computer, to track diabetes care and communicate with a clinician coach (a doctor or nurse from the Joslin Clinic) makes starting and adjusting insulin easier and safer for people with type 2 diabetes. Hypothesis: The use of a diabetes management technology system with a clinician coach helps more individuals starting basal insulin achieve better glycemic control with less hypoglycemia compared with standard clinical practice at Joslin Diabetes Center.
NCT00153179
This study will test the hypothesis that reduction in release of free fatty acids from adipocytes will restore insulin-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilation and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in subject with type 2 diabetes.
NCT01421225
The investigators are conducting this study to find out whether a new device can control blood sugar levels in children who have Type 1 diabetes. In Type 1 diabetes, children have high blood sugar levels because they do not make enough insulin. The standard treatment is to give insulin either by shots or using an insulin pump. A new device, called closed-loop insulin therapy, uses a continuous glucose monitor (CGMs) linked to an insulin pump by a computer. The CGM will send the sugar levels to a computer which automatically figures out how much insulin to give and then gives that amount of insulin through the insulin pump. It will give the child insulin to bring sugar levels down if they are high, and will give less insulin if the child's blood sugar is getting lower. Earlier research using closed-loop insulin therapy has shown the ability for it to improve diabetes care in adults and older children, but there has been no research of closed-loop insulin therapy in young children. This study will compare children's current insulin therapy with the closed-loop system. The knowledge that the investigators gain from this research will help us to figure out whether closed-loop therapy can work in young children, hopefully leading to better Type 1 diabetes care.
NCT02969863
To conduct an outpatient study testing two configurations of the bionic pancreas (bi-hormonal and insulin-only) with and without remote monitoring of hypoglycemia in 25 adult (≥ 18 years of age) subjects with type 1 diabetes in a random-order crossover study versus usual care with an insulin pump with and without remote monitoring of hypoglycemia.
NCT02551874
This research study of subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) will compare the glycemic control (measured by HbA1c) in subjects co-administered saxagliptin and dapagliflozin, in addition to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, to subjects receiving insulin glargine, in addition to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, over a treatment period of 52 weeks.
NCT01819129
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and North America. The aim of the trial is to compare FIAsp (faster-acting insulin aspart) to insulin aspart, both in combination with insulin glargine and metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
NCT02463097
This study is a single-arm, multi-center, Home and Hotel Clinical Investigation in subjects with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the closed loop algorithm that is built into the 670G insulin pump is safe as part of the overall system.
NCT01032629
The study will assess canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with regard to cardiovascular (CV) risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Other objectives include evaluating the overall safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of canagliflozin. The data from this study will be combined with the data from CANVAS-R study (Study of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal Endpoints in Adult Subjects with T2DM, NCT01989754) in a pre-specified integrated analysis of CV safety outcomes to satisfy US FDA post-marketing requirements for canagliflozin.
NCT02091362
The main purpose of the trial is to determine the effect of a study drug known as LY2409021 on blood pressure and pulse rate in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) when compared to placebo. The study has two periods. Each participant will receive LY2409021 or placebo in each period. At least 4 weeks will pass between periods. The study will last about 23 weeks for each participant. Participants may remain on stable dose metformin, as prescribed by their personal physician.
NCT02738151
Primary Objective: To demonstrate the noninferiority in the efficacy of Toujeo® to Tresiba® in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from Baseline to Week 24. Secondary Objectives: Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Week 12 To assess the effects of the insulin Toujeo® in comparison with insulin Tresiba® at week 12 and week 24 on: * Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG); * Change in Fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and 4-point SMPG and 8-point SMPG profile; * Percentage of participants reaching HbA1c targets \<7% or ≤6.5%; * Percentage of participants reaching HbA1c targets \<7% or ≤6.5% without severe and/or confirmed hypoglycemia * Frequency of occurrence and diurnal distribution of hypoglycemia by American Diabetes Association (ADA) category of hypoglycemia. To assess the safety in each treatment group. To assess the treatment effects in each treatment group on Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO). Percentage of participants requiring rescue therapy.
NCT00282971
To assess the impact on glucose control by inhaled insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not well controlled on 2 or more oral anti-diabetic agents
NCT00523042
This trial is conducted in Europe, Asia, Oceania and the United States of America (USA). This is a one-year clinical trial to compare the safety of inhaled preprandial human insulin to subcutaneous insulin aspart in subjects with type 1 or 2 diabetes and asthma.
NCT03169530
The Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial (MACH15) is a multicenter, worldwide, randomized clinical trial of \~15 gm of alcohol daily versus abstention, using a balanced parallel design and single-blind assessment of all outcomes among approximately 7,800 participants aged 50 years and older with advanced cardiovascular risk. Intervention will average 6 years in duration with a common close-out date. Following recruitment and pre-screening, participants will attend a screening visit followed by a two-week abstention washout period, a baseline visit and randomization, and subsequent visits at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually until close-out.
