Early Versus Late Stopping of Antibiotics in Adults With High-risk Hematological Malignancies/Receiving Cellular Therapies and Fever

This study is designed to assess the safety, benefits and impacts of early cessation of empiric antibiotics in all fever (both pre-neutropenic (PNF) and neutropenic (NF)) that develops post conditioning or chemotherapy until count recovery in high-risk hematology patients who meet clear inclusion criteria. This is in recognition of the fact that both PNF and NF are often not infective in nature, and that cessation is likely an important and safe approach in both scenarios. Secondly, the patient's pre-neutropenic and neutropenic status is highly fluid and can rapidly change from one to the other (within a day), making strict definitions of neutropenia arbitrary and not particularly useful for implementation in the clinical setting. Furthermore, as a programmatic-type intervention that is embedded in clinical workflow, approaching high-risk patients with fever in a standardized way would enable consistency and inform clear and concise management protocols. Stratification will allow for assessment of each patient sub-group to provide more granular data. As an Australian first, this study will exploit the full potential of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, embedding all key aspects of the trial including screening, randomization and data collection into standard clinical and EMR workflows. This highly novel and innovative clinical trial methodology has the potential to improve trial efficiency, data quality and transferability between healthcare centers and will systematically evaluate the barriers and enablers of embedded trials (ELSA-EMR). The study hypothesizes that early cessation of antibiotics in adult patients with high risk fever is safe, acceptable, cost-effective and will minimize an unnecessarily prolonged health care intervention