Families Moving Forward Bridges: An Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers With PAE With or At-risk for FASD

This is an unblinded, feasibility study of an adapted positive parenting intervention to be carried out in a small sample (n=12 dyads) of young children with FASD and their primary caregiver in King County, WA.

This is an initial feasibility study to examine Families Moving Forward Bridges (FMF Bridges), an FASD-informed early intervention designed to meet the specific needs of young children 6-36 months with prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) or FASD and their caregivers. FMF Bridges was developed by this research team and is adapted from a scientifically-validated positive parenting intervention (Families Moving Forward) shown to be efficacious with preschool and school-aged children affected by PAE or FASD. FMF Bridges merges key components of FASD-informed care with family-centered and relationship-based early intervention practices and is designed to be delivered in community-based early intervention programs. The FMF Bridges early intervention needs to be tested with children and families in the community-based early intervention settings for which it was designed. The study team plans to evaluate the feasibility of FMF Bridges in a small community trial. the team will partner with an early intervention program that has a high population of children with prenatal alcohol exposure. EI providers will be trained as FMF Bridges Specialists and deliver the intervention to a total of 12 dyads (young child and their primary caregiver). Dyads will receive ten 60-minute manualized FMF Bridges intervention sessions over 3-5 months (approximately every other week) from community EI providers trained as FMF Bridges Specialists. Primary Aim 1: Examine the feasibility of implementing the FMF Bridges early intervention in a community early intervention setting. The study will focus on answering the questions: 1) Is it practical to implement the FMF Bridge intervention in a community EI setting? 2) Can the intervention be implemented with fidelity? 3) Is the intervention acceptable to providers and caregivers? and 4) What refinements might be needed to improve the feasibility of implementation?