A Trial of Actazin Versus PEG 3350 for Maintenance Therapy in Children With Constipation

The goal of this pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial is to determine whether Actazin (kiwifruit extract) is a feasible and effective alternative to polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) for maintenance therapy in children with functional constipation (FC). This study will include children aged 4 to 17 years who meet the Rome IV criteria for functional constipation. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is it feasible to conduct a definitive, multi-centre trial comparing Actazin to PEG 3350 in children with FC? 2. What are the within-group differences in clinical outcomes such as stool frequency, abdominal pain, and laxative use over a 4-week period? Researchers will compare chewable Actazin tablets with placebo PEG 3350 powder to PEG 3350 powder with placebo Actazin tablets to see if Actazin is a viable non-pharmacologic natural health product alternative for treating FC. Participants will: Undergo an initial bowel cleanout using PEG 3350 and bisacodyl. Following, they will be randomized to one of two groups: 1. Actazin chewable tablets (titrate to effect: 600-2400 mg/day) + placebo PEG 3350 2. PEG 3350 (dose based on age and titratable to effect) + placebo Actazin chewable tablets Participants will take the assigned intervention daily for 4 weeks and complete a daily bowel diary recording stool frequency, consistency (Bristol Stool Scale), abdominal pain, and laxative use. They will have weekly follow-ups via phone or electronic survey to assess adherence, medication use, and adverse events. Additionally, a bi-weekly follow-up will be conducted for an additional 8 weeks to track longer-term outcomes. Outcomes: Primary feasibility outcomes include consent rate, adherence to allocated intervention, and 4-week follow-up completion rate. Secondary clinical outcomes include resolution of FC (Rome IV criteria), weekly stool frequency, abdominal pain episodes, use of rescue laxatives, and treatment palatability. This study is being conducted at McMaster Children's Hospital and is funded by the Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization (HAHSO). Data collection will be managed using the Lumedi™ platform, and safety will be overseen by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).

This pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Actazin (kiwifruit extract) versus polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) as a maintenance therapy for children with functional constipation (FC). The study follows a double-dummy, quadruple-masked, single-centre design to ensure blinding of participants, caregivers, healthcare providers, and investigators. The trial will enroll children aged 4 to 17 years diagnosed with functional constipation based on Rome IV criteria, recruited from the emergency department (ED) and outpatient clinics at McMaster Children's Hospital (MCH). The study will examine whether a larger, multi-centre trial is feasible based on recruitment rates, adherence to the intervention, and follow-up retention. Study Design This is a randomized, double-dummy, quadruple-masked feasibility trial evaluating Actazin against PEG 3350 for the maintenance management of pediatric FC. Sixty participants will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: Intervention group: Actazin chewable tablets (600 mg starting dose, titrated up to 2,400 mg daily) + placebo PEG 3350 powder Comparator group: PEG 3350 powder (age-based dose) + placebo Actazin chewable tablets Participants and caregivers, bedside clinicians, outcome assessors, and investigators will all be masked to the treatment allocation. The study will last 4 weeks, followed by an additional 8-week observational follow-up to assess longer-term adherence and clinical effects. Randomization \& Blinding: Conducted using block randomization (blocks of 2, 4, or 6) through the Hamilton Health Sciences (HHS) Research Pharmacy. Participants will receive identically packaged drug kits containing either active treatment or placebo. Data Collection \& Monitoring Participants and caregivers will complete a daily bowel diary electronically. Weekly remote follow-ups (phone or electronic survey) will monitor adherence, medication use, and any adverse events. The final statistical analysis will include descriptive and exploratory methods, reporting mean differences and confidence intervals for clinical outcomes. Statistical Analysis Plan Feasibility analysis will be based on progression criteria: If all feasibility outcomes meet the predefined thresholds, the trial will proceed to a definitive multi-centre RCT. If one or more outcomes fall below feasibility thresholds, protocol modifications will be considered. Clinical outcomes will be analyzed using linear regression (continuous variables) and logistic regression (binary outcomes). Adverse event rates will be compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. No formal hypothesis testing for efficacy will be conducted, as this is a pilot feasibility trial.