Loading clinical trials...

RCT Comparing KS Versus TS for Ovedenture | Clinical Trials | Clareo Health

NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNA

RCT Comparing KS Versus TS for Ovedenture

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Titanium Grade V (KS) Versus Titanium Grade IV (TS) Implants for the Treatment of Edentulous Mandible

NCT06276712•Università degli Studi di Sassari

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of KS implants used to rehabilitate edentulous mandible with dental-retained overdentures, and to compare it with same treatment on TS implants

Eligibility

Age

18 - No limit years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Inclusion Criteria

•Any edentulous patient (post-extractive sites must to be healed from at least 3 months), with sufficient bone height and width in the anterior mandible (between canines) to allow the placement of two implants of 3.5 mm diameter of at least 8.5 mm of length.
•18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent.
•Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes/day); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes/day).
•In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healing for at least 3 months before being treated in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

•General contraindications to implant surgery.
•Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.
•Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.
•Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
•Patients with untreated periodontitis.
•Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
•Previous guided bone reconstruction at the intended implant sites.
•Uncontrolled diabetes.
•Pregnancy or nursing.
•Substance abuser.
+6 more criteria

Key Dates

Start Date

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion Date

December 30, 2024

Completion Date

January 30, 2028

Last Updated

February 26, 2024

Enrollment

ESTIMATED participants

Conditions

Dental ImplantDental Implant-Abutment DesignEdentulous Jaw

Interventions

Implant placement with 3.5 mm diameter KS implants.

DEVICE

Implant placement with 3.5 mm diameter TS implants.

DEVICE

L-PRF Versus Sticky Bone Grafting of the Jumping Gap in AI-assisted Computer-Guided Socket Shield Immediate Implantation

NCT07433920

Dental Implant Failed

View study

RECRUITINGNA

Hard Tissue Augmentation With or Without Connective Tissue Graft in Immediate Esthetic Implants

NCT07333534

Dental Implant

View study

RECRUITINGNA

Clinical Performance of Dual-cantilevered Single-implant Bridge

NCT06099717

Data Source & Attribution

This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

ClinicalTrials.gov last update: February 26, 2024Data synced to Clareo: March 29, 2026

Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.

View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions

RCT Comparing KS Versus TS for Ovedenture

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

L-PRF Versus Sticky Bone Grafting of the Jumping Gap in AI-assisted Computer-Guided Socket Shield Immediate Implantation

Hard Tissue Augmentation With or Without Connective Tissue Graft in Immediate Esthetic Implants

Clinical Performance of Dual-cantilevered Single-implant Bridge

Primary Stability and Peri-implant Outcomes of Short Implants in Post-extraction Single-tooth Sites

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants

Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement