Finite Versus Continuous Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection imposes a serious threat to global public health, affecting more than 250 million individuals around the world. In the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), treatment with nucleos(t)ide analog (Nuc) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes including occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver-related mortality, and overall mortality. Nuc therapy, however, cannot exterminate HBV and so continuous treatment is usually required to sustain viral inhibition. Seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) predicts durable remission off Nuc and may serve as the treatment endpoint, but it rarely occurs with current regimen. Therefore, long-term to indefinite treatment is currently recommended. In view of various concerns such as drug exposure, adherence, and expense for a treatment course that could be lifelong, a finite strategy of Nuc therapy was proposed to allow treatment withdrawal prior to HBsAg seroclearance. Another major reason for the finite strategy is a higher chance of HBsAg seroclearance following treatment cessation. Nevertheless, viral replication almost always reactivates and often leads to clinical flares. While an episode of acute flare might be self-limited or even conducive to HBsAg seroclearance, it could progress to acute on chronic liver failure with fatal consequences. Risks of these serious outcomes following treatment withdrawal need to be accurately quantified in order to inform the practice of finite Nuc therapy. Existent literature on the efficacy and safety of finite Nuc therapy remained very limited, as recently shown in a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hall and colleagues. In order to close the gaps in current knowledge, the investigators conduct this multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine if cessation of Nuc is safe and conducive to HBsAg seroclearance.