Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Liposomal Irinotecan in Older Patients With Treatment Naïve Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (GIANT)
This phase II trial compares two treatment combinations: gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel, or fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with pancreatic cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, nab-paclitaxel, fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and liposomal irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. This study may help doctors find out which treatment combination is better at prolonging life in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Overall survival. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Progression-free survival. II. Objective tumor response. III. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)/quality of life (QOL) related objectives: IIIa. Hypothesize that lower scores in functional status assessment tool - instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) will correlate with higher rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity. IV. CGA/QOL related exploratory objectives: IVa. Evaluation of other pre-treatment CGA domains including co-morbidities, depression, nutrition and cognition as predictors of chemotherapy tolerance. IVb. Evaluation of the association between change in functional status during treatment course (comparison between activities of daily living \[ADL\] and IADL score pre-treatment and at time of disease evaluation) as predictors of chemotherapy tolerance. IVc. Evaluation of the correlation between CGA domains and overall survival by treatment arm. IVd. Evaluation of the difference in QOL scores (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatitis \[FACT-Hep\] version 4) between baseline measures and assessment during treatment course between by treatment arms. V. Focused evaluation of toxicities that are of interest for older patients including: peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, falls, emergency room visits, hospitalization, treatment modification and discontinuation. VI. Imaging correlative study objectives: VIa. Evaluate the association between baseline and change during treatment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity experienced on treatment. VIb. Evaluate the association between baseline and change during treatment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and overall survival among older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. VIc. Evaluate the association between baseline and change during treatment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and geriatric assessment scores evaluating functional status. VII. Laboratory correlative study objectives: VIIa. Evaluation of the correlation between base line levels of biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity during therapy. VIIb. Evaluation of the correlation between changes in levels of CRP and IL-6 during therapy and rates of grade 3 chemotherapy toxicity. VIIc. Evaluation of the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and overall survival among older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. VIId. Evaluation of the correlation between levels of baseline biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and geriatric assessments scores evaluation functional status. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive gemcitabine intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes and nab-paclitaxel IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 46 hours starting on day 1. Patients also receive leucovorin IV over 90-120 minutes and liposomal irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years.
Age
70 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Thomas Hospital
Fairhope, Alabama, United States
Mobile Infirmary Medical Center
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Anchorage Associates in Radiation Medicine
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Anchorage Radiation Therapy Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Anchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Katmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Start Date
August 26, 2020
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2026
Completion Date
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
March 2, 2026
176
ACTUAL participants
Fluorouracil
DRUG
Gemcitabine
DRUG
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
DRUG
Leucovorin
DRUG
Leucovorin Calcium
DRUG
Liposomal Irinotecan
DRUG
Nab-paclitaxel
DRUG
Quality-of-Life Assessment
OTHER
Questionnaire Administration
OTHER
Lead Sponsor
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Collaborators
NCT05053971
NCT04550494
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions