Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) is identified as one of the most effective treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a wide range of trauma populations, with a higher effect size than any other evidence-based treatments for PTSD. However, CPT has been shown to be somewhat less effective in active duty and veteran populations when compared to civilian trauma victims. One reason may be that service members have difficulty committing to a six-week course of therapy due to the demanding nature of active duty military operations schedules. In addition, limited availability of clinical providers may reduce access to care. One way to address these barriers may be to administer CPT in an intensive, 5-day format. This format may increase rates of treatment completion and produce faster symptom improvement than the standard administration of CPT. This study will test the efficacy of massed CPT (MCPT) compared to standard CPT delivery. MCPT will be delivered in an intensive outpatient setting (12 sessions in 5 days) composed of both group and individual sessions. Standard delivery of CPT consists of 12 sessions over 6 weeks and involves only individual sessions.
The sample includes 140 active duty service members randomized to receive either MCPT or standard CPT. Participants will be assessed 4 times during the course of the study. In order to test the equivalence of the treatment conditions, outcomes will be compared at a consistent number of weeks posttreatment for each condition (e.g., at baseline, and one month and 4 months following the conclusion of the therapy). Additionally, in order to compare the treatment groups at the same point in actual time, each group will be assessed at the one month posttreatment time point for the other condition. The timing of these assessment intervals allows for the comparison groups to be assessed similarly at each important juncture of therapy (baseline and post-treatment) and also to be assessed for maintenance of treatment gains following a similar passage of time (4 months post-treatment). Those who drop out of treatment will be asked to return for the follow-up assessments based on their projected end date for inclusion in the intent to treat analyses.
Aim 1: To evaluate the efficacy of massed CPT in a sample of active duty military in reductions of clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD symptoms, as well as secondary outcomes including depression, psychosocial functioning, and physical health after treatment completion (assessed at one month and 4 months posttreatment for each condition). Rates of treatment completion and speed of recovery will also be compared between conditions.
Aim 2: To examine predictors of symptom reduction in each treatment condition including demographic characteristics, military factors, psychosocial variables, and comorbid mental health symptoms.
Aim 3 (Exploratory): To evaluate the tolerability of massed versus standard administration of CPT. Important nonspecific factors such as therapeutic alliance, patient preference, treatment expectancy, perceived burden, and emotional factors such as anxiety and avoidance will be examined with regard to treatment outcome.
To test the hypotheses regarding noninferiority of the MCPT treatment condition relative to CPT, 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in CAPS scores (and other measures) between conditions will be constructed for each measurement period. MCPT will be deemed noninferior to CPT, thus supporting hypotheses 1 and 2 if the upper limit of the CI is less than 10 for CAPS - the a priori specified noninferiority margin.
To examine differences in treatment completion between conditions, frequencies (and proportions) in a chi-square test of independence will be used. That is, if 70 participants begin the study in each condition, the proportion that drops out prior to completion of treatment is expected to be significantly less in the MCPT condition. To examine speed of recovery, scores on outcomes at 5 weeks from baseline (one month post treatment for MCPT, mid-treatment for CPT) will be compared via an a priori specified t-test.
In addition, a multilevel approach to analyzing longitudinal data 95 using the Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models package from 96 will be utilized for further tests and exploration of changes in measures of PTSD and secondary outcomes. Multilevel modeling is ideal for studies which employ repeated measurements nested within individuals such as is the case in this design. To examine individual predictors of symptom reduction (Aim 2), the four measurement occasions will be leveraged to assess both group and individual differences in trajectories for each of the study outcomes. Individual difference variables will be added to the models as moderators of condition and time (i.e., to what extent do change patterns vary by these individual variables?). For Aim 3, a similar strategy will be used but leveraging the nonspecific factors as the outcomes and session as the time variable. Thus, the extent to which nonspecific factors change as a function of treatment condition over the sessions will be examined.
Lastly, an additional one-year follow-up assessment was added as an exploratory aim to examine longer-term outcomes.
