Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Nasal High Flow Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Although non-invasive ventilation (NIV) usage has increased significantly over time in COPD exacerbation, a great percentage of patients (\~30%) present contraindications to NIV or cannot tolerate it. Nasal high flow (NHF) has been introduced for the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure in adults with favorable effects on ventilation and respiratory mechanics. The above mentioned NHF positive effects has been observed also in stable COPD patients with or without chronic hypercapnia. In this study, the investigators hypothesize that NHF is not inferior to NIV for respiratory support in patients with COPD exacerbation and acute or acute on chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.
The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in COPD exacerbation has increased significantly over time since it has been shown to improve acute respiratory acidosis (increases pH and decreases PaCO2), decrease respiratory rate, work of breathing, severity of breathlessness and therefore reduce mortality and intubation rates. Despite all these favorable effect, a great percentage of patients (\~30%) present contraindications to NIV or cannot tolerate it increasing thus the possibility of NIV failure and consequently intubation rates. Over the past decade, nasal high flow (NHF) oxygen therapy has been introduced for the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure in adults. NHF can generate high flow rates up to 60 L·min-1 and through this mechanism exerts its positive effects on respiratory mechanics, carbon dioxide washout, patient's respiratory rate and work of breathing. Although the above mentioned NHF positive effects has been observed also in stable COPD patients with or without chronic hypercapnia, NHF use in COPD exacerbation is questionable and only a few case reports studies have been published showing favorable effects of NHF on COPD exacerbation. In this study, the investigators hypothesize that NHF is not inferior to NIV for respiratory support in patients with COPD exacerbation and acute or acute on chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Age
40 - 85 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Venizeleio Hospital
Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Evangelismos Hospital
Athens, Greece
University General Hospital of Larisa
Larissa, Greece
Start Date
April 15, 2018
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2020
Completion Date
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
February 20, 2020
498
ESTIMATED participants
Nasal High Flow
DEVICE
Non-Invasive Ventilation
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Evangelismos Hospital
Collaborators
NCT07477600
NCT05878769
NCT06717659
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions