Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Instrumentation Using Reciproc and ProTaper Next in Asymptomatic Necrotic Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Comparing the postoperative pain resulting after mechanical instrumentation using Reciproc reciprocating files versus that resulting after using ProTaper Next rotary files in asymptomatic necrotic molars.
Asymptomatic Necrotic molars are selected according to the eligibility and exclusion criteria and patients are then randomized to receive treatment either using Reciproc Files or ProTaper Next files. Postoperative pain is then assessed using the Numerical Rating scale 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours post-instrumentation. The tooth is then temporized and after 1 week obturation is then and post obturation pain is assessed using the Numerical Rating scale after 12 and 24 hours following obturation. The time required to complete instrumentation is also measured and compared using the two files.
Age
15 - 55 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Cairo university
Cairo, Egypt
Start Date
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion Date
October 14, 2017
Completion Date
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 7, 2017
60
ACTUAL participants
Reciproc files in reciprocating motion
PROCEDURE
ProTaper Next files in continuous rotary motion
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
NCT03376984
NCT01827098
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions