Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Development of Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 and Inert Fluorinated Gas Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparative Pilot Study of Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Pulmonary Disease
Aim of this study is to evaluate image quality and reproducibility of Xenon-129 and Inert fluorinated (19F) gas Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to evaluate changes in lung structure and function in participants with cystic fibrosis (CF) and asthma compared to healthy controls.
Hyperpolarized noble gas magnetic resonance (MR) lung imaging is a relatively new imaging method that allows depiction of both lung function and morphology. Hyperpolarized gases are a new class of MR contrast agent which, when inhaled, provide high temporal and spatial resolution MR images of the lung airspaces. Since no ionizing radiation is involved, hyperpolarized gas MR imaging is ideal for the evaluation of lung diseases especially in children. With hyperpolarized gases, the nuclear spins of the gas atoms are brought into alignment outside of the MR scanner via a process called optical pumping; this yields high polarizations and permits visualization of the lung airspaces with MR imaging (despite the low physical density of the gas in the lung). Two non-radioactive (i.e. stable) isotopes of noble gases helium-3 and xenon-129 can be hyperpolarized. Until recently, higher polarizations could be achieved with helium-3 than with xenon-129, so in humans, helium-3 was more commonly used for hyperpolarized gas MR imaging of the lungs. Recently, the technology has been developed to provide large quantities of highly polarized xenon-129. Helium-3 gas is also extremely expensive and since there are limited reserves of the gas, difficult to procure for research. Unlike helium-3, since xenon-129 is naturally present in the atmosphere, it is less expensive and easier to procure for imaging. Several applications of xenon-129 MR imaging are under development, including diffusion-weighted and relaxation-weighted imaging. These techniques take advantage of the fact that the rate of loss of xenon-129 polarization is significantly influenced by the local blood flow and concentration of molecular oxygen, as well as the restriction of xenon-129 diffusion by small airway space dimensions. These data can be used to create maps of the lung reflecting regional ventilation/perfusion and micro-airway sizes. Other data that can be obtained with xenon-129 MRI include the volumes of ventilated and unventilated lungs which can subsequently be analyzed to determine the homogeneity of gas distribution within the airspaces. These data can be used to study the structural and functional changes taking place in the lungs associated with pulmonary diseases like CF and asthma. It might provide a diagnostic tool that is able to detect pulmonary diseases more sensitively than the current gold standard measurements of spirometry and plethysmography, and thus prevent irreparable and irreversible damage to the lungs in the early stages of disease. 19F MRI is an emergent technology for the imaging of lung ventilation and function. Similar to HP 129Xe MRI, this technique involves the imaging of an inhaled tracer (inert fluorinated gases) to visualize the airspaces of the lungs. Fluorinated gases such as perfluoropropane have been approved for use as an investigational inhaled contrast at several institutions globally, including a Canadian institution in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Fluorinated gases are non-toxic, commercially available, relatively inexpensive, and have favourable physical/magnetic properties for MRI17-20. Most importantly, unlike 129Xe MRI, fluorinated gases do not require hyperpolarization prior to imaging to boost detectable signal, instead relying on a relatively high number of 19F atoms per molecule and rapid, repeated imaging to enable sufficient signal averaging3. This is a significant advantage compared to HP 129Xe MRI which requires special polarizing equipment; a major barrier to widespread implementation. Despite this, the achievable image quality is generally poorer than 129Xe MRI. Nevertheless, recent improvements in hardware, software and fluorinated gases may enable 19F MRI to provide similar and/or complimentary information compared to HP 129Xe MRI at lower cost and with reduced requirements for hardware and infrastructure21. Additionally, the paramagnetism of molecular oxygen (O2), which detrimentally impacts the hyperpolarization of 129Xe, does not significantly impact inert fluorinated gases. Therefore, these gases may be prepared in normoxic mixtures prior to administration to participants, rather than in anoxic mixtures as is typically done with 129Xe. This, alongside the fact that irreversible loss of magnetization is not a concern with fluorinated gases, presents the opportunity to perform free-breathing, extended imaging of the lungs. Imaging data acquired during free-breathing can potentially resolve gas kinetics (i.e., gas-wash-in, wash-out, and fractional ventilation)22,23 in a manner that is more feasible and tolerable than with HP noble gases. Due to the lack of studies evaluating 19F MRI in pediatric lung disease, in this study we aim to develop and test necessary hardware/software for 19F MRI of the lungs children with and without history of respiratory disease and compare to HP 129Xe MRI.
Age
8 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Start Date
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2026
Completion Date
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
March 2, 2026
30
ESTIMATED participants
Xenon-129 and Perfluoropropane (19F)
DRUG
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
DEVICE
Lung Clearance Index
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT07486401