Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-8 of 8 trials
NCT06819306
The goal of this randomized controlled study is to assess the clinical performance and safety of Hedia Diabetes Assistant in adults with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control in France. The main question to answer is: \- Does Hedia Diabetes Assistant improve glycemic control? Researchers will compare Hedia Diabetes Assistant in addition to standard treatment to standard treatment alone to see if Hedia Diabetes Assistant can improve glycemic control. Subjects will: * Use Hedia Diabetes Assistant in addition to their standard treatment or only use standard treatment for 6 months. * Visit the clinic once when they are included into the study and will otherwise be followed remotely. * Fill out questionnaires when they are included and after 6 months.
NCT07452393
This is a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study of young people aged 10 to 25 with type 1 diabetes in Spain, affiliated with a diabetes association or federation. Data will be collected through an online questionnaire in which participants voluntarily and anonymously self-report their responses. The study aims to assess psychological factors (psychological distress, risk of eating disorders, and self-perceived health status), health care behaviors (treatment adherence, diet, and physical activity), and sociodemographic data, exploring differences by age and sex and examining associations between variables.
NCT07427134
This is a multi-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a flexible digital insulin dose calculator in children under 12 years of age with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) managed with multiple daily injections (MDI). Participants will be stratified by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use and baseline HbA1c, and randomised to receive either standard care alone or standard care plus the insulin dose calculator tool for 6 months. The primary outcome is the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes include CGM-derived glycaemic metrics (Time in Range, Time Below Range, Time Above Range, and Coefficient of Variation), total daily insulin dose (units/kg/day), healthcare provider contact frequency, and caregiver-reported usability and satisfaction. The study aims to determine whether the use of a structured digital decision-support tool improves glycaemic control and supports safer insulin dosing in paediatric patients with T1DM.
NCT07195045
Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is one of the most common and disabling complications of diabetes mellitus, substantially affecting quality of life, daily functioning, and health system burden. Early identification of PDN is crucial for timely treatment, prevention of complications such as foot ulcers and amputations, and for reducing healthcare costs. However, in Thailand there are limited culturally adapted and validated tools for screening PDN. PainPREDICT is an internationally validated questionnaire designed to characterize neuropathic pain profiles, but its adaptation for Thai patients has not yet been undertaken. In parallel, the use of mobile health technologies (mHealth) has the potential to expand access to screening and monitoring of chronic conditions, particularly in resource-limited settings.
NCT06845891
This clinical study evaluates the impact of the Cap INSULCLOCK device on glycemic control, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Despite advances in pharmacology and technology, a significant proportion of individuals with T1DM fail to achieve recommended glycemic targets, partly due to the complexity of insulin therapy and suboptimal adherence. Cap INSULCLOCK is a device that attaches to insulin pens, automatically recording injections and integrating data on glucose levels, insulin administration, food intake, and physical activity, with real-time Bluetooth transmission. Its use may enhance adherence and optimize metabolic control. This study is a randomized, low-intervention clinical trial conducted at a single center, enrolling 42 patients, who will be randomized into two groups: one using the activated device and a control group using the device in a blinded mode. The primary objective is to assess differences in time above range (TAR \>180 mg/dL) over the last 14 days of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Secondary objectives include evaluating HbA1c levels, time in range (TIR), frequency of hypoglycemic episodes, and patient satisfaction. Data will be analyzed using advanced statistical methods, and the intervention is expected to improve adherence, reduce glycemic variability, and enhance quality of life in individuals with T1DM
NCT06892821
Achieving glycemic targets with improved T1DM management reduces diabetes complications and the risk of progression. Thus, it is essential to identify the challenges in T1DM management within the country and develop strategies for improvement. In Türkiye, there is limited multicenter data regarding the clinical characteristics of children and adolescents with T1DM during the diagnosis and treatment process. This multicenter prospective cohort study aimed to determine the diagnostic and follow-up characteristics of children and adolescents with T1DM, assess the status of diabetes management in the country.
NCT06635460
This clinical study aims to determine the effects of motivational interviewing and social media-based patient monitoring on metabolic control and self-efficacy in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Additionally, the study will assess the adolescents\' attitudes toward their disease, quality of life, and perceived levels of social support. The primary research questions are as follows: For adolescents with Type 1 diabetes who receive motivational interviewing and social media-based monitoring: How do their attitudes toward their disease compare to those in the control group? How do their perceived levels of social support compare to those in the control group? How do their self-efficacy levels compare to those in the control group? How does their quality of life compare to that of the control group? How do their HbA1c levels compare to those in the control group?
NCT04141423
Multi-centre, open label, multiple ascending dose trial in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus