Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-5 of 5 trials
NCT07608289
Tooth extraction leads to a substantial reduction in alveolar bone volume, with up to 25% loss within the first year and up to 40-60% within three years. This prospective randomized clinical study aims to compare four commonly used methods of alveolar ridge preservation, evaluating their effectiveness in maintaining bone volume for later prosthetic or implant rehabilitation. Alveolar dimensions will be measured using calibrated CBCT imaging pre-extraction and at six months post-extraction.
NCT07257328
The aim of this study is to compare extraction socket healing (SH) following surgical extraction of lower third molars (LTMs) with and without the application of injectable platelet rich fibrine (i-PRF). A minimum of 32 participants will be included. One mandibular third molar per participant will be randomly assigned to the control group and the contralateral tooth to the test group. SH, gingival recession, and distal periodontal pocket depth of the adjacent second molar will be assessed, and outcomes compared between sides.
NCT06624982
The main purpose of the study is to measure and localize immediate post extraction changes i.e. socket expansion versus no width change along the socket wall and identify whether the immediate post-extraction ridge width condition (expansion or no change) is a determinant of buccolingual ridge width and height changes 4 months following extraction and ridge preservation.
NCT06970184
Observational, prospective study conducted on patients requiring tooth extractions followed by ARP and subsequent implant placement.
NCT06611865
Local anaesthesia or numbing is done before tooth extraction. This study compares two different methods of numbing molar teeth before extraction. It compares them on the basis of pain during the procedure and on discomfort after the procedure as well. It will help dentists better understand the benefits of the two techniques, and their usage case to case.