Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-10 of 10 trials
NCT07052045
Stroke, especially acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain, is a leading cause of death and long-term disability. When the blockage is in a large blood vessel, a procedure called endovascular therapy (EVT)-where the clot is removed using a catheter-is highly effective. However, the sooner EVT is done, the better the outcome for the patient. Research has shown that delays between arriving at the hospital and starting EVT (called door-to-groin time) significantly reduce the chances of recovery. For example, reducing this time by just 15 minutes can mean 20 more patients (out of 1,000 treated) going home instead of to a care facility. Even a 10-minute improvement can result in over 100 extra days of independent living for patients and save more than $10,000 in healthcare costs per patient. To reduce these delays, hospitals have improved stroke workflows. In the current standard approach, patients suspected of having a stroke are taken first to a CT scan room to confirm the diagnosis, and then, if a treatable occlusion is found, to a separate room for EVT. This usually takes around 60-70 minutes. However, moving patients between rooms takes time. A new approach called "One-Stop management" could solve this. In this method, both the brain scan and the EVT procedure are done in one room-the angiography suite-using special imaging tools called flat panel CT (FDCT) and FDCT angiography (FDCT-A). A previous study with 230 patients showed that One-Stop management is possible and saves time. But there's a challenge: the decision to follow the One-Stop pathway is made before a clear diagnosis is available. That's important because not all strokes benefit from EVT. Severe stroke symptoms (measured by a score called NIHSS ≥10) can come from: * A large or medium vessel blockage (which EVT can treat), * A small vessel blockage, or * A bleed in the brain (hemorrhage). Only the first group benefits from EVT. About 85% of patients with severe symptoms fall into this category. The rest-about 15%-would not benefit, and there are concerns that FDCT might be slightly less accurate than regular CT in diagnosing these types of strokes. So, we need to test whether One-Stop management is safe and effective for all patients, not just those with treatable blockages. To do this, the GET-FAST trial will compare the One-Stop approach to the standard two-room process. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two strategies. Importantly, this randomization won't affect their actual treatment-everyone will still receive the best care according to current medical guidelines. The main endpoint for the evaluation of the One-Stop approach will be long-term (at 90 days) disability and dependency in daily life as measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). This study will include all patients as they were assigned, regardless of what type of stroke they actually had. This is called an "intention-to-treat" analysis, and it provides the most reliable measure of the overall impact of One-Stop management. Another key aspect of the trial is that any CE-certified imaging system already used in hospitals can be used for the One-Stop process-no specific brand or model is required. This makes the results more applicable to real-world hospital settings. If GET-FAST proves that One-Stop management leads to better patient outcomes, this could transform how stroke care is delivered. More patients could return to independent living, and fewer would require long-term care -leading to major reductions in healthcare costs. For example, even a one-point improvement on a common stroke disability scale (mRS) can triple the savings in lifetime care costs.
NCT06967025
This clinical trial will evaluate whether on-site ischemic postconditioning (IPostC) improves outcomes in acute stroke patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and explore its mechanisms. The investigators aim to answer: (1) Is on-site IPostC effective compared to EVT alone? (2) What molecular markers and cellular pathways does on-site IPostC influence? Participants will be randomized to EVT alone or EVT+IPostC (4 cycles of 2-minute balloon occlusion/reperfusion). The investigators will assess infarct size, functional outcomes, biomarkers (e.g., multi-omics, ELISA, and clinical laboratory parameters), and safety (e.g., mortality, procedure-related complications).
NCT07001852
The DONE SYMPLE Investigator-initiated phase III prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint-controlled clinical trial. This clinical trial is a global clinical study testing whether a procedure called endovascular therapy, which removes blood clots from blocked brain arteries, can safely benefit more stroke patients when used up to 72 hours after symptoms begin. Endovacular Therapy is already proven to improve recovery in patients treated within 6 hours, but only when advanced imaging like Computed Tomography (CT) perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is available to guide treatment. Unfortunately, many hospitals, specially in underserved areas, do not have access to this type of imaging. This trial will investigate whether a basic brain scan called non-contrast CT, which is widely available in hospitals around the world, can be used instead. Special software will automatically analyze the CT scan to help doctors decide if a patient has enough brain tissue left to save with Endovascular Therapy. If this simpler approach works, it could expand access to lifesaving stroke care for more people globally. The study will enroll 500 adult stroke patients, ages 18 to 80, with a large vessel blockage in the brain's anterior circulation, moderate to severe stroke symptoms, and who are between 6 and 72 hours from when they were last known to be well. All participants will undergo CT imaging analyzed by the automated software. If the scan shows a small core of already damaged brain tissue and a larger area of threatened but still viable brain, the patient will qualify. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either standard medical therapy alone or medical therapy plus Endovasculat Therapy which involves inserting a catheter through a blood vessel to reach the brain and using a device to remove the clot. This procedure is performed by trained stroke or neurointerventional specialists. The study is "open-label," meaning patients and doctors know which treatment is given, but the assessment of patient recovery will be done by independent reviewers who do not know the group assignments. The primary goal is to determine if patients who receive Endovascular Therapy have better recovery at 90 days, measured by a scale called the modified Rankin Scale, which assesses how much disability a patient has after a stroke. The trial will also look at safety (especially brain bleeding after treatment), size and growth of brain injury on follow-up scans, recovery of strength and language, and overall quality of life and survival. Imaging will be reviewed centrally by a specialized team, and results will be analyzed to see how well Endovascular Therapy performs using this new patient selection method. The DONE SYMPLE Trial is sponsored by Foundacio Ictus in Barcelona Spain and the University of Iowa is the Central Coordinating Center for the Study. It will take place at up to 20 hospitals worldwide. All patients will be followed closely with exams and imaging at specific time points up to 90 days after treatment. If successful, this trial could change stroke care around the world by proving that Endovascular Therapy can be used safely and effectively even without advanced imaging, using tools available in most hospitals. This could help more stroke patients, especially in rural or resource-limited areas, access treatments that may improve their chances of recovery and reduce long-term disability.
NCT07080567
MASTER is a single-center, patient and investigator-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of Maraviroc, a C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist, against placebo regarding motor function and motor learning skills in the first 3 months after ischemic stroke.
NCT06613828
The goal of this experimental study is to evaluate the efficacy of five educational strategies for recognizing early symptoms of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in the general adult population. The main questions it aims to answer are: \- How effective are the strategies RAPIDO, CORRE, DALE, CAMALEON, and ICTUS 911 in improving the recognition of early CVD symptoms? Researchers will compare these strategies to determine which one leads to the highest increase in symptom recognition. Participants will receive a brief educational session on one of the five strategies and will: * Complete a pre- and post-intervention survey (Stroke Awareness Questionnaire, SAQ). * Receive short training on CVD symptoms and the urgency of contacting emergency services. The primary outcome is the improvement in SAQ scores, and the secondary outcome is the proportion of participants achieving adequate knowledge of CVD symptoms.
NCT06821347
This is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) clinical trial aiming to investigate a possible new treatment to limit damage to the brain caused by a stroke. Strokes that are caused by a clot blocking an artery in the brain ('ischaemic' strokes) starve brain tissue of oxygen and nutrients. Over a short period of time without oxygen, this tissue becomes permanently damaged. The trial aims to investigate the effects of a drug that carries extra oxygen, called NanO2, on the amount of brain tissue damage. By carrying extra oxygen to brain tissue NanO2 may allow the tissue to survive for longer. It might be especially useful to prevent further damage happening while treatments to try and open the blocked blood vessel are given. Treatments may include 'clot-busting' drugs, or procedures to physically open a blocked artery. These treatments are very effective, but take time to successfully open the blockage. The study will involve treating people as early as possible after the stroke, and comparing brain scans before and after treatment. Patients diagnosed with a stroke that has occurred within the past 9 hours will be eligible to participate. The study will involve 8-15 hospitals across the UK. Participation in the study will last approximately 90 days. The majority of the study assessments will be during the first 5 days during inpatient hospital stay. There will be a telephone follow-up at 30 days and 90 days post-discharge.
NCT06801457
The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled normobaric hyperoxia therapy (NBO) beginning in the pre-hospital setting in patients with suspected acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) due to large vessel occlusion presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset.
NCT06727006
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are the standard of care for treating selected patients with acute large-vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). Successful revascularization is strongly correlated with favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, recanalization failure with stent retrieval and contact aspiration has been observed in up to 29% of patients. If primary thrombectomy fails to achieve recanalization, rescue stenting (RS) has proven to be a feasible rescue therapy. Currently, approved evidence-based alternatives for LVOS patients who have failed MT are lacking, but permanent stenting is suggested as a rescue treatment in expert consensus statements. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), typically consisting of clopidogrel and aspirin, is recommended after stent implantation to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis; however, these medications are not suitable in the acute setting, and optimal platelet inhibition strategies remain unclear. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have intravenous administration, a rapid onset of action, and their effects subside within a few hours after discontinuation. For these reasons, an increasing number of studies have investigated their use in conjunction with primary stenting for acute stroke. Currently, there is no evidence supporting the superiority of any particular antithrombotic strategy, so decisions are guided by clinical judgment. An additional challenge for clinicians arises when IVT is combined with stenting. Stroke guidelines recommend starting antiplatelets 24 hours after IVT and the risk associated with antithrombotic therapy within the first 24 hours after IVT remains uncertain. This is multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with LVOS undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and rescue stenting. The aim of this study is to evaluate real-world antithrombotic strategies in emergency stenting, particularly in patients treated with IVT, and to assess the safety of emergent stenting following intravenous thrombolysis.
NCT06315192
The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of the CE-marked wearable system Stroke Alarm to identify the onset of a stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset. This is a multicenter, prospective observational single-arm trial with a registry-based propensity matched control population. A total of 500 patients will be included in the trial. An interim analysis will determine if the stroke onset frequency is sufficient to determine the main outcome. Should the number of stroke events differ from what is expected at interim analysis, study enrollment will continue to increase cohort size. Patients who meet the criteria for participation will, after signing consent, be included and receive the Stroke Alarm bracelets that are used for 3 months. Study data will be collected as baseline at inclusion, at follow-up 3 months after inclusion and by using national Swedish registry data after completion of the study. Patients with elevated stroke risk according assessed by presence of specific criteria associated with elevated risk caused by: 1. recent TIA, OR 2. recent stroke without persisting arm motor deficit, OR 3. atrial fibrillation A control population matched for age, sex, NIHSS score and health care region will be identified in the Swedish national stroke registry, Riksstroke, and used for comparison. The combined efficacy goal is at least 60% sensitivity for Stroke Alarm b of stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset (with a 95% confidence interval above 30%) and a specificity of at least 80% using a clinical stroke diagnosis as gold standard.
NCT06668857
BACKGROUND: A chief complaint of acute vertigo/dizziness is related to about 2.1-7.1% of all emergency department (ED) visits. About 25% of all patients with acute prolonged vertigo meeting diagnostic criteria of AVS (acute vestibular syndrome) suffer from a vertebrobasilar stroke and about 35% of these patients are initially missed. Differentiating dangerous central from more benign peripheral causes of AVS is essential. Subtle oculomotor paradigms such as HINTS (Head-Impulse, Nystagmus, Test-of-Skew) have been shown to detect central causes with high diagnostic accuracy, however, require sufficient training. Thus, identifying other bedside tests that can be reliably performed by frontline providers is essential to reduce misdiagnosis. WORKING HYPOTHESIS: By using additional oculomotor (saccades, pursuit) and pupillomotor parameters at the bedside or quantitatively, the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing peripheral from central AVS causes can be further improved, especially in the setting when expertise for applying more sophisticated algorithms (HINTS(+), STANDING) is lacking. AIM 1: Detecting changes in oculomotor and pupillomotor responses in acutely dizzy patients and characterizing the spectrum of abnormalities in peripheral and central AVS. AIM 2: Comparing different composite oculomotor-/pupillomotor scores to identify those scores with the highest diagnostic accuracy at the bedside and quantitatively. AIM 3: Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of bedside and quantitative oculomotor and pupillomotor testing in AVS- identifying potential limitations of bedside testing. METHODS: To assess oculomotor and pupillomotor responses in patients with peripheral or central AVS and healthy controls (25 participants each) at the bedside and quantitatively by use of a Pioneer research eye tracker (PRET) system and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of individual and composite responses. EXPECTED VALUE OF THE PROJECT: The proposed project will shed more light on the value of different examination techniques in AVS for distinguishing peripheral from central causes. This is achieved by investigating oculomotor and pupillomotor parameters obtained at the bedside and quantitatively in the acute stage and at follow-up. The insights gained will likely have a direct impact on diagnostic accuracy and thus on future strategies how to evaluate acutely dizzy patients in the ED. Eventually, this may reduce the rate of misdiagnosis and may improve patients' outcome.