Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 409 trials
NCT07071935
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a disease that causes weakness of the muscles of the body. The disease can eventually lead to severe breathing problems, which is the most common cause of death from ALS. The treatment for breathing is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). It is a machine that helps a person breathe by pushing air in and out of their lungs through a mask worn over the face. Research has shown that NIV can improve the quality of life and survival of someone with ALS. Unfortunately, NIV is not equally beneficial for everyone. The investigators do not yet know the best time or method for starting NIV in ALS. Europe and Canada allow starting NIV much earlier in ALS than the United States. Current recommendations for starting NIV are based on the opinion of experts rather than large research studies. Medical insurance companies will not cover NIV until significant breathing weakness occurs. After NIV is started, there is no evidence-based guidance on the best way to adjust NIV to benefit patients as much as possible. Some patients have difficulty tolerating NIV, but it is not clear how to identify these individuals ahead of time. The investigators have created a new prediction tool that can identify patients at high risk of breathing problems within the next 6 months. This may help the study team identify who is more likely to benefit from starting NIV early. The investigators have published a paper that shows that NIV helps people with ALS live longer. This paper also showed that patients get more benefit with use NIV for at least 4 hours per day. The investigators published another paper that measured a gas called carbon dioxide (CO2), which goes high if someone's breathing is weakened. This paper showed that patients with ALS may live longer when CO2 levels are lowered using NIV. The investigators also have data suggesting that certain characteristics may predict who is less likely to use NIV at least 4 hours per day. In this study, the investigators will collect pilot data on starting early NIV in individuals with ALS who do not yet meet insurance criteria for covering NIV. The research team will first use their previously published prediction tool to identify patient risk. Then, subjects would be randomized to start early NIV or to usual care. The usual care group would eventually start NIV as would occur if the participants were not in the study. The purpose of this study is to collect data to help the investigators plan a larger randomized clinical trial. This study has 4 objectives. First, the project aims to identify individuals who would benefit from earlier NIV. The research team will use the original prediction tool to identify risk of severe breathing problems within the next 6 months. Second, the project aims to show that it is feasible to start NIV early. Third, the project aims to gather data on the effect of randomization on symptoms, CO2 levels, and outcomes. Fourth, the project aims to identify traits that may make someone less likely to use NIV.
NCT07380607
This observational study examined double triggering asynchrony in28ICU patients on mechanical ventilation. Researchers collected data on patient characteristics, health conditions, and outcomes to understand how this problem affects critically ill patients. Findings may help improve ventilator care in intensive care units.
NCT06213168
De novo hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) is one of the main causes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. In de novo hARF, intubation is associated with a dramatic increase in mortality rate. Compared to standard oxygen, the use of high-flow oxygen nasal cannula (HFNC) might be beneficial to prevent intubation and mortality, although the results of trials and meta-analyses are conflicting. Even with HFNC, the intubation rate remains high. This is the reason why adjunctive therapies, administered in addition to HFNC are needed. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is one of these adjunctive therapies. CPAP provides high level of positive end-expiratory pressure that ensures lung recruitment, but without adding inspiratory pressure support, which prevents ventilator induced lung injury. In addition, as opposed to pressure support, CPAP is well tolerated during long periods of time. Therefore, applying CPAP in addition to HFNC may reduce intubation rate and in turn mortality rate. The present trial will evaluate the impact on mortality of a strategy including continuous positive airway pressure plus high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy alone in patients with de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07518862
High-flow nasal cannula is a type of non-invasive respiratory support that helps patients breathe more comfortably. Because the flow is high, it can deliver more oxygen to the lungs and make breathing easier by reducing the effort needed to breathe. However, the best strategy to determine the best oxygen flow rate remains uncertain. Reducing flow rates prematurely can increase work of breathing and prolong ICU stay, while unnecessary prolongation can increase costs. Currently, evidence to guide titration is limited. Heart rate variability is the natural variation in the time between each heartbeat. Heart rate variability reflects the level of autonomic nervous system activity in response to stress. The autonomic nervous system is the part of the nervous system that automatically controls how heart rate speeds up and slows down. When heart rate variability is higher, it indicates that the system is able to adjust to changes in the body, including stress. However, when heart rate variability is low, it indicates that the system is constrained and in a state of stress. The VARIATION study is designed to characterize how heart rate variability goal of this observational study is to learn whether heart rate variability can serve as a marker of the appropriateness of high flow nasal cannula flow support during flow titration in patients with respiratory failure. The main question it aims to answer is: Does heart rate variability change before other conventional respiratory signs when there are changes in respiratory function due to inadequate flow rate? Participants already on high flow nasal cannula as part of their regular medical care will: 1. Undergo a stepwise decrease in high flow nasal cannula flow rate. 2. Be recorded continuously with electrocardiogram and electrical impedance tomography.
NCT07223762
The Hyperangulated versus Standard Geometry Laryngoscope Blade (ANGLE) Trial is a multi-center, non-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of use of a hyperangulated video laryngoscope blade versus use of a standard geometry video laryngoscope blade. Critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in participating EDs and ICUs who meet eligibility criteria will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either intubation using a hyperangulated video laryngoscope blade or a standard geometry video laryngoscope blade. The primary outcome is the incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome is incidence of hypoxemia during the interval between induction and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation.
NCT07451977
The aim of this multicenter crossover trial is to describe the effect of adding a therapeutic dose of exertional oxygen therapy, in terms of exercise performance, gas exchange, heart rate, symptoms perception and subjective easiness of performance, in a cohort of subjects hospitalized in specialized pulmonary rehabilitation centers with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure and/or exertional hypoxemia due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or interstitial lung disease. Researchers will compare the walking performance during 6-minute walk test performed with the liters of oxygen administered as prescribed at rest (for patients with chronic respiratory failure) or in room air (for patients with exertional hypoxemia only), to the performance during a 6-minute walk test performed with the double the flow rate prescribed at rest, or with 2 L/min for patients with exertional hypoxemia only. The two tests will be performed in random order, at least 3 hours apart and no later than 24 hours apart from each other. The main outcome will be the difference between the distance walked in the two 6-minute walk test in the two conditions. Furthermore, will be also collected and compared: the oxygen saturation and heart rate every minute, the initial and final dyspnea and fatigue, as assessed by Borg scale, and the easiness of performance through a dedicated questionnaire. The estimated sample size will be 114 patients. This study will provide some basis for a more accurate prescription of exercise-related oxygen therapy, offering insights into the phenotype of patients who may derive the greatest benefit from this intervention. It will also stimulate discussion regarding the optimal timing and dosing of oxygen administration during exertion in patients with respiratory failure.
NCT05277896
Among critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, one in five experience hypotension, cardiac arrest, or death. The sedatives used to rapidly induce anesthesia for emergency tracheal intubation have been hypothesized to effect cardiovascular complications and patient outcomes, but the optimal sedative medication for intubation of critically ill adults remains unknown. Ketamine and etomidate are the two most commonly used sedatives during intubation of critically ill adults. Data from a randomized clinical trial are urgently needed to determine the effect of ketamine versus etomidate on cardiovascular complications and clinical outcomes of emergency tracheal intubation.
NCT06189924
Mechanically ventilated intensive care patients will be sampled for a small amount of exhaled breath condensate from the ventilator circuit and for venous blood. Proteomic analysis of the exhaled breath condensate will be performed using mass spectrometry and in the blood sample, corresponding changes in the DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites will be studied. Resulting profiles will be correlated with routinely monitored parameters in order to identify patterns corresponding to various pathologies in order to enable their early detection.
NCT06521489
High-flow oxygen therapy has been applied after extubation in cardiac surgery patients with a well-known successful efficacy. The current authors plan to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled study of the Asymmetrical device Nasal Cannula High Flow Oxygenation (HFNCO) application on high flow (60L/min) with 60% fiO2 administration versus Conventional device Nasal Cannula High Flow Oxygenation (HFNCO) application on high flow (60L/min) with 60% fiO2 administration and versus Conventional oxygen treatment (Venturi mask) after extubation of patients undergoing elective or non-elective cardiac surgery.
NCT05078034
This Randomized Control Trial will directly compare helmet non-invasive ventilation (NIV) combined with high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) versus HFNO alone in patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (AHRF).
NCT07452406
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a type of oxygen therapy commonly used in adults with breathing problems. While HFNC can help patients avoid breathing tubes and improve oxygen levels, there is no standard method for deciding how and when to reduce and stop this therapy once a patient improves. In many hospitals, these decisions vary from clinician to clinician. This study will compare usual care with a standardized step-by-step plan for reducing HFNC support. Eight hospitals will participate and will switch from usual care to the standardized plan at different time points during the study. The main goal is to determine whether the standardized weaning plan increases the number of patients who can successfully stop HFNC within 5 days. The study will also evaluate how long patients remain on HFNC, whether they need additional breathing support, and how long they stay in the hospital. The results may help develop clearer guidance for safely and efficiently stopping HFNC therapy.
NCT05563779
Landmark trials in critical care have demonstrated that, among critically ill adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, the use of low tidal volumes and low airway pressures prevents lung injury and improves patient outcomes. Limited evidence, however, informs the best method of mechanical ventilation to achieve these targets. To provide mechanical ventilation, clinicians must choose between modes of ventilation that directly control tidal volumes ("volume control"), modes that directly control the inspiratory airway pressure ("pressure control"), and modes that are hybrids ("adaptive pressure control"). Whether the choice of the mode used to target low tidal volumes and low inspiratory plateau pressures affects clinical outcomes for critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation is unknown. All three modes of mechanical ventilation are commonly used in clinical practice. A large, multicenter randomized trial comparing available modes of mechanical ventilation is needed to understand the effect of each mode on clinical outcomes. The investigators propose a 9-month cluster-randomized cluster-crossover pilot trial evaluating the feasibility of comparing three modes (volume control, pressure control, and adaptive pressure control) for mechanically ventilated ICU patients with regard to the outcome of days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation.
NCT06343545
To evaluate, through a randomized clinical trial in groups/clusters (stepped wedge), the impact of specific bundles for disability prevention and early rehabilitation, focused on 3 domains (ICU, ward and post-discharge), on health-related quality of life and other long- and short-term outcomes, 90 days after hospital discharge, in critically ill patients affected by hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.
NCT07423338
Acute respiratory failure is a common, life-threatening condition where the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the body. Many patients are treated with non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) such as high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). However, up to half of patients receiving NRS still deteriorate and require intubation and invasive ventilation, which is linked to longer hospital stays, more complications, and slower recovery. A major challenge in caring for these patients is that clinicians currently cannot directly see how well the breathing muscles (especially the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscles) and the lungs are working while the patient is using NRS. Existing bedside measures, such as respiratory rate or oxygen levels, only show part of the picture. They do not indicate how hard the patient is working to breathe or whether their respiratory muscles are becoming fatigued. This lack of information may delay important decisions about adjusting NRS settings or switching to other treatments. This study aims to find out whether two advanced but non-invasive, radiation-free bedside monitoring tools can be used effectively in routine care: 1. Ultrasound, which can measure breathing muscle thickness, movement, and lung aeration 2. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), which uses a soft belt of small electrodes around the chest to measure changes in air and blood flow within different regions of the lungs in real time These tools have shown promise in earlier research, and interviews with patients and clinicians suggest they are comfortable, well-tolerated, and potentially useful. However, they have not yet been evaluated together in a real-world hospital environment where many acute respiratory failure patients are cared for outside the ICU. What the study will involve: Up to 100 adults with acute respiratory failure requiring any type of non invasive respiratory support will be recruited with the goal of obtaining complete data from at least 50 patients. Each participant will undergo ultrasound and EIT assessments up to seven times during the first 72 hours after starting NRS, plus an additional measurement if they improve enough to stop NRS or if they deteriorate and require intubation. These assessments take place at the bedside, require brief exposure of the upper chest, and last approximately 15-45 minutes. Routine clinical data-such as heart rate, oxygen levels, and breathing measures-will also be recorded. In parallel, clinical staff caring for these patients will complete a short Healthcare System Usability Scale questionnaire to rate how useful, understandable, and practical they find the information generated by ultrasound and EIT. Some staff may also take part in optional interviews to explore usability in more depth. What the study is trying to learn: The primary aim is to determine the usability of these monitoring methods meaning understanding if they are practical, easy to use, and helpful for clinicians making decisions about NRS treatment. Secondary aims include understanding: * how the respiratory muscles and lungs change over time during NRS * whether these changes are linked to treatment settings (e.g., flow rate, pressure support) * whether certain patterns are associated with treatment success or failure (intubation or death) * whether these tools could help identify patients at risk of deterioration earlier Risks and benefits: Both ultrasound and EIT are widely used, safe, and non-invasive. They involve no radiation, needles, or harmful exposure. Minor temporary discomfort from the gel or belt placement is possible. Participation will not change any clinical treatments. Although patients may not directly benefit, the study may help future patients by improving understanding of breathing muscle function and supporting more personalised respiratory care. By contributing to this research, patients and clinicians will help determine whether advanced monitoring can be realistically implemented in busy hospital settings and whether it could lay the groundwork for future trials aimed at improving outcomes for people with acute respiratory failure.
NCT07411976
This prospective multicenter observational study aims to describe resuscitation room activity in France and to compare critical care admission within 24 hours between patients directly admitted to the resuscitation room and those admitted secondarily after initial emergency department management. Adult patients admitted to the resuscitation room over a 72-hour period in participating centers will be included. Data collection includes patient characteristics, triage severity, physiological parameters, critical interventions, and outcomes at 24 hours.
NCT07067502
subjects on mechanical ventilator who are about to be extubated to Non invasive ventilation because the physician thinks they are high risk for failure will be approached and consented for our study. Once randomized they will either be on the standard of care Non invasive arm or the intervention arm which would mean they are placed on the Biphasic cuirass ventilation.
NCT07186933
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of perioperative mechanical ventilation (MV), specifically Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) and MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP), in relation to the appearance of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult patients who are operated and have higher risk of PPCs. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is MV with lower ΔP better than conventional PMV in preventing PPCs in patients with higher risk for PPCs? * Does MV with lower ΔP decrease hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) need and mortality? * Does MV with lower ΔP suit better than PMV to lung characteristics and needs intraoperatively? Researchers will compare MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP) to Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) to see if any of this is more protective than the other concerning PPCs. All participants will receive perioperative MV. Half of them will receive conventional Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV). This will include well known generally protective settings for mechanical ventilation of patients, concerning volumes, pressures, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. The rest of participants will be ventilated with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP). This will be similar to PMV in the chosen volumes, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. However, the pressure inside lung at the end of expiration, eg Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), will be not be preset for every patient. Initially, the investigators will perform a maneuver that will quantify each individual's lung characteristics and mechanics. According to this, the investigators will find the exact PEEP that seems to suit each patients lungs most, and use this perioperatively, trying to provide lungs the best conditions every time. After the completion of the operation, all the patients will be screened for PPCs, via arterial blood testing and chest X ray, and the results will be statistically analyzed trying to find if any of the forementioned strategies of mechanical ventilation surpasses the other concerning PPCs appearance. PPCs include atelectasis, respiratory failure, bronchospasm, pleural effusion, pneumonia, aspiration and pneumothorax. Furthermore hospital stay, ICU need and mortality will be noted. Finally, measurements of perioperative lung pressures, volumes and derived variables will be noted and compared statistically as well.
NCT07396701
1. Background Severe pneumonia with respiratory failure carries a high mortality rate. Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits for interventions such as Trendelenburg Position and certain herbal formulations used within an integrative treatment framework. However, robust evidence from large-scale trials is lacking. This study utilizes an innovative adaptive platform trial design embedded within a continuous cohort to efficiently evaluate the efficacy and safety of these adjunctive interventions combined with standard care, with the inherent flexibility to incorporate future promising therapies. 2. Objectives Primary Objective: To evaluate whether adjunctive treatment with either Trendelenburg Position or Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formulation, compared to standard care alone, reduces all-cause mortality at 28 days in patients with severe pneumonia and respiratory failure. Secondary Objectives: To assess the effects on clinical outcomes including incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score trajectory, and oxygenation. To evaluate the safety profile of the interventions. 3. Study Design CARP-RF is a Chinese adaptive, randomised trial enrolling patients with pneumonia and respiratory failure. A continuously enrolled master cohort of eligible patients will be established. Within this cohort, eligible consenting participants will be centrally randomized in an unbalanced ratio of (1.5:1:1) to one of three parallel groups. 4. Participant Population Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU, diagnosed with severe pneumonia per IDSA/ATS criteria (requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or meeting other major/minor criteria), under invasive mechanical ventilation and sedation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ≤ -1). Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy, terminal illness, significant pulmonary fibrosis or lung cancer, known/suspected intracranial hypertension, increased intraocular pressure or recent eye surgery, and severe refractory hemodynamic instability. 5. Interventions All participants receive guideline-directed standard care for severe pneumonia. Control Group: Standard care only. Intervention Group 1: Standard care plus Trendelenburg Position at -10° for ≥12 hours daily until sedation is discontinued and consciousness is recovered (RASS 0). Intervention Group 2 (TCM): Standard care plus a complementary TCM strategy prescribed by a licensed TCM practitioner. This includes the use of a tailored herbal formulation (Monarch:Trichosanthes 60g, Rhubarb 15g; Minister: Gypsum 30g, Bitter Apricot Seed 10g, Descurainia Seed 30g, Verbena 60g; Assistant: Glehnia 30g, Adenophora 30g, Astragalus 30g, Ophiopogon 15g, Schisandra 6g; Guide: Licorice 10g). One dose twice daily via oral/enteral route for 7 days. 6. Outcome Measures Primary Outcome: All-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization. Key Secondary Outcomes: VAP incidence; Ventilator-free days at 28 days; duration of invasive mechanical ventilation; ICU and hospital length of stay; change in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio; change in SOFA score. 7. Sample Size Approximately 1500 participants will be enrolled from multiple tertiary hospitals in China, accounting for consent rates, eligibility within the cohort, and a 5% attrition rate. The sample provides 80% power (alpha=0.05, two-sided) to detect an absolute mortality reduction from 30% to 20%. 8. Randomization, Blinding, and Consent Randomization is performed centrally via an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS), stratified by site and baseline SOFA score. The trial is open-label for caregivers and participants. Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to treatment allocation. A two-stage consent process is used: broad consent for cohort data collection, followed by specific consent for the randomized intervention only for those allocated to an intervention group. 9. Data and Safety Monitoring An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will periodically review unblinded safety and efficacy data. Serious adverse events will be monitored and reported according to regulatory requirements. The DSMB may recommend protocol modifications, including early stopping for efficacy/futility or incorporation of new interventions into the adaptive platform. 10. Statistical Analysis The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Given the pragmatic design, a Compiler Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis will supplement the primary analysis to estimate the effect among participants who adhere to the protocol. Pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted. 11. Ethical Considerations The protocol will be approved by the Institutional Review Board of the leading center and all participating sites. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
NCT07371026
THE EFFECT OF USİNG DİSTRACTOR CARDS AND THERMOCHROMİC CARDS ON PAİN, FEAR, ANXİETY AND PROCEDURE TİME İN CHİLDREN RECEİVİNG INHALER THERAPY. Respiratory illnesses in children are a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. Organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that millions of children are hospitalized each year due to respiratory illnesses (He, Wang, \& Zhang, 2025). A large proportion of these illnesses are caused by viral agents, and pathogens such as Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), influenza, and rhinoviruses pose serious health threats to young children (Chen, Zhang, \& Li, 2024). This study will be one of the rare studies in pediatric nursing that examines the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions that can be applied during inhaler therapy in young age groups. The findings will contribute to nurses developing effective methods to reduce the negative emotions experienced by children during treatment. Furthermore, the first-ever use of thermochromic cards in this context in pediatric nursing will provide an innovative perspective on pediatric nursing practices. H0: Thermochromic cards and distraction cards used during inhaler therapy have no effect on pain, fear, anxiety levels, or processing time. Thermochromic cards used during inhaler therapy: H1: reduce the child's pain. H2: reduce the child's fear. H3: reduce the child's anxiety level. H4: shorten the child's processing time. Distraction cards used during inhaler therapy: H5: reduce the child's pain. H6: reduce the child's fear. H7: reduce the child's anxiety level. H8: shorten the child's processing time.
NCT05686850
In intensive care units (ICUs), around 20% of patients experience respiratory failure after planned extubation. Nearly 40-50% of them eventually require reintubation with subsequently high mortality rates reaching 30-40%. NIV used as rescue therapy to treat post-extubation respiratory failure could increase the risk of death. However, NIV may avoid reintubation in a number of cases, and recent large-scale clinical trials on extubation have shown that around 40 to 50% of patients with post-extubation respiratory failure are actually treated with NIV. Whereas high-flow nasal oxygen has never been specifically studied for management of post-extubation respiratory failure, this respiratory support could also in this setting constitute an alternative to standard oxygen or NIV. Given the best noninvasive respiratory support strategy in patients with post-extubation respiratory failure remains unknown, we have decided to assess whether NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen as compared to high-flow nasal oxygen alone may decrease mortality of patients in ICUs with post-extubation respiratory failure.