Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-9 of 9 trials
NCT06064916
This is a non-interventional, prospective, observational study of the outcomes for post myopic refractive surgery patients following successful, uncomplicated cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of the Vivity IOL (DAT\*\*\*/CCWET\*). Patients will be assessed for monocular and binocular distance, intermediate, and near vision.
NCT04692012
The residual hypermetropic refraction on pseudophakic(Trifocal IOL) patients is difficult to treat surgically. In addition, there are not many suitable options to offer such patients presenting with this condition. Two current common surgeries to treat residual hyperopic refraction are refractive lens exchange (RLE) and excimer laser ablation (LASIK or PRK). Laser procedures: Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK); Laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); Risks of LASIK include abnormalities of the corneal flap, epithelial ingrowth, corneal ectasia, refractive surprises, irregular astigmatism, decentration, visual aberrations, a loss of BCVA, infectious keratitis, symptoms, and diffuse lamellar keratitis. Refractive lens exchange (RLE); The risks of RLE are similar to those of cataract surgery and include endophthalmitis, a loss of accommodation, vitreous loss with posterior capsular rupture, and retinal detachment. The method used at the EYE Hospital Pristina using fresh lenticule implantation by ReLex-SMILE is safe and effective method, since there is no flap this prevents invasive damage to the anterior surface of the cornea contrary to the LASIK where flap is present posing risk for epithelial ingrowth. Before SMILE,YAG-laser capsulotomy should be performed on all patients, regardless of posterior capsule ossification, in pseudophakic patients with residual refraction. When the YAG-laser is applied after the SMILE,there will be a diopter change.
NCT04242875
Angle Kappa is considered a potential factor in explaining suboptimal outcomes with intraocular lenses (IOLs), particularly multifocal IOLs. Some evidence suggests this is not the case. This study was designed to investigate correlations between angle kappa and post-surgical outcomes with a trifocal IOL.
NCT01310127
This is a single-center, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group, and active-comparator controlled study investigating the clinical outcomes for visual acuity and macular thickness after treatment with Bromday (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.09% QD or Nevanac (nepafenac ophthalmic suspension) 0.1% TID in subjects who have undergone cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
NCT04059289
To compare (low contrast) visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) - both at intermediate distances under nighttime driving conditions in a driving simulator between patients with bilateral EYHANCE IOLs OR bilateral conventional monofocal IOLs. Visual function testing in the driving simulator will be assessed without AND with (static) glare. Additionally: Assessment of individual response times, scanpath characteristics, evaluation of test retest reliability and self-evaluation of (intermediate) vision and visual impairment related to glare.
NCT02668523
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay implanted in bilateral pseudophakes with presbyopia for improvement of near and intermediate vision.
NCT01193504
The purpose of this study is to determine if Lotemax eye drops are at least as effective as Pred Forte eye drops, which are the standard of care after cataract surgery.
NCT00428363
Purpose: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) inhibiting effect of the sharp posterior optic edge design of the Clariflex silicone intraocular lens (IOL) with that of the double-round edge design of the SI40 (Phacoflex) silicone IOL over a period of 3 years. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Methods: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes) were included in this randomized, prospective, bilateral, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intra-individual comparison. Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received an SI40 IOL (anterior and posterior round optic edges) in one eye and a Clariflex IOL with OptiEdge (round anterior and sharp posterior optic edge) in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were at one week, one month, six months, one, two, and three years. Digital retroillumination images were taken of each eye. The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit-lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (AQUA) one, two, and three years after surgery.
NCT00347243
Purpose:To compare visual performance, total and high order wavefront aberrations (coma, spherical aberration and other terms) and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with one monofocal aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) and two spherical IOLs (SofPort AO, Soflex,AcrySof®IQ (40 eyes), AcrySof®Natural and AMO®Sensar)