Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-10 of 10 trials
NCT06703814
The investigators want to investigate in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (a minimally invasive procedure) how applicable flow-controlled ventilation is, and whether it might also be safer than the current ventilation techniques, as well as its impact on potentially reducing the risk of lung-specific complications. Flow-controlled ventilation has already been tested in several studies on animals and humans and has proven to be a safe form of ventilation for patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. When patients undergo major surgery, general anesthesia is required and, as a result, mechanical ventilation of the lungs. Especially in long and complex surgeries, ventilation can become more difficult or lead to complications postoperatively. These patients may then experience shortness of breath, coughing, or require medication to improve lung function. In some cases, reintubation or additional mechanical ventilation may be necessary for support. Previous human studies have shown that flow-controlled ventilation is less stressful and, therefore, potentially safer for the lungs compared to traditional ventilation techniques, and that less supplemental oxygen is required. This effect and the safety of flow-controlled ventilation have been demonstrated in several studies. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aim to explore whether flow-controlled ventilation is potentially safer and easier to apply than traditional ventilation techniques and whether it can reduce the risk of lung-specific complications following robot-assisted surgeries, thereby improving the recovery process postoperatively.
NCT07461285
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) ranges from 5% to 33%. PPCs significantly prolong hospital stay, increase the economic burden, and are associated with postoperative mortality at 30 days and 1 year. The occurrence of PPCs is associated with multiple perioperative factors. A multimodal approach may provide better prevention against PPCs. We hypothesize that perioperative prophylactic positive pressure ventilation can reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery.
NCT07186920
Brief summary The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of perioperative mechanical ventilation (MV), specifically Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) and MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP), in relation to the appearance of postoperative lung closing, eg atelectasis, in adult patients who are operated. Atelectasis will be evaluated via lung ultrasound. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is MV with lower ΔP better than conventional PMV in keeping lungs more open perioperatively and immediately postoperatively? * Does MV with lower ΔP decrease hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) need and mortality? Researchers will use lung ultrasound to compare MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP) to Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) to see if any of this is more protective than the other concerning lung atelectasis. All participants will receive perioperative MV. Half of them will receive conventional Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV). This will include well known generally protective settings for mechanical ventilation of patients, concerning volumes, pressures, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. The rest of participants will be ventilated with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP). This will be similar to PMV in the chosen volumes, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. However, the pressure inside lung at the end of expiration, eg Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), will be not be preset for every patient. Initially, we will perform a maneuver that will quantify each individual's lung characteristics and mechanics. According to this, we will find the exact PEEP that seems to suit each patients lungs most, and use this perioperatively, trying to provide lungs the best conditions every time. After the completion of the operation, all the patients will be screened for atelectasis, via lung ultrasound, using a well established protocol for the quantification of atelectasis. The results will be statistically analyzed trying to find if any of the forementioned strategies of mechanical ventilation surpasses the other concerning atelectasis appearance. Furthermore efficiency of lung oxygen absorption, hospital stay, ICU need and mortality will be noted.
NCT07394816
This prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether the use of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients will be observed in two groups based on routine clinical practice: those who receive an ultrasound-guided fascial plane block for postoperative analgesia and those managed with other standard analgesic methods. The choice of analgesic technique will be determined by the responsible anesthesia team and not influenced by the study. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurring within the first 7 days after surgery will be recorded using reopening the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) criteria. Secondary outcomes will include unplanned intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. No additional procedures or interventions will be performed for research purposes.
NCT06609616
Background: Lung problems develop in up to 20% of people after they have surgery. While under general anesthesia, people breathe slower and draw in less air. They may have difficulty returning to normal deep breathing as they recover. Some may develop life-threatening complications. An approved device called an incentive spirometer is used to help measure and improve a person's breathing after surgery. Researchers want to find out if a motion sensor placed on the chest can also measure the volume of air a person inhales as they breathe. Objective: To determine if a motion sensor on the chest can measure the volume of air a person breathes. Eligibility: Healthy adults aged 18 years and older. Design: * Participants will have one clinic visit. The visit will last 10 to 30 minutes. * They will fill out a form with their age, sex, height, and weight. * A small, plastic motion sensor will be taped to their chest on one or both sides. * Participants will breathe through a tube attached to an incentive spirometer. They will take 18 breaths of different volumes, both deep and shallow. * Researchers will use the data collected from the motion sensors to measure how the chest moves at different levels of breathing. The motion sensor data will be used to create a software program that converts chest wall motion to the volume of air inhaled for a given breath in real time.
NCT07359885
Lung cancer is a common disease, and its treatment is lobectomy or pulmonary segmentectomy. In France, approximately 8,000 patients undergo this procedure each year, but it remains associated with significant Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPC). This surgical trauma triggers a multicellular and orchestrated immune response, necessary for defense against pathogens, as well as for inflammatory resolution and wound healing. Preoperative single-cell analysis of the patient's immune system is therefore a promising strategy for identifying biomarkers of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Brice Gaudilliere's laboratory at Stanford University, in collaboration with the Paris-based startup Surge, has developed and patented a multivariate model integrating mass cytometry data, proteomic analyses, and clinical data collected before surgery to accurately predict surgical site complications after major abdominal surgery. However, no study has yet explored the identification of inflammatory biomarkers predictive of PPC after thoracic surgery.
NCT07258875
This study aims to investigate the effect of a VExUS ultrasound guided protocol of perioperative fluid management within a goal-directed therapy framework, on postoperative respiratory complications, and the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
NCT07207772
This study is a prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery will be selected and randomly assigned to either the EIT-guided individualized PEEP group (Group P-eit) or the control group (Group P-8). Group P will be ventilated using the PEEP value determined by EIT, while Group C will be ventilated with a fixed PEEP value of 8 cmH2O.The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 72 hours after surgery.
NCT07170514
The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the pulmonary protective effects of two different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrating methods in patients with non-injured lungs undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Despite dynamic pulmonary compliance (Cdyn) guided lung protective ventilation has several proven advantages, the investigators hypothesize that optimizing intraoperative mechanical ventilation using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) may further improve patient outcomes, enhance postoperative recovery, shorten in-hospital stay and reduce healthcare related costs. The main questions aim to answer are: * May EIT-guided PEEP titration reduce the mechanical power of ventilation and improve oxygenation more significantly than the Cdyn-guided method? * What effect might a decrease in mechanical power of ventilation have on postoperative pulmonary complications? Participants will: * Receive an EIT-guided or a Cdyn-guided PEEP titration procedure during laparoscopic gynecological surgery. * Be assessed for mechanical power of ventilation, oxygenation, atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications during and 2 days after surgery. * Be followed-up for mortality until the 28th postoperative day.
NCT06662799
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common in patients after major abdominal surgery. It has been shown that 5-40% of patients occur PPCs after major surgery, and the mid to high PPC rate is observed after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. PPCs are associated with poor clinical outcomes including prolonged hospital length of stay and increased morbidity and mortality. Mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia can lead to a redistribution of ventilation, increase the aereation in the ventral parts of the lung, whereas reduce ventilation in the dorsal parts of the lung compared with spontaneous breathing (SB) in the awake state in supine position. The reduction of ventilation of dorsal lung regions indicates the presence of dorsal atelectasis during mechanical ventilation after general anesthesia, which may be associated with PPCs. However, there is still no evidence to reveal the association between the reduction of dorsal ventilation and PPCs. Recently, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), which allows visualization of lung ventilation in real time, and assessment of regional lung ventilation. It is feasible to assess the change of ventral/dorsal lung ventilation during the surgery using EIT. To date, no study has investigated whether the change of ventral/dorsal lung ventilation revealed by EIT could be associated with PPCs. So, this prospective observational study aims to clarify whether patients developing postoperative pulmonary complications had higher reduction of dorsal lung ventilation during operation after general anesthesia as compared to patients not developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Ratio of dorsal ventilation during spontaneous respiration (T0) in the awake state as a reference, the proportion of dorsal ventilation after anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation (T1), body position change and capnoperitoneum (T2), and at the end of surgery (T3) were analyzed. Thereafter, evaluating the change of dorsal ventilation in patients with PPCs and without PPCs at different time points. According to the method of sample size calculation published by Scaramuzzo G et al. (Anesthesiology. 2024 Oct 1;141(4):693-706.). A minimum sample size required for this study was calculated as following: using the difference of reduction of dorsal ventilation at the end of surgery between the patients with PPCs and non-PPCs as the primary outcome. Considering the data of our preliminary experiment showed that a reduction of dorsal lung ventilation at the end of surgery is 12 ± 6% and hypothesizing 30% of patients experiencing postoperative pulmonary complications and a relative clinically relevant increase in reduction of dorsal lung ventilation of 40% in those with postoperative pulmonary complications, we found that 83 patients were sufficient to evaluate differences between groups (effect size 0.8) with a power of 0.90 and an α error of 0.05. Considering a dropout of 10%, we found a minimum sample size of 92 patients.