Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 132 trials
NCT07670338
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the Xuanyin Ning Formula combined with intrapleural injection of bevacizumab via chest tube drainage is effective in treating malignant pleural effusion. It will also evaluate the safety of this combination therapy. The main questions it aims to answer include: Does the Xuanyin Ning Formula combined with intrapleural injection of bevacizumab via chest tube drainage improve the objective response rate (ORR) of pleural effusion in patients with malignant pleural effusion? Does this combination therapy affect the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), degree of dyspnea, quality of life, and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) pattern/syndrome evaluation in patients with malignant pleural effusion? Participants will: Receive intrapleural injection of bevacizumab via chest tube drainage, and take either Xuanyin Ning Formula or placebo granules daily for 8 weeks. Undergo ultrasound assessment of pleural effusion at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the first intrapleural injection during closed chest drainage, followed by ultrasound assessments every 3 months (±7 days) until pleural effusion progression.
NCT07649369
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural JMKX000197 compared with intrapleural cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural effusion.
NCT07615894
This is a prospective, single-center, interventional, phase I, dose-escalation, single-arm study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of intrapleural/intraperitoneal infusion of WSK-IM02 in patients with advanced solid tumors complicated by malignant pleural or peritoneal effusions who have failed standard of care.
NCT04322136
The purpose of this study is to determine if an indwelling catheter is more effective than surgical pleurodosis in treating malignant pleural effusion. Who is it for? You may be eligible for this study if you are an adult who is suffering from symptomatic proven pleural malignancy or an otherwise unexplained pleural effusion. Study details Consenting participants will be randomised to one of two treatment arms: * Arm 1: Indwelling pleural catheter. A long term catheter is inserted under the skin in order to allow ongoing drainage of the pleural fluid. Participants will then be instructed to undergo a daily drainage regimen for 14 days at home. * Arm 2: Surgical pleurodesis. Participants under a key-hole surgery to remove fluid and facilitate lung re-expansion. Participants will then be followed up at discharge, 14 days, monthly for 6 months and then every 3 months up to one year post-procedure. These visits will include completion of Quality of Life questionnaires, a chest xray, an ultrasound (if thought necessary) and if you are at the lead site (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital) a review of your Actigraphy logs up to 6 months after discharge. It is hoped this research will help to provide effective symptom control with minimal intervention for those with malignant pleural effusion.
NCT00761618
The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if draining the IPC every day is better at than draining it 3 times a week.
NCT05461430
The primary objective of this study, sponsored by Travera Inc. in Massachusetts, is to validate whether the mass response biomarker has potential to predict response of patients to specific therapies or therapeutic combinations using isolated tumor cells from various specimen formats including malignant fluids such as pleural effusions and ascites, core needle biopsies, fine needle aspirates, or resections.
NCT07513909
Pleural effusion is a condition where excess fluid builds up in the space between the lungs and the chest wall. To properly treat this condition, doctors must determine if the fluid is a "transudate" (usually resulting from systemic conditions like heart failure or liver disease) or an "exudate" (often resulting from local issues like infections, inflammation, or cancer). The standard method to classify this fluid involves inserting a needle into the chest to draw out a sample for laboratory testing, a procedure known as thoracentesis. While laboratory fluid analysis is highly accurate, the needle procedure carries some inherent procedural risks. This observational study aims to evaluate whether non-invasive imaging tests, specifically chest ultrasound, can accurately determine if the fluid is a transudate or an exudate. Researchers will enroll adult patients presenting with pleural effusion at Assiut University Hospital. As part of their diagnostic workup, participants will undergo a chest ultrasound and a standard diagnostic thoracentesis (fluid draw) within 24 to 48 hours of each other. The study will then evaluate the features seen on the ultrasound against the laboratory fluid analysis (the current gold standard) to see how well the non-invasive imaging performs in identifying the specific type of pleural effusion.
NCT02122185
This randomized phase II trial studies how well metformin hydrochloride and combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with stage III-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carboplatin, paclitaxel and docetaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Metformin hydrochloride may help carboplatin, paclitaxel and docetaxel work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drugs. Studying samples of blood and tissue in the laboratory from patients receiving metformin hydrochloride may help doctors learn more about the effects of metformin hydrochloride on cells. It may also help doctors understand how well patients respond to treatment. Giving metformin hydrochloride together with combination chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells.
NCT06436807
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the performance of the drainova® ArgentiC Catheter in clinical routine, which is used to treat fluid accumulations in hollow body structures. The device is already on the market and participants receive the catheter as part of their regular treatment. The main questions of this study are: * Does the device function as intended? * Are there any other safety risks that have not been identified? * Does it lower the symptoms of the patients as intended? Doctors and patients will answer questions regarding the improvement of the patients´ symptoms and if there were any problems with the catheter.
NCT07443020
This research study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel immunotherapy, Fast TIL, an Adoptive Cellular Therapeutic (ACT), to fight cancer that has spread to the pleura or pleural mesothelioma. The ACT product is created at AHN West Penn using the participant's pleural infiltrating T-cells (PIT). It is administered through a pleural catheter along with the drug Interleukin-2 (IL-2). Based on previous research it is believed that it may help fight the tumor and relieve symptoms. As a participant, their pleural fluid will be collected and the PIT cells will be isolated and expanded in the lab to create the ACT product. Before receiving the ACT product through their pleural catheter, they will undergo outpatient lymphodepleting chemotherapy. LDC is a standard procedure for many approved immunotherapy treatments Following the infusion, they'll receive IL-2 through the catheter for two days to stimulate the expanded PIT cells. The active treatment phase lasts about three weeks, with follow-up visits over five years at AHN West Penn Hospital, potentially requiring a hospital stay of up to six days. Blood samples will be taken to monitor their response. As this is a first-in-human study, treatment carries an unknown risk up to and including death from toxicity. However, the risks of similar immunotherapy treatments are well documented.
NCT07419620
Brief Summary The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether an initial diagnostic approach using ultrasound elastography-guided pleural biopsy (UEPB) is non-inferior to immediate medical thoracoscopic pleural biopsy in terms of diagnostic yield for obtaining a definitive histopathological diagnosis in patients with exudative pleural effusion of unclear etiology. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the step-up strategy (UEPB first, reserving thoracoscopy for non-diagnostic cases) non-inferior to immediate medical thoracoscopy in diagnostic yield? Does the step-up strategy provide advantages in safety, patient tolerance, hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness compared to immediate thoracoscopy? Researchers will compare a step-up strategy (initial UEPB, followed by medical thoracoscopy if UEPB is non-diagnostic) versus immediate medical thoracoscopic pleural biopsy to see if the step-up approach achieves comparable diagnostic accuracy while potentially reducing procedure-related burden and healthcare resource use. Participants will: Be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the step-up strategy arm or the immediate medical thoracoscopy arm. If assigned to the step-up arm: undergo UEPB under local anesthesia; if the biopsy is non-diagnostic, proceed to semi-rigid medical thoracoscopy. If assigned to the immediate thoracoscopy arm: undergo semi-rigid medical thoracoscopic pleural biopsy as the initial and sole diagnostic procedure. Provide tissue samples for histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses as clinically indicated. Complete short-term follow-up at 7 days post-procedure (by telephone or clinic visit) to monitor adverse events and symptom recovery. If initially diagnosed with non-specific benign disease or remain undiagnosed, complete a long-term follow-up at 12 months to establish a final diagnosis.
NCT07186933
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of perioperative mechanical ventilation (MV), specifically Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) and MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP), in relation to the appearance of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult patients who are operated and have higher risk of PPCs. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is MV with lower ΔP better than conventional PMV in preventing PPCs in patients with higher risk for PPCs? * Does MV with lower ΔP decrease hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) need and mortality? * Does MV with lower ΔP suit better than PMV to lung characteristics and needs intraoperatively? Researchers will compare MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP) to Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) to see if any of this is more protective than the other concerning PPCs. All participants will receive perioperative MV. Half of them will receive conventional Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV). This will include well known generally protective settings for mechanical ventilation of patients, concerning volumes, pressures, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. The rest of participants will be ventilated with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP). This will be similar to PMV in the chosen volumes, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. However, the pressure inside lung at the end of expiration, eg Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), will be not be preset for every patient. Initially, the investigators will perform a maneuver that will quantify each individual's lung characteristics and mechanics. According to this, the investigators will find the exact PEEP that seems to suit each patients lungs most, and use this perioperatively, trying to provide lungs the best conditions every time. After the completion of the operation, all the patients will be screened for PPCs, via arterial blood testing and chest X ray, and the results will be statistically analyzed trying to find if any of the forementioned strategies of mechanical ventilation surpasses the other concerning PPCs appearance. PPCs include atelectasis, respiratory failure, bronchospasm, pleural effusion, pneumonia, aspiration and pneumothorax. Furthermore hospital stay, ICU need and mortality will be noted. Finally, measurements of perioperative lung pressures, volumes and derived variables will be noted and compared statistically as well.
NCT06686251
This study aims to evaluate whether the use of AI as a physician support tool is associated with an increase in the detection rate of chest radiographic findings in adults with respiratory complaints, compared to diagnosis performed exclusively by doctors, without AI support. This is a cluster-randomized clinical trial, following the stepped wedge design, and adhering to the guidelines of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT). In this study, the Diagnostic Support Solution for Chest X-rays - LungAnalysis (LuAna), developed by the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (HIAE) within the PROADI-SUS Banco de Imagens, was used. The clinical trial will be conducted in multiple centers with a diverse population from the public health system, to ensure that the algorithms are validated across a broad demographic profile. The expected benefits are significant, providing greater security for patients, increasing doctors' confidence in interpreting chest X-rays, promoting efficiency and cost savings for healthcare services, and offering promising prospects for other AI applications in imaging diagnostics.
NCT07206940
Pleural effusion and pneumothorax are common conditions encountered in pulmonology departments and may require chest drainage. However, the chest drainage procedure can cause anxiety in patients, leading to discomfort during the procedure. The use of virtual reality (VR) for anxiety reduction has shown promising results in various medical contexts.
NCT07208409
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) imposes a high burden on the healthcare system in the Asian Pacific region, as lung and breast cancer are the commonest cancers associated with malignant pleural effusion, as the two commonest cancers in the Asian Pacific region. While indwelling pleural catheter (IPC), a catheter that is inserted for long-term drainage of pleural fluid, is not commonly used in Asian countries, small-bore chest tubes are increasingly used due to their ease of insertion and causing less pain. Injecting talc, a chemocal, to promote adhesion of pleura, called talc pleurodesis was an effective method of managing MPE. However, the optimal size of small-bore chest tubes and the feasibility of talc pleurodesis have not been thoroughly investigated. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and success rate of pleurodesis using small-bore chest drains and to examine the outcomes associated with different sizes of these drains, namely 8 Fr, 12 Fr, and 14 Fr, in managing MPE. The primary outcome is the feasibility of talc pleurodesis with different small-bore chest tubes. Secondary outcomes include the differences in recurrence rates post-pleurodesis between small-bore and ultra-small-bore chest tubes, as well as patient outcomes such as pain scores, SpO2/FiO2 ratios (oxygen saturation/fractional inspired oxygen ratio), and complications. The sample size will be 60, and the project will be carried out over one year. The outcome of this study can serve as a reference for managing MPE regarding the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ultra-small-bore chest tubes worldwide, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region, where IPC is less common.
NCT02092155
Some patients that have a tunneled pleural catheter will not have the pleural fluid (water around the lung) return after some time (pleurodesis). The purpose of this study is to understand how the investigators can predict who will achieve pleurodesis and how this occurs by studying the pleural effusion.
NCT06958848
The aim of the study is to evaluate postoperative pain in patients receiving a small-bore (16F) chest drain compared to those receiving the standard large-bore (24F) chest drain after minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy and/or segmentectomy.
NCT05620329
Research with biospecimens such as blood, tissue, or body fluids can help researchers understand how the human body works. Researchers can make new tests to find diseases, understand how treatments work, or find new ways to treat a disease. The purpose of this study is to collect biospecimens for research from patients with known or suspected lung cancer. The information learned from the biospecimens may be used in future treatments. The purpose of this protocol is to create a pleural fluid registry for use in future studies.
NCT03235999
Up to 20 patients with malignant pleural effusions will be interviewed about their experiences of having this condition and its management.
NCT07120867
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if performing a pleural fluid drainage (thoracentesis) together with the measurement of pressure inside the chest (pleural manometry) during the same procedure can help doctors choose the best treatment for each patient with malignant pleural effusion.The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the use of pleural manometry associated with a higher success rate in managing malignant pleural effusion through pleurodesis? * Can the use of pleural manometry help guide optimal therapeutic decision-making in malignant pleural effusion? Researchers will compare the success of the chosen treatment in patients who undergo pleural manometry to those who do not, to see if pleural manometry helps improve treatment outcomes for malignant pleural effusion. Participants will: * Receive treatment according to the hospital's standard clinical practice for managing malignant pleural effusion. * If assigned to the manometry group, they will undergo pleural manometry during their first thoracentesis. * If the manometry results suggest that the lung can fully expand, they will be referred for pleurodesis-just as patients in the non-manometry group are. * If the manometry results suggest that the lung cannot fully expand, pleurodesis will not be recommended due to the high risk of failure. Instead, placement of a tunneled pleural catheter will be advised to help control symptoms.