Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 295 trials
NCT07667231
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy and functional outcomes of the quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) and the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve(LFCN) block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome is the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative total opioid consumption, ıncidence of quadriceps motor block, time to first ambulation, block performance time, falls, length of hospital stay, block- related complications(hematoma,local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
NCT07659743
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of innovative intervention of breathing controlled electrical stimulation (BreEStim) and sham BreEStim and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in management of neuropathic pain in patients after spinal cord injury (SCI).
NCT07653906
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB) reduces pain in adults with upper abdominal malignancies. It will also evaluate the safety of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does NSNB reduce pain intensity compared to Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB), as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)? What adverse effects do participants experience when receiving Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB)? Investigators will compare Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB) with Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB) to determine which intervention provides more effective and safer pain relief. Participants will: * receive either NSNB or NCPB under fluoroscopic guidance * be monitored immediately and for 2 hours after the procedure for any complications Have their pain intensity recorded immediately after the procedure, and at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months * be evaluated for quality-of-life using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 3 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 1 month and 3 months. * have their opioid consumption tracked throughout the study.
NCT06889870
Breast cancer is the malignant neoplasm with the highest incidence in women in Brazil, with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors. Breast cancer surgery is an important part of treatment and post-operative pain needs to be adequately prevented and treated. This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study aims to evaluate the efficacy of interfascial pectoral nerve block (PECS II) compared to local anesthetic infiltration at the surgical site in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in terms of pain and nausea. Data collection will be carried out at the Nossa Senhora das Dores Hospital with 133 patients, who will be divided into two groups: the PEC group will undergo PECS II blockade and the LOC group will undergo local anesthetic infiltration at the surgical site. Both interventions will be performed after the induction of opioid-free/sparing balanced general anesthesia. At the end of surgery, the patients will be taken to the post-anesthetic recovery room (PACU), where post-operative pain will be monitored on arrival and at 30-minute intervals up to two hours after surgery, and before the patient is discharged the following day. A visual analog scale (VAS) will be used, and PONVs will also be recorded. After a 2-hour stay in the PACU, they will be transferred to the ward, and after 24 hours, they will be reassessed using the same parameters. Opioid consumption will be recorded in the PACU and during hospitalization, as well as the occurrence of nausea or vomiting and compared between the groups, and side effects and complications will be monitored.
NCT07614607
Effective intraoperative and postoperative pain management is critical for patient comfort and recovery, yet traditional methods for assessing pain under general anaesthesia are limited by their subjective nature and reliance on vital signs. Automated pupillometry, which gives the parameters of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) components, offers an objective and quantitative approach to evaluating nociception and pain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the automated pupillometry in enhancing early postoperative pain control and to assess its utility in guiding opioid administration during the perioperative period. A prospective, non-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 68 patients undergoing laparotomy for gastrointestinal surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an interventional group, where analgesia is guided by automated pupillometry measurements, or a control group receiving standard pain management. Key outcomes include the time to first rescue analgesia, self-reported pain scores, opioid consumption. The automated pupillometry measurements will be taken at key surgical moments, including before induction, pre-incision, and during recovery. Pain scores and rescue analgesia use will be compared between groups using appropriate statistical tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves will analyze time to first rescue analgesia. Regression analyses will explore the relationship between pupillometry readings and postoperative pain. It is anticipated that the automated pupillometry guided group will experience longer intervals before requiring rescue analgesia and report lower pain scores, suggesting improved pain management and reduced opioid use. This study could validate automated pupillometry as an innovative tool for optimizing postoperative pain management, potentially improving patient outcomes by enabling more precise and effective analgesia in surgical settings.
NCT07377877
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques currently used in clinical practice to improve postoperative pain control as part of multimodal analgesia strategies. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common minimally invasive surgical procedure; however, patients may still experience postoperative pain that can increase opioid consumption and delay recovery. Identifying the most effective regional anesthesia technique may improve postoperative analgesia and patient recovery. In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral EOIB or bilateral ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications will be evaluated during the first 24 hours after surgery. The study aims to provide comparative clinical evidence regarding the analgesic effectiveness of these two regional anesthesia techniques.
NCT06834243
This retrospective study evaluates the effects of two different administration methods of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, and recovery in patients undergoing hip surgery. All patients in the study received: * PENG block via a catheter * Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with tramadol * Multimodal analgesia, including IV paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as rescue analgesia The study compares two groups: 1. Intermittent Bolus Group: A researcher administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours. 2. Continuous Infusion Group: A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously. Both groups received the same total volume of local anesthetic over 24 hours. All PENG blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. This study aims to determine whether intermittent bolus or continuous infusion PENG block administration leads to better pain control, lower opioid consumption, and improved recovery outcomes.
NCT07577908
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block compared to Intercostal Nerve (ICN) block in terms of postoperative pain control, reduction of opioid analgesic consumption, minimization of postoperative respiratory complications, and increase patient satisfaction (using a 5-point Likert scale) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
NCT07549386
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if fixed-dose combination etoricoxib 90 mg + diacerein 50 mg capsule works to treat knee/hip osteoarthritis-associated pain in adults. It will also learn about the safety of the drug. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does etoricoxib+diacerein reduce pain intensity as per WOMAC scale after 60 days? What medical problems do participants have when taking etoricoxib 90 mg+diacerein 50 mg capsule for 60 days? Researchers will compare the test drug etoricoxib 90 mg+diacerein 50 mg capsule to an active comparator (meloxicam 15 mg + diacereina 50 mg) to see if drug ABC works to treat pain in patients with osteoarthritis. Participants will: Take drug the test or comparator drugs every day for 60 days. Visit the clinic once a month for health and outcomes follow-up. Keep a diary of their symptoms, pain intensity, WOMAC scale, adverse events, rescue medication use, other used drugs, and treatment adherence.
NCT07212725
Brief Summary The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a neuroscience-informed, peer-led self-management program can promote behavior change and reduce pain interference in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) and chronic pain. The primary aim is to support participants in developing practical, sustainable strategies for managing chronic pain through education, reflection, and consistent application of self-management tools. The program is designed to shift participants from passive recipients of care to active agents in their own pain management process. Chronic pain is highly prevalent among individuals with SCI, and many report that traditional treatments - primarily pharmacological - provide limited relief and are accompanied by significant side effects. There is a growing need for accessible, non-clinical interventions that empower individuals to manage pain based on the latest neuroscience and behavior change principles. Solving SCI Pain intervention is a 7-week, multi-component program grounded in brain-based pain science, neuroplasticity, and behavior change models. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the intervention lead to meaningful changes in behavior that support pain self-management? * Does it reduce pain interference in everyday life? Participants will: * Attend three 2-hour group education sessions focused on the neuroscience of pain, the role of fear-avoidance, pain-related beliefs, and body-based self-regulation tools (e.g., movement, Graston, percussion massage, and red light therapy). * Participate in four individual coaching sessions (up to 1 hour each) designed to help them reflect on their experiences, overcome barriers, and integrate the tools into daily life. * Follow individualized coaching recommendations and provided resources to support each participant's unique engagement with cognitive and body-based tools over the 7-week period, including light journaling, goal setting, and guided reflections. * Complete brief check-ins every four days to monitor progress, engagement, and self-reported outcomes. Group and coaching sessions will be recorded and transcribed to support qualitative analysis, allowing researchers to understand how the intervention is experienced and delivered. This will help refine the program for future implementation and scaling. The study prioritizes accessibility, relevance, and peer involvement to address the real-world needs of individuals living with SCI and chronic pain.
NCT07368413
This prospective randomized study will compare the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block combined with Pectoral Nerve Block Type II (SAPB + PECS II) on intraoperative analgesia and postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Seventy patients (ASA I-III, aged 18-75 years) will be randomized into two groups using the sealed envelope method. Ultrasound-guided blocks will be performed preoperatively by the same anesthesiologist, with Group 1 receiving ESPB and Group 2 receiving a combined SAPB + PECS II technique performed through a single skin puncture (single needle entry site) with sequential injections into the two target fascial planes. All patients will undergo surgery under general anesthesia and receive postoperative analgesia via morphine patient-controlled analgesia. Pain scores and total opioid consumption will be statistically analyzed, with p \< 0.05 considered significant.
NCT07201987
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using calcium sulfate beads that contain vancomycin (an antibiotic) and pain-relieving medicines during spine surgery can improve recovery compared to standard care with intravenous (IV) morphine and local pain medicines. Researchers want to know if the sustained release formulation of morphine from these calcium sulfate beads affect: * Postoperative length of stay * Postoperative pain scores * Postoperative narcotic analgesic requirements All participants in this study will already be scheduled to have spine surgery as part of their regular medical care. During surgery, participants will be assigned to receive either intraoperative placement of calcium sulfate beads with vancomycin alone or vancomycin with morphine and bupivacaine. All patients will still have access to standard of care with IV and PO pain regimens. Participants will then be followed after surgery to measure their pain, recovery, and medication use. Participation is voluntary, and choosing not to join will not affect a person's medical care.
NCT07484997
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Concentrated Growth Factor (CGF) plugs help improve bone healing and reduce pain after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The study aims to answer the following: Does packing CGF plugs into the extraction site improve bone density? Does the use of CGF plugs reduce postoperative pain for the patient? Researchers will evaluate the healing outcomes of patients receiving this treatment in a prospective case series study. Because this is a case series, all participants will receive the CGF plug intervention rather than being compared to a placebo group. Participants in this study will: Undergo a blood draw to create the autologous CGF plug from their own growth factors. Undergo the surgical extraction of an impacted lower third molar under local anesthesia. Have a CGF plug placed in the extraction socket immediately following the tooth removal. Report their pain levels using a numeric scale on Day 1, Day 3, and Day 7 after surgery. Return for a follow-up CBCT scan three months after the procedure to evaluate bone density changes.
NCT07208799
The rationale of the current research is to address the limitation of existing knowledge as it is not clear which of the two drugs (Dexamethasone or Methylprednisolone) is more effective in reduction of postoperative sequelae in patient with mandibular parasymphysis fracture. This study fills the gap by providing sound evidence on the preferred steroid option to help clinicians have more data to make decisions and improve patients' health. The result of this research will then be added to the evidence-based protocols for the treatment of parasymphysis fractures.
NCT05964868
The objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in post-operative pain after septorhinoplasty when long-acting liposomal bupivacaine is used for local anesthesia compared to other standard local anesthetic regimens.
NCT07191964
This prospective, triple-blinded, sham-controlled randomized trial evaluates the additive effect of Supra-Sartorial Subcutaneous Infiltration (SSSI) combined with intermittent adductor canal block (iACB) and posterior capsule local infiltration analgesia (PC-LIA) for pain management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). SSSI, a simpler alternative to targeted anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN) block, is tested in 90 adults (45-90 years) randomized into two arms: sham SSSI + active iACB + PC-LIA versus all active interventions. Primary outcome is pain scores on postoperative day 0; secondary outcomes include daily pain trajectory, opioid use, functional recovery, and complications over days 0-3.
NCT07502742
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine how male and female former athletes experience pain and respond to moderate-intensity exercise (strength versus aerobic) compared with both current master's athletes and nonathletes. The main questions this study aims to address are: 1. How do former athletes, master's athletes, and nonathletes experience pain? 2. How do different types of moderate-intensity exercise (strength versus aerobic exercise) influence pain in former athletes, master's athletes, and nonathletes? Participants will complete 3 different testing sessions: 1. Baseline testing including assessments of strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and pain; 2. Strength exercise: pain assessments will occur before and after moderate-intensity strength training exercise; 3. Aerobic exercise: pain assessments will occur before and after moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. There will be a washout period of approximately one week or greater between each of the three different testing sessions. The order of conditions (strength versus aerobic exercise) will be randomized (crossover randomized trial design).
NCT07501676
This study will test whether gentle electrical stimulation to nerves near the uterus can reduce pelvic pain after uterine fibroid embolization. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving active TUNES stimulation will experience lower pain levels and improved early recovery compared to those receiving sham stimulation or standard care.
NCT07489872
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine and rectus sheath block compared with standard postoperative analgesia for pain management in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery with a midline incision. Effective postoperative analgesia is essential to enhance recovery, reduce opioid consumption, and improve overall patient comfort. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, eligible patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery through a midline incision will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: intrathecal morphine, rectus sheath block, or control (standard postoperative analgesia without regional intervention). Postoperative outcomes will include pain scores, quality of recovery (QoR) scores, functional recovery parameters, patient satisfaction, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and rescue analgesic requirements. The findings of this study may provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these analgesic strategies and contribute to the development of optimized multimodal pain management protocols in lower abdominal surgery.
NCT07410000
This prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluates the analgesic effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane (QIP) block in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. The QIP block is a recently described fascial plane block. Patients will be randomized to receive either a QIP block with local anesthetic or a sham block with saline. The primary outcome is 24-hour opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes include motor block, dermatomal sensory assessment, pain scores, rescue analgesic requirement, quality of recovery (QoR-15), and opioid-related side effects.