Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-14 of 14 trials
NCT05983029
Our aim is to investigate whether a novel landmark, the groove between the buttocks or the intergluteal cleft, can facilitate the identification of the neuraxial midline in obstetric patients when compared to ultrasound as the reference standard for the determination of this midline
NCT05704179
The goal of this prospective observational study is to learn about the correlation between obstetric comorbidity index and obstetric quality of recovery score in pregnant patients who undergo cesarean section. The main question aims to answer are: * Are there a correlation between the obstetric comorbidity index and the obstetric quality of recovery score? Can we predict the postoperative quality of recovery by calculating the obstetric comorbidity index before delivery? * What is the relationship between these scores with the type of anaesthesia given? Participants will answer an 11-question assessment scale to evaluate their recovery of quality in the postpartum period.
NCT05973435
The goal of this observational study is to assess the level of oxidative stress during cesarean section depending on the type of anesthesia applied and to determine the factors that can affect the level of oxidative stress. The main questions it aims to answer are: * is there any association between specific parameters of pregnancy, socio-demographic characteristics and laboratory analyses with an increased level of oxidative stress * is there any association between type of anesthesia for ceasarean section with an increased level of oxidative stress Blood sample would be taken from the participants in the study for these analyses on three occasions in 3 test tubes (before cesarean section, during cesarean section and after cesarean section). Researchers will compare patients that received general anesthesia with patients under spinal regional anesthesia to see if there is any difference in level of oxidative stress measured by laboratory parameters.
NCT05348083
Management of pain after caesarean section represents an important anesthesiologic issue, since it is often suboptimal, leading to delayed functional recovery and chronic pain. Currently, the postoperative analgesic strategy mostly relies on intrathecal morphine (ITM) and multimodal analgesic regimen. Recently, the need for alterative opioid sparing techniques is emerging. Paraspinal fascial plane blocks, as quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) performed at T9 level, have therefore been proposed as alternatives to ITM, because of their demonstrated effect on visceral and somatic pain. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy, the feasibility and safety of bilateral ESPB compared to bilateral QLB for the management of postoperative pain after ceasarean section conducted under spinal anesthesia without ITM.
NCT04037085
The objective of this study is evaluate the breastmilk transfer and pharmacokinetics (Part 1) and effectiveness (Part 2) of a post-cesarean delivery intravenous ketamine bolus-and-infusion strategy, as a preventive analgesic modality to reduce pain and opioid requirements. In Part 1, physiochemical analysis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and breastmilk transfer of ketamine and its metabolites will be assessed. Additionally calculated estimations for neonatal and infant exposure will be assessed. In Part 2, PK/PD assessments will continue in a larger cohort; endpoints will also include postpartum pain, depression scores, central sensitization measures, patient-reported postpartum recovery scores, breastfeeding, and parent-infant bonding, assessed in the acute post-cesarean period and up to 12 weeks postpartum in a randomized controlled trial.
NCT04637386
Adequate pain control after cesarean delivery is a significant concern both for parturients and obstetric anesthesiologists. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and local Wound infiltration with anesthetics are alternatives for reducing the severity of pain, total analgesic consumption, and opioid side effects. Both the TAP block and wound infiltration are superior to placebo; however, it is unknown which provides better analgesia after cesarean delivery because of a scarcity of randomized clinical trials. So, we hypothesized that the TAP block would decrease postoperative pain and postoperative cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours
NCT04192045
Quality of recovery is an important outcome measure in anaesthesia, whilst there are validated tools for this in surgery and regional anesthesia there are no fully validated tools for obstetrics anaesthesia. The aim of this study is to use the Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR) score across multiple centres to assess correlation to length of stay and variation for different types of operative and non- operative delivery.
NCT05264987
Although several studies are conducted in the general population researching the clinical and laboratory parameters predicting the progression to severe disease in COVID-19, the data are very few in obstetric patients. Therefore,the investigators aimed to evaluate the characteristics, prognosis, laboratory parameters, and mortality of obstetric patients followed up in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to severe COVID-19 disease and to determine the factors affecting mortality.
NCT04011098
Labour pain can be intensified for labour inductions and women undergoing inductions often have earlier and more frequent requests for analgesia. Current evidence suggests that epidural analgesia effectively manages pain in labour, but may give rise to adverse effects for both the mother and neonate. Opioids are often added to epidurals to improve the quality of analgesia. Despite reassuring findings regarding epidural opioids, other investigators have found an association between epidural opioids and neonatal respiratory distress, lower Neurological and Adaptive Capacity scores, and reduced rates of breastfeeding. Given the heightened implications for the mother and neonate in situations requiring induction of labour, the desire for a positive outcome whilst still providing adequate maternal analgesia is paramount. This study thus aims to investigate whether a preliminary epidural Fentanyl bolus at the initiation of the epidural may help to improve analgesia for women undergoing labour inductions for post-term pregnancy in a safe manner. Importantly, the main rationale of this proposed practice being that by achieving adequate epidural analgesia earlier in the labour induction, this may lead to better pain control overall and less overall requirements for epidural PCEA boluses and epidural "top-ups" as the induction progresses.
NCT01054209
This study will demonstrate whether an electric warming mattress can reduce the number of patients who get cold and shiver after elective cesarean section. Peri-operative hypothermia (body temperature below 36 ºC) is a cause of post-operative complications and patient discomfort. Immediately post-operatively such discomfort is due to increased pain and shivering. Patients say that their time in the recovery ward is very stressful and this is prolonged if they become cold (hypothermic)or shiver. Subsequently, patients can suffer with increased risk of infections and delayed discharge from hospital. For patients (and their babies) having Cesarean sections it is important to start breast feeding as soon as possible, but being cold may delay this. For some types of surgery measures are put in place to stop patients becoming cold and thereby reduce the number of problems. However this is not the case with patients undergoing Cesarean sections because the special blankets through which hot air is blown to keep them warm are inappropriate for mothers giving birth by Cesarean section as it would make it difficult for a mother to have good skin-to-skin contact with her new baby immediately after delivery - an important part in the bonding process. A solution is to use a new warming mattress. This has been shown to be safe and effective with some types of surgery, but has not been tested in Cesarean sections. In the investigators study,the investigators will warm a group of patients undergoing planned Cesarean section and compare them to an unwarmed group to see if there is any difference primarily in post-operative temperature. Secondarily, the investigators will also look for differences in total blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion, wound infection, shivering, the immediate health of the baby, time taken to become fit for discharge from recovery, length of hospital stay and time to breast-feeding.
NCT03842046
The aim of this double-blind randomized study will be to compare a fixed-rate prophylactic noradrenaline infusion to a fixed-rate prophylactic phenylephrine infusion during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
NCT03013140
Whether the usage of non-invasive arterial blood pressure monitor to guide fluid therapy in caesarean section can effectively reduce the incidence of hypotension and fetal complications.
NCT03790124
Neuraxial techniques are widely used in obstetric practice to provide analgesia and anesthesia. A common complication associated with neuraxial anesthesia is post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), resulting from unintentional or unintended puncture of the dura mater during insertion of an epidural needle. Incidence of PDPH after spinal anesthesia is very low due to the widespread use of non-cutting small diameter spinal needles. Incidence of "wet tap" during epidural injection has been reported to be 1.5%, with 52-85% of these patients developing PDPH. When an obstetric patient develops PDPH, institution of an effective treatment is necessary. Although PDPH tends to resolve spontaneously over a couple of weeks, it carries the risk of potential complications. PDPH interfere with the ability of the mother to take care of her baby, increases the risk of chronic headache and limits early ambulation, thereby increasing the risk of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. As important as treating PDPH when it occurs is to prevent it when the dura is accidentally punctured during labor epidural placement. Multiple therapeutic strategies have been reported in the medical literature to prevent this outcome. Preventive measures range from conservative strategies to invasive procedures. Bedrest and hydration have been traditionally recommended to try to prevent PDPH when a wet tap occurs; however, no conclusive evidence supports their use. The use of oral and intravenous caffeine is insufficiently supported by clinical evidence. Epidural morphine and intravenous cosyntropin have been successfully used to prevent PDPH. Epidural injection of normal saline reduces the gradient for CSF leak. The use of saline has shown variable results in different studies. Although the results of some studies show insufficient evidence about its effectiveness, administration of epidural saline is a technique relatively devoid of significant adverse effects. The institutional protocol recommends the combination of a multimodal approach to prevention of PDPH after accidental dural puncture, based on strategies reported in the medical literature. The protocol consists of the immediate administration of 60 cc of epidural normal saline, followed by two preventive measures administered after delivery. After delivery, 1 mg of intravenous cosyntropin and 3 mg of epidural morphine before catheter removal are administered. This study tests the hypothesis that the multimodal prophylactic protocol described above decreases the incidence of PDPH and the need to perform epidural blood patch, compared to other strategies or no prophylactic management.
NCT03100396
DREAMY is a prospective, multi-centre observational cohort study using a mixed methods approach to provide quantitative and qualitative data on accidental awareness under general anaesthesia (AAGA) in obstetric surgery patients. Obstetric patients undergoing surgery, such as emergency caesarian section under general anaesthesia, are thought to be at higher risk than any other surgical cohorts for AAGA. Patients recruited to the study will be screened for AAGA using a standardised questionnaire on three occasions over 30 days. Follow up with structured interviews for all AAGA patients will occur over 12 months.