Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-7 of 7 trials
NCT07178119
The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether the Bridging Technique can safely and effectively treat nasolabial folds (NLF, also known as smile lines) in adults. The main questions are: Does the Bridging Technique, which places very small amounts of filler in thin horizontal threads (less than 0.05 milliliters \[ml\] per retrograde placement), improve the appearance of nasolabial folds? Is the treatment safe, and are participants satisfied with the results? The Bridging Technique is a new method of filler injection where very small amounts of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler are placed in thin horizontal lines under the fold using a blunt cannula. These small "bridges" of filler act like internal support, helping to lift and soften the fold without overfilling or distorting the natural shape of the face. Participants will: Receive an HA dermal filler (AILEENE Vol. 2) injected with the Bridging Technique to both nasolabial folds. Attend follow-up visits at Week 2 (virtual safety check), Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6. Have photographs taken at baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6, which will be reviewed by independent observers who are blinded to the visit sequence. Complete short questionnaires about their satisfaction and experience. The study includes 60 adults aged 30 to 65 years. Each participant may receive up to 1.0 ml of filler in total across both folds. An optional top-up treatment may be offered at Week 2 or Week 4 if clinically indicated, using only the remaining balance of the total 1.0 ml allowance. Any top-up will be performed with a new, sterile syringe, not with filler physically left over from the first visit. There is no cost to participants, and participation is voluntary.
NCT07160777
The aim of the study is to verify safety and performance of Semical dermal fillers according to real-world data.
NCT06961448
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polycaprolactone microsphere filler (Lafullen) for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds in adults aged 18 and above, regardless of gender. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does Lafullen improve wrinkle severity in the nasolabial fold area at 48 weeks post-injection (WSRS responder rate)? * Is Lafullen superior to the control product (Restylane, a hyaluronic acid filler) in terms of long-term wrinkle correction and safety? Researchers will compare Lafullen (polycaprolactone filler) with Restylane (modified sodium hyaluronate gel) to see if Lafullen provides superior wrinkle correction at 12 months post-injection. Participants will: * Receive either Lafullen or Restylane via injection in the nasolabial fold area. * Optionally receive a touch-up injection at 4 weeks after the first treatment if needed. * Undergo regular follow-up visits at 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks post-treatment. * Subjects in the Lafullen group will continue follow-up up to 72 weeks to assess long-term efficacy and safety. * Be assessed through clinical photography, pain scale (VAS), satisfaction questionnaires, and safety evaluations (e.g., AEs, vital signs, lab tests).
NCT04971876
Evaluation of the safety and performance of the investigational device in its three concentrations for cheek and lips augmentation and correction of the nasolabial folds, assuming that the performance of the product will be demonstrated based on the responder rates observed compared to baseline.
NCT02991040
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + (with Lidocaine) versus Revanesse® Ultra for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse® Ultra + (with lidocaine, hereafter referred to as Revanesse Ultra +) to Revanesse Ultra for subjects undergoing correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs)
NCT02987205
A randomized, multicenter, double blind, split-face study in subjects seeking NLF correction. Subjects were treated with Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face and Restylane in the NLF on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each product was randomly assigned. The investigator performing the evaluations and the subject were blinded to the treatment; injections of the study product were performed by an unblinded injecting investigator.
NCT02984878
To compare improvement with retreatment for all subjects undergoing correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs) in the initial SYM2014-02 study, who were retreated with Revanesse Ultra at Visit 6/Week 24 and to determine the safety of repeat injections of Revanesse Ultra. The retreatment phase was optional.