Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-3 of 3 trials
NCT07494162
This study will evaluate the clinical and biological effects of acupuncture for chronic low back pain associated with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). In this randomized, participant- and assessor-blinded clinical trial, 64 adults with chronic low back pain due to MPS will be assigned to receive either true acupuncture or sham acupuncture for eight weeks. Participants will undergo total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) imaging and complete standardized pain and functional questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. The study will evaluate whether acupuncture improves pain and function compared with sham treatment and whether TB-PET/CT imaging can detect changes in myofascial tissue metabolism and perfusion that correspond with clinical outcomes.
NCT07351331
Invasive physiotherapy techniques, such as Intratissue Percutaneous Electroly-sis (IPE), have numerous beneficial effects depending on the pathology being treated, in-cluding the deactivation of myofascial trigger points (MTP) caused by myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). The objectives are (1) evaluate the effectiveness of low intesity IPE treatment com-pared to DN on the shortening of FHB in patients with MPS, in 4 and 12 weeks evaluation, (2) assess the distribution of plantar pressures after the interventions and (3) evaluate the modification of FHB activation following the interventions.
NCT07315776
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) combined with Active Stretching (AS) (EMS+AS) and EMS+AS combined with Trigger Point Pressure Release (TPR) (EMS+AS+TPR) are effective treatments for Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) in working adults. The study will also assess the safety of the EMS+AS intervention. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do EMS+AS and EMS+AS+TPR lead to greater pain reduction, increased pressure pain threshold, and improved surface electromyography (sEMG) activity when compared to standard treatments? Furthermore, what is the participant feedback regarding EMS+AS and other treatments? Researchers will compare EMS+AS to passive stretching (PS) and TPR to see if EMS+AS and EMS+AS+TPR are effective in treating myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle. Participants will receive seven interventions across a single visit, including PS, EMS+AS, TPR, TPR combined with AS (TPR+AS), EMS+AS+TPR, Sham stimulation, and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). Each treatment will consist of three 10-second sets with a 10-second rest between sets, and a 2-minute break provided between different treatments. Participants will have measurements taken on changes in pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and sEMG activity during trapezius action pre- and post-treatment. Additionally, participants will report personal information, previous MPS treatments, and baseline health status, and provide feedback on satisfaction, treatment preferences, exercise knowledge for MPS prevention, and qualitative comments. For supplementary data, we selected only the EMS+AS and TPR interventions with the same protocol to evaluate changes in range of motion and changes in trigger point size and trapezius thickness (both at rest and during stretching) via ultrasound imaging.