Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-17 of 17 trials
NCT07122089
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, being the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with approximately 745 000 deaths reported annually. For advanced patients, including patients with tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT), most treatment guidelines recommend systemic therapy, either combination immunotherapy (IO) or combination of immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic treatment for first line option. Results for PVT patients are provided in one trial with a median overall survival of 14.2 months with IO underlying the necessity to improve treatment of PVT patients. Two recent other phase 3 trials also reported positive results for different IO regimen. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 (90Y)-loaded glass microspheres (TheraSphereTM) can be used for patients with early stage to locally advanced HCC including PVT patients without extrahepatic spread (EHS). TheraSphereTM is recognized and is reimbursed in France for PVT patients without EHS, since 2019.Several retrospective studies have shown promising results for PVT patients. Nowadays use of SIRT in locally advanced HCC is regaining interest based on the results of the randomized DOSISPHERE-01 study including non-operable patients, about 70% with PVT. This randomized Phase II trial using 90Y-loaded microspheres sought was noted the effectiveness of 90Y-loaded microspheres using a personalized dosimetry approach versus a standard dosimetry approach. The use of a systemic treatment as IO after a locoregional treatment with the strong local debulking effect of SIRT is logical and of interest. Indeed, the most frequent pattern of progression after SIRT is recurrence in an untreated area, including untreated liver or EHS. Patients are then usually referred to IO. Such kind of therapeutic approach, using SIRT followed by IO has already been evaluated in a phase 2 study using nivolumab after 90Y loaded resin microspheres with promising efficacy without safety deterioration. The aim of this study is to evaluate SIRT followed by IO used according to their current indications in advanced HCC patient with PVT patients and without EHS.
NCT05901194
Currently in France, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents over 30% of indications of liver transplantation (LT) (# 500 cases/year). Chemoembolization (TACE) is the most commonly used bridge treatment in those patients (estimate 60%). These patients will present with a complete response in only 60 % of the cases (# 180 patients per year in France) and failure in 40 % of the cases (# 120 patients per year in France). A systemic treatment using lenvatinib might provide a benefit in patients presenting with a non-resectable HCC in waiting list for LT and with a TACE failure (i.e. those with an active disease and a partial response or a stable disease or a progressive disease on imaging data, in particular when AFP remains significantly increased after 2 TACE) by decreasing dropout rate before LT and decreasing recurrence rate post-LT without new safety signal.
NCT06707233
This is a phase II clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SIRT in patients with HCC greater than 7 cm. After enrollment, patients received yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy. The primary endpoint of the study is objective reponse rate (ORR) as assessed by mRECIST. Secondary endpoints were: objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by RECIST 1.1, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety (incidence and severity of adverse events).
NCT05911633
The primary objective of the study is to confirm safety and technical success of BioPearl™ microspheres loaded with Doxorubicin in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The secondary objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy of BioPearl™ microspheres loaded with Doxorubicin in the treatment of subjects with unresectable HCC.
NCT06187961
This is an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. The purpose of study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and cadonilimab as conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
NCT06561399
This is an Open-label, Multicenter, Phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), Lenvatinib combination with Sintilimab (Triple Therapy) sequential radiotherapy in patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (uHCC).
NCT06535737
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver cancer and a leading cancer death worldwide. Currently, atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination is the standard of care for patients with advanced HCC. There have not been proven therapy for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Cabozantinib is a proven therapy for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. The study aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with advanced previously treated with atezolziumab and bevacizumab. It is a multi-center single-arm study which all participants will receive cabozantinib. Participants will continue cabozantinib until. disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.
NCT04224636
Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of up-front atezolizumab/ bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) followed by on-demand selective transarterial chemoembolization (sdTACE) and of initial synchronous treatment with TACE and Atezo/Bev in the treatment of unresectable HCC patients.
NCT06397222
This study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab plus Y-90 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for patients with unresectable intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
NCT05114148
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma often die from intrahepatic disease because current treatment options are limited. Local treatment using 166Ho-radioembolization (166Ho-RE) offers a safe and effective treatment. Because 166Ho-microspheres are used as a scout dose for treatment simulaton and for the actual treatment itself, a tailored approach can be used. This concept has proven to be more predictive than the 90Y-radioembolization concept (current standard-of-care), which is a based on a surrogate scout dose (i.e. 99mTc-MAA). A personal treatment plan may be used for 166Ho-radioembolization to optimize efficacy, based on scout dose distribution. However, individualized treatment planning inherently leads to treatment doses that deviate from the currently approved 'one-size-fits-all' approach (i.e. 60 Gy average absorbed dose for all patients). Therefore, safety of individualized 166Ho-RE will be evaluated first to validate safety and confirm safety thresholds. These thresholds will be used in subsequent randomized controlled studies.
NCT04967482
This study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) as the conversion therapy for unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
NCT05390112
Cohort study to assess the impact of ctDNA detection in the follow-up and management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by TACE
NCT03138031
Assessment of the long-term outcome of percutaneous ethanol alcohol injection (PEI) for the large and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: single center non-randomized trial.
NCT03564405
Pilot Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of UNI-DEB for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT03283956
To evaluate efficacy and safety profile of DC bead® TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan.
NCT02967887
This study is to assess the efficacy and the safety of hepatic arterial infusion of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (HAIC) in advanced HCC patients stratified by biomarker expression predicting therapeutic response.
NCT01009593
The primary objective of this study is to assess the overall survival (OS) of oral linifanib given as monotherapy once daily (QD) compared to sorafenib given twice daily (BID) per standard of care in subjects with advanced or metastatic HCC.