Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-11 of 11 trials
NCT07570537
Enteral access devices (EADs) provide necessary hydration, nutrition, and medications to numerous patients in hospitals across the United States. When patient's EAD becomes clogged it can delay administration of important nutrition and medications which can cause adverse effects such as malnutrition, and dehydration, especially in pediatric patients. Traditional methods of unclogging EADs can require the use of special enzymes or chemicals but these produce a variable rate of success. The TubeClear system has been developed to help alleviate the need for use of special enzymes or chemicals and to provide a quick, safe alternative for those with a clogged or sluggish EAD all while at the patient's bedside. This system prevents the need for subsequent exposure to radiation and contrast media for confirmation of EAD location after replacement.
NCT06712706
Participants were diagnosed with esophageal cancer needing chemo- or radiochemotherapy before the potentially curing surgery consisting of esophagectomy. At the time of diagnosis, in all participants, a laparoscopy to complete staging was performed. In some patients, a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) was placed at the time of staging laparoscopy; in others, the FJT was placed at the time of esophagectomy. A common risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality is sarcopenia, a condition associated with low skeletal muscle. This study aims to determine whether the timing of the FJT placement affects the progress of sarcopenia.
NCT06772285
Test an existing digital health app, called Albert Health, designed to support patients with a newly inserted feeding tube to use and manage their tube care, in a feasibility study. The feasibility study will evaluate the acceptability, usability and accessibility of the app in preparation for a randomised controlled trial.
NCT06525818
The overall objective of this proposal is to test an interdisciplinary intervention to support the transition to oral feeding for children with feeding tubes and tracheostomies. The investigators' model which combines in-home clinical assessments with virtual therapies may maximize the impact of expert interventionists. The investigators' central hypothesis is that children with feeding tubes and tracheostomies will have greater success than a control group when enrolled in a hybrid in-person/virtual intervention including: (1) a coordinated feeding team with an occupational therapist, speech/language pathologist, and registered dietitian; (2) family liaison study coordinators who are poised to support the family through personal experience; (3) a project leader who is a Developmental Behavioral Pediatrician with expertise in children with tracheostomies. The overall objective of this proposal is to test this intervention to increase oral feeding in children with feeding tubes and tracheostomies. To pursue this objective, the investigators propose the following aims: Specific Aim 1: Children enrolled in the intervention group will have improved caregiver self-efficacy and reduced worry related to feeding as determined by The Feeding and Swallowing Impact Survey at the end of a 1-year intervention. Specific Aim 2: Children enrolled in the intervention group will have increased oral vs. tube-fed calories and reduced dependence on feeding tubes as determined by detailed dietary histories and The Children's Eating and Drinking Activity Scale (CEDAS) at the end of a 1-year intervention. The investigators' intervention will determine if a tertiary center of expertise can use a combination of home assessments and virtual interventions to address critical feeding needs for children with tracheostomies. Future clinicians could refer patients to the investigators' center instead of relying on community therapists, who rarely exist. The weekly feeding group sessions as well as the administration of the therapies in a virtual format are research-related. While the therapy techniques implemented during the study are standard of care and within the practice parameters of the practitioners involved, the use of them in a virtual format are novel and should be considered research-related.
NCT06058975
Duodenal injuries remain rare among abdominal trauma, concerning less than 5 % of cases. However, due to its central location, it is most commonly associated with multiple organs lesions, with the main three organs being the liver, the colon and the pancreas. Additionally, the penetrating mechanism is four times more common than blunt trauma and the most common duodenal site of injury is the second portion (36 %), the least being the first duodenum (13 %). These particularities generate a high morbidity, ranging from 22 to 27.1 %, and a mortality still as high as 5.3 to 30 % today. When facing it, surgeons are usually challenged in their strategy. Indeed, when surgery is required, different options can be chosen depending on the grade of the lesion and the involvement of the papilla and/or other organs. Primary repairs, duodenal diverticulization, pyloric exclusion, gastrojejunostomy, retrograde duodenostomy, distal feeding tube, or even resection and Whipple procedures, have all been described. Since the classification of the American Association for the surgery of trauma (AAST), most studies stratified their management as such: drainage only or primary repair for grade 1 and 2, jejunostomy and/or pyloric exclusion for grade 3, Whipple for grade 4 or 5. However, reviews of the literature aren't clear if this decisional tree is in correlation with lower morbidities, and often different procedures have been reported for the same grade. The escalation of technical exclusions among severe grades became controversial. As an example, pyloric exclusion has been criticized in its preventive role of protecting the suture, being useless at least, or even worse at times. Thus, in the recent years, the management has been focused towards minimization. Indeed, in the retrospective review of the Pan-American trauma society primary repair alone was performed in 80 % of cases, all grades comprised. Although mortality was high, duodenal suture line leak was statistically lower among survivors over every grade. To clear the situation, prospective studies are difficult if not impossible in such context. Thus, The investigators propose this national benchmark, to retrospectively review in France the management of duodenal trauma, depending on the grade, and its associated morbidity.
NCT05557396
This methodological research is aimed to examine the effectiveness of the methods used to estimate the internal length of the nasogastric tube and to determine the most reliable method for correct placement of the nasogastric tube in adults. The study will be carried out between 01 September 2022 and 01 September 2023 with 155 patients who hospitalized in the anesthesia and reamination intensive care and general intensive care units of Aydın Adnan Menderes University Application and Research Hospital. The internal tube length measurement methodologies will utilized to confirm proper NGT placement. A total of 5 groups will be included in the study, including 1 control (NEX measurement method) and 4 experimental groups, (Experiment 1: CoNEX measurement method, Experiment 2: XEN+10 cm measurement method, Experiment 3: GWNUF measurement method, Experiment 4: EXU-NE Method measurement method).The "gold standard" reference method will used for comparison was radiography. Research data will be analyzed in SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 25.0 statistical package program. Descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation) will be used in the evaluation of the data. The comparison between the methods used in the measurement of the nasogastric tube (NEX, CoNEX, XEN+10 cm, GWNUF, EXU-NE) and the results of the radiological evaluation (reference method) will be made with Chi-square analysis. Statistical significance will be accepted as p\<0.05.
NCT04621734
A study to compare tube dislodgment rates when a nasoenteric feeding tube is secured with adhesive tape vs the AMT BridlePro device.
NCT05879263
The goal of this clinical trial is to Determine efficacy of intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous enteral nutrition in adults patients with a nasogastric tube in a intensive care unit. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * Reduction of gastrointestinal and respiratory complications * Evaluate the achievement of the caloric objective Informed consent will be requested from participants who meet the inclusion criteria. The participants will be randomized into two groups: control group (continuous enteral nutrition) or experimental group (intermittent enteral nutrition) Researchers will compare intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous to see if there is a reduction in gastrointestinal and respiratory complications.
NCT05694299
Aim of this study is to compare fixation of nasoenteral feeding tubes using either a nasal patch or a nasal bridle in clinical patients with regard to the occurrence of tube dislocation, complications, and discomfort. 78 (2 \* 39) eligible patients will be included in this randomized controlled trial. The study is executed in two general teaching hospitals in the Netherlands (Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn and Medical Spectrum Twente).
NCT04627844
Trauma patients who require Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement for feeding and who consent to be in the study will be randomized to receive feeding at either 6 hours after PEG placement as is routinely done or at 0 hours after PEG placement.
NCT01892267
Our main hypothesis is that self-propelled Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrojejunostomy tube (PEG-J) that has a balloon on it's tip is associated with lower J-tube retrograde migration rate, and lower rates of short- and long-term complications when compared to standard PEGJ feeding tubes.