Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-14 of 14 trials
NCT05440851
PRACTICAL is a randomized multifactorial adaptive platform trial for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). This platform trial will evaluate novel interventions for patients with AHRF across a range of severity states (i.e., not intubated, intubated with lower or higher respiratory system elastance, requiring extracorporeal life support) and across a range of investigational phases (i.e., preliminary mechanistic trials, full-scale clinical trials). AHRF is a common and life-threatening clinical syndrome affecting millions globally every year. Patients with AHRF are at high risk of death and long-term morbidity. Patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation are at risk of ventilator-induced lung injury and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. New treatments and treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes for these very ill patients. Utilizing advances in Bayesian adaptive trial design, the platform will facilitate efficient yet rigorous testing of new treatments for AHRF, with a particular focus on mechanical ventilation strategies and extracorporeal life support techniques as well as pharmacological agents and new medical devices. The platform is designed to enable evaluation of novel interventions at a variety of stages of investigation, including pilot and feasibility trials, trials focused on mechanistic surrogate endpoints for preliminary clinical evaluation, and full-scale clinical trials assessing the impact of interventions on patient-centered outcomes. Interventions will be evaluated within therapeutic domains. A domain is defined as a set of interventions that are intended to act on specific mechanisms of injury using different variations of a common therapeutic strategy. Domains are intended to function independently of each other, allowing independent evaluation of multiple therapies within the same patient. Once feasibility is established, Bayesian adaptive statistical modelling will be used to evaluate treatment efficacy at regular interim adaptive analyses of the pre-specified outcomes for each intervention in each domain. These adaptive analyses will compute the posterior probabilities of superiority, futility, inferiority, or equivalence for pre-specified comparisons within domains. Each of these potential conclusions will be pre-defined prior to commencing the intervention trial. Decisions about trial results (e.g., concluding superiority or equivalence) will be based on pre-specified threshold values for posterior probability. The primary outcome of interest, the definitions for superiority, futility, etc. (i.e., the magnitude of treatment effect) and the threshold values of posterior probability required to reach conclusions for superiority, futility etc., will vary from intervention to intervention depending on the phase of investigation and the nature of the intervention being evaluated. All of these parameters will be pre-specified as part of the statistical design for each intervention trial. In general, domains will be designed to evaluate treatment effect within four discrete clinical states: non-intubated patients, intubated patients with low respiratory system elastance (\<2.5 cm H2O/(mL/kg)), intubated patients with high respiratory system elastance (≥2.5 cm H2O/(mL/kg)), and patients requiring extracorporeal life support. Where appropriate, the model will specify dynamic borrowing between states to maximize statistical information available for trial conclusions. In this perpetual trial design, different interventions may be added or dropped over time. Where possible, the platform will be embedded within existing data collection repositories to enable greater efficiency in outcome ascertainment. Standardized systems for acquiring both physiological and biological measurements are embedded in the platform, to be acquired at sites with appropriate training, expertise, and facilities to collect those measurements.
NCT06750536
This prospective observational study will evaluate the safety and performance of the MiniLung petite kit in neonatal and pediatric patients with acute respiratory and cardiac failure. The main question it aims to answer is (study hypotheses): Veno-venous (VV) and veno-arterial (VA) Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) using the MiniLung petite kit is safe and improves gas exchange (oxygenation and CO2 removal) and hemodynamic stabilization in neonatal and pediatric patients with severe acute respiratory and/or cardiopulmonary failure within 24 hours compared to the treatment before VV or VA ECMO initiation and maintain a life-sustaining condition.
NCT05830721
Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a surgical emergency that can develop in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). ACS is a type of limb ischemia, which means that the limb, such as the arm or leg, loses blood flow. Patients on ECMO can develop this condition for many reasons, but most commonly from the ECMO procedure itself. This most commonly involves the leg. Key symptoms of ACS include severe pain, loss of pulses, loss of feeling, and inability to move the limb. However, because patients on ECMO are often sedated, ACS is difficult to diagnose as patients can not report symptoms. As a result, the only available tool for diagnosing ACS may be measurement of pressures in the limb. This is normally done with a needle-device, which is inserted into the leg for a single measurement. However, a recently developed device, called the MY01 Continuous Compartment Pressure Monitor, allows for continuous pressure readings instead of a single measurement. Multiple measurements may allow for much greater accuracy in diagnosing ACS, which may result in faster time to surgery and potentially save more limbs than single measurements. This device may also be less invasive than an older method of continuous pressure measuring, which uses a needle and tubing that is 14-gauge in size. Therefore, this study aims to compare 3 different types of methods for diagnosing ACS in patients on ECMO, which are 1) Standard of Care, 2) Standard of Care and MY01, and 3)Standard of Care and 14-gauge slit catheter.
NCT06814340
The CALMDOWN trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, comparative, controlled trial randomizing patients who received near apneic ventilation vs usual care on ECMO (ultra-protective lung ventilation). The study goal is to investigate the benefit of early apneic ventilation in the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO. Indeed, our hypothesis is that that early (near) apneic ventilation on venovenous ECMO for severe ARDS can enhance ventilator injury prevention and therefore reduce ECMO duration and mortality at Day 60.
NCT05303363
Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a supportive therapy, indicated in case of severe, possibly reversible pulmonary failure, refractory to conventional therapies. Despite advances, morbidity and mortality remain high. Severe neurological complications can occur during ECMO, but their exact etiology is not well understood. It is hypothesized that fast correction of severe hypercapnia, a common indication for venovenous ECMO, may be detrimental for the brain. The supposed mechanism is that fast correction of hypercapnia may result in massive cerebral vasoconstriction and impaired cerebral blood flow (CBF). In this prospective, observational study the aim is to quantify change in CBF during routine initial correction of severe hypercapnia during VV-ECMO. Furthermore, the investigators will record any other hemodynamic changes during VV-ECMO. The hypothesis is that a larger decline in PaCO2 will result in a larger decline of CBF.
NCT05566665
Nosocomial Infections (NI) are a common and dreadful complication for patients suffering from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). Unfortunately, no study has thoroughly evaluated NI in this fragile patient cohort. Newly developed antibiotics may help manage such infections, but their pharmacokinetics (PK) during ECMO has not been evaluated. Objectives of this prospective observational multicenter pharmacological no-profit study are: 1) describe incidence, microbial etiology, and resistance patterns, and assess risk factors for NIs in a large prospective cohort of ARDS patients undergoing ECMO. 2) provide a PK analysis of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and cefiderocol in adult patients undergoing ECMO Incidence, microbial etiology, and antibiotic resistance patterns of confirmed NIs will be prospectively collected and analyzed. In the subgroup of patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, or cefiderocol as per clinical practice, blood and bronchoalveolar concentration of the antibiotic will be measured, and PK modeling carried out.
NCT02280460
To create a local registry for ECMO patients.
NCT05838937
Investigation of the potential prognostic role of non-invasive myocardial work in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy.
NCT05469139
This study aims to assess the feasibility of assessing acute brain injury using a portable low field MRI in patients on ECMO.
NCT05698628
Peripheral VA-ECMO is widely used in refractory cardiogenic shock patients as a salvage therapy. In most cases, the femoral artery and vein are used for the vascular approach. Large cannulas are usually used for proper oxygenation, which may cause peripheral limb ischemia. Distal perfusion catheterization (DPC) at the ipsilateral arterial cannula site is recommended to prevent distal limb ischemia. However, there is no consensus on the proper timing of DPC and additional invasive procedures may cause complications during VA-ECMO support. In this analysis, the investigators compare the clinical outcomes of distal limb ischemia complications between the conventional DPC group (DPC at the time of limb ischemia sign) and the preemptive DPC group (DPC at the time of VA-ECMO application).
NCT05882474
Excessive respiratory effort may cause self-inflicted lung injury (SILI) and inspiratory muscle injuries , stimulate desynchronization between the patient and ventilator , and worsen the perfusion of extrapulmonary organs . Appropriate respiratory drive and effort should be maintained during the treatment of patients with respiratory failure . In contrast, respiratory drive and effort are commonly increased in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia , and this phenomenon may persist in critically ill patients with COVID-19, even after receiving venovenous ECMO (vv-ECMO) support, owing to low pulmonary compliance and a high systemic inflammatory state . To reduce respiratory effort and drive, ICU physicians often administer high doses of sedative drugs, analgesics, and muscle relaxants. The prolonged use of high doses of these drugs can cause loss of the spontaneous cough reflex, which in turn impairs sputum drainage and eventually worsens pulmonary consolidation and lung infections. As the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) could affect the respiratory drive from the respiratory center (1), it has been shown that altering different levels of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients undergoing ECMO recovering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could alter respiratory drive. We hope to find a more appropriate target for maintaining PaCO2 to control respiratory effort in patients with COVID-19 undergoing ECMO.
NCT05730907
Treatment of refractory cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be augmented with Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to re-establish perfusion in the absence of return of spontaneous circulation. Literature has demonstrated that ECMO initiated during advanced cardiopulmonary life support may confer superior survival rates with acceptable survival and a relatively low incidence of significant neurologic impairment. Levosimendan has not been investigated in patients with cardiac arrest who underwent Extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR). The current study aims to examine whether levosimendan use in the aforementioned patient population could improve survival and ECMO parameters.
NCT04879550
There are publications showing a decrease in Antithrombin III levels of continuous flow and routine heparin therapy in adult patients undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) however, there is not enough data. One of the multifactorial causes affecting bleeding / thrombosis complications and ACT levels may be acquired Antithrombin III deficiency. The Antithrombin III activity test results from the patients to be included in the study during the study will be recorded immediately after ECMO run, at the 24th hour before the heparin infusion start and at the 48th, 72nd and 96th hours following the follow-up. The results will be analyzed to figure out a relationship between decreasing Antithrombin 3 values and thrombotic events.
NCT05306392
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a lesional pulmonary edema that occurs as a result of direct or indirect lung injury. This condition accounts for 10-15% of ICU admissions and 20-25% of patients admitted require invasive ventilation. Its incidence has increased markedly with the Covid-19 epidemic. ARDS is defined as hypoxemia (Pa02/Fi02 \< 300 mmHg) in ventilated patients without heart failure. Currently, the recommendations of the resuscitation societies advocate a management combining invasive ventilation, short duration curarization and prone sessions. In case of failure of these therapies, venovenous ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) is recommended in case of Pa02/Fi02 \< 80 mmHg. Nevertheless, approximately 40% of patients have refractory and persistent hypoxemia despite optimization of ECMO parameters and invasive ventilation. The refractory hypoxemia is defined as Pa02 \< 55 mmHg and/or Sa02 \< 90% and may be due to a recirculation phenomenon or a significant intra-pulmonary shunt. Currently, there is no official recommendation for the management of these patients, leading to the use of various unvalidated field practices. In addition, hospital mortality of the order of 60% is observed in these patients with high management costs. Some data in the literature suggest that induced therapeutic hypothermia (HT) at 34°C for 48 hours could improve the prognosis of these patients by improving oxygenation. Nevertheless, the level of evidence of published studies remains low because they are either case reviews or studies whose methodology does not guarantee the absence of potential bias. The research hypothesis is that HT at 34°C or 33°C for 48 hours is effective on refractory hypoxemia.