Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-7 of 7 trials
NCT06095011
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the UpRight Go posture trainer reduces the symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome in patients who have not had corrective surgery, as determined by improvements in VAS scores for pain, numbness, and weakness.
NCT04322448
The study will be a non-blinded two cohort design consisting only of symptomatic patients with CuTS or compressive peroneal neuropathy or in need of peroneal nerve decompression. The first cohort will be - patients with CuTS. Evaluation of each CuTS patient will include assessment by the treating surgeon and a certified hand therapist. Patients who have clinical examination and history consistent with a diagnosis of CuTS based on subjective and functional assessment outlined below will be consented to this study. The second cohort will be patients in need PND for compressive neuropathy of peroneal nerve. PND patients will be evaluated by clinical exam and have imaging with high resolution ultrasound or MRI negative for mass lesion.
NCT05931731
this study will be conducted to compare between mechanical interference and neural mobilization on ulnar neuropathy post-cubital tunnel syndrome
NCT05332405
Patients with vascular disease, thyroid disease or an allergy to indocyanine green (ICG) will be excluded. Patients with either median or ulnar nerve compression will be treated with nerve decompression. SPY angiography will be used to assess the vascularity of the nerve both pre and post release as the primary outcome measure.
NCT02466841
Compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (cubital tunnel syndrome) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity (carpal tunnel is the most common). Patients who fail conservative treatment (activity modification, splinting, medications) are offered cubital tunnel release. There are multiple techniques to decompress the ulnar nerve at the elbow, but the ideal release has not been determined. These techniques vary from simple decompression of the nerve (in-situ release, endoscopic release), to decompressing the nerve and moving it anteriorly to take tension off the nerve (subcutaneous transposition, sub-fascial transposition, sub muscular transposition), and removing part of the medial epicondyle (medial epicondylectomy). Each procedure has purported benefits and also potential complications. Simple in-situ release has the benefit of shorter operative times and less surgical dissection, however, the nerve may subluxate post-operatively and cause persistent pain. Procedures to move the nerve (subcutaneous transposition, sub-fascial transposition, sub muscular transposition) prevent subluxation and take tension off the nerve, however, they require more dissection, larger incisions, and also partially devascularize the nerve. Medial epicondylectomy prevents subluxation and decompresses the nerve, but some patients may have a prolonged recovery and persistent pain from removing part of the bone. The purpose of this study is to prospective evaluate patients undergoing cubital tunnel release according to the standard practice and preference of their surgeon. The investigators plan to compare the different techniques at standard post-operative intervals.
NCT04647058
Functional motor recovery distal to a peripheral nerve lesion is predicated upon time to reinnervation of the motor end plate and the number of regenerate axons that reach the target. Supercharged end-to-side (SETS) transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve to the motor fascicle of the ulnar nerve at the level of the distal forearm has been proposed as an adjunct procedure in severe cubital tunnel syndrome to augment motor recovery of the ulnar-innervated intrinsic muscles. Multiple Level IV Therapeutic studies and a systematic review of Level IV Therapeutic studies have reported favorable clinical and electrodiagnostic outcomes following SETS for cubital tunnel syndrome, with low rates of complications. However, in the absence of controls, it remains unclear what proportion of the observed intrinsic motor recovery is attributable to the SETS procedure. The objective of this randomized trial is to compare the results of ulnar nerve decompression with or without SETS for severe cubital tunnel syndrome.
NCT01781494
The goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that immediate elbow motion is safe after anterior submuscular ulnar nerve transposition, and will not result in disruption of the repaired flexor pronator origin, under which the nerve is placed. The advantages of immediate elbow motion after submuscular ulnar nerve transposition for performing activities of daily living and self-care are evident, however theoretical advantages include early "gliding" of the transposed ulnar nerve with a lower risk of nerve adhesions and subsequent traction neuritis, as well as improved blood flow and quicker, more complete, recovery of nerve function. A group of 44 consecutive patients that are determined to be candidates for anterior submuscular ulnar nerve transposition based on history, positive findings on physical examination, and confirmatory electrodiagnostic testing will be prospectively randomized to either immediate motion or long arm cast immobilization after surgery. All patients will be counseled about the two postoperative treatment options (immobilization followed by protected range of motion versus immediate range of motion), risks involved with each treatment protocol, postoperative follow-up and need for radiographs. If they choose not to participate, they will be treated by the same postoperative protocol currently used by the principal investigator: arm sling at rest for six weeks with intermittent active assisted range of motion exercises.