Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-7 of 7 trials
NCT07290322
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate denture retention in intra-orally scanned versus extra-orally scanned digitally printed maxillary dentures in completely edentulous patients. The main question is : 1. Do intra-orally scanned dentures provide better retention compared to extra-orally scanned dentures? Researchers will compare the intra-orally scanned denture group to the extraorally scanned denture group to determine if one method leads to superior retention records. Participants will: • Receive both types of dentures (intra-orally scanned and extra-orally scanned), with a three-week wash-out period between each intervention. The study aims to provide evidence on the optimal scanning method for digitally printed maxillary dentures in edentulous patients.
NCT05464914
In the first part, after a brief introduction, the advantages and disadvantages of immediate dentures are compared. There is a detailed discussion on assessment and treatment planning which includes history taking, examination of the soft and hard tissues, current prostheses, occlusion as well as discussion on investigations required and formulating a diagnosis. The first part ends with a summary of types of immediate dentures and denture designs.
NCT05972538
A Total number of 36 implants were installed in 6 patients having mandibular single denture. The patients were divided into two groups according to the definitive prosthesis. Group I received ball and socket retained mandibular implant overdenture while Group II received cement retained implant supported fixed bridges.
NCT04999579
Bite testing using T-Scan allows the evaluation of occlusal contacts prior to making a bite adjustment. The T-Scan can indicate premature contact and the load distribution on teeth, and provide measurable force and time information that ensures proper occlusal adjustment.
NCT03048812
Dental implants are often the preferred treatment option and in some clinical scenarios they are considered the standard of care to restore missing or damaged teeth, due to the limitations of conventional treatments. For fully edentulous subjects, conventional tissue-supported dentures in some cases are associated with severe subjective complaints and difficult adaptation, mainly the mandibular denture, resulting in limited function and detrimental effects on oral health-related quality of life, especially for older patients. The use of implants to retain a mandibular denture (overdenture) has been recommended as a suitable and low-cost alternative to improve denture stability, with positive effects on oral comfort and function. The two-implant mandibular overdenture has been considered an effective design to achieve clinical benefits for patients. However, the main problem facing two-implant overdenture is the high cost of implantation and the relative complexity of the surgical intervention, so the use of a single midline implant to retain a mandibular overdenture was suggested as a more viable solution for reducing costs and complexity of treatment with similar benefits compared to solutions with higher number of implants. Nevertheless, there are few studies that compared the performance of different retention systems and their effects on patient-centered outcomes, such as satisfaction with the dentures, oral health-related quality of life, individual preferences and other subjective ratings of clinical outcomes. Thus, the aim of this randomized clinical trial with a crossover design is to investigate the changes in clinical and patient-reported outcomes following the use of different retention systems for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture Hypothesis: it was hypothesized that clinical and patient-reported outcomes of a single-implant mandibular overdenture is dependent on the type of retention system, and patients have distinct preferences in relation to different attachments
NCT03326453
The better form of ridge will provide using wider implants that can have better abilities to with stand forces and to prevent alveolar bone loss as much as possible. Ridge expansion gained some popularity due to easiness compared to any other procedure that can gain bone. However, this treatment modality needs to be evaluated as compared to Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) over denture in thin mandibular ridge. In mandibular edentulous patients having thin ridge, does the mini implant supported over denture, compared to the conventional implant supported over denture after bone expansion affect bone height around implants?
NCT02180230
The aim of this study was to evaluate the 7 mm long implants NobelSpeedy Shorty and Brånemark System Mk III Shorty: by determining the marginal bone remodeling, implant survival rate, soft tissue health and maintenance.