Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-9 of 9 trials
NCT06773832
Background: Colonoscopy with optical diagnosis based on the appearance of polyps can guide the selection of endoscopic treatment methods, reduce unnecessary polypectomy procedures and the need for tissue pathological diagnosis, and formulate follow-up strategies in a timely manner \[1\]. This approach significantly alleviates the economic burden on patients and the healthcare system and can effectively ease the tension on clinical resources \[2\]. Various endoscopic polyp classification methods, including Pit Pattern \[3\], NICE \[4\], WASP \[5\], and MS \[6\], are used to determine pathological types. However, mastering these classification methods requires endoscopists to undergo extensive training, and due to the inherent flaws in each method, no single endoscopic classification method can accurately diagnose all types of polyps to meet the requirements of optical diagnosis. This limitation has hindered the widespread application of optical diagnosis in clinical practice \[7\]. The application of artificial intelligence technology in this field, known as computer-aided diagnosis (CADx), has seen rapid development in recent years. Numerous large-scale, prospective studies have demonstrated that the accuracy of CADx technology for optical diagnosis of minute lesions (\<5mm) has essentially met the threshold set by European and American endoscopy societies for optical diagnosis \[8,9\]. However, the diagnostic efficacy of CADx for polyps ≥5mm remains unclear. Moreover, current research is mostly limited to distinguishing between common adenomas and hyperplastic polyps, with little attention given to serrated lesions, which are also precancerous lesions and progress even more rapidly, and are more challenging for endoscopists to assess. These reasons prevent CADx from being widely applied in clinical practice for real-time accurate judgment of polyp pathological types.
NCT06097637
Endoscopic resection of pedunculated polyps mainly focuses on how to prevent bleeding, and also needs to pay attention to the convenience of resection and the integrity of resection, which means that different endoscopic resection strategies should be adopted for pedunculated polyps with different pedicle sizes. The head larger than 20mm or pedicle larger than 5mm are defined as large pedunculated polyps, which are at greater risk of bleeding. Current guidelines recommend hot removal by snare following preoperative saline injection, ligation of the pedicle with a nylon ring or metal clip, depending on the size of the polyp head and pedicle. However, the use of snares and metal clamps does not appear to reduce delayed postoperative bleeding, and the technical requirements of nylon ligation are relatively high. Recent studies have found that Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is also safe and effective for the treatment of large and medium colorectal sessile polyps. Therefore, it is still necessary to further explore new safe and effective endoscopic resection strategies and techniques.
NCT04727918
European guidelines recommend the use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCP)(5 mm or less). However, for DCP \< 4 mm cold biopsy forceps (CBF) may be optional. Moreover, CBF remains the endoscopist's technique of choice for polyp resection and CSP is associated with a failure of specimen retrieval for histology in up to 6.8% of cases. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the efficacy of CSP with CBF for removal of DCP in routine colonoscopy
NCT00725465
The purpose of this study is to evaluate prospectively the usefulness of IC-CO2(intraoperative colonoscopy (IC) using carbon dioxide (CO2)) in colon and rectal surgical practice, coincident with laparoscopic surgery, and assess whether it provides useful information that influences the type of surgical therapy intended. Investigators will further define the safety and extent of bowel distension when using IC-CO2.
NCT02354287
There is no consensus method for removal of diminutive (5mm) to small(6-9mm) colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. Neither the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy or the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have guidelines for the removal of these polyps, despite the fact that around 90% of lesions removed by polypectomy at colonoscopy are diminutive to small. Multiple techniques are used for polyp removal, especially diminutive lesions. These include either forceps, both hot and cold, as well as snare with electrocautery or cold snare. Forceps utilises shearing force to grasp tissue and remove it, with the hot method passing a current through the grasper to essentially burn tissue. Snare is the use of a small metal loop placed and tightened at the base of polyps to cut through the tissue either straight away in a cold method or with electrocautery where a small current is passed through the loop to assist cutting through tissue. Surveys of Colonoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Australia and the United States show that the choice of method used for diminutive to small polyps is highly variable with cold snaring marginally favoured.Studies into polypectomy techniques are limited and it is clear that additional data and the review of polypectomy methods needs to be undertaken in order determine the optimal method for the removal of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. A technique is used at the Gloucestershire National Health Service (NHS) trust involving a submucosal pre injection with a standard solution then the use of cold forceps for removal of polyps ≤7mm. This appears to be both very safe and highly effective method for the removal of these lesions compared to other techniques. No formal published studies have been completed to evaluate this method at national and international levels. We propose a study to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and costs of this method.
NCT01112514
Standard white light endoscopy involves the passage of a thin, flexible camera into the colon from the anus. Although standard white light endoscopy can detect most polyps and precancerous areas in the gastrointestinal tract and colon, many studies have shown that even the most experienced doctors, under optimal conditions, can miss up to 15-25% of precancerous areas. Thus, there remains a clear need to develop new methods of improving standard white light endoscopy. We are investigating whether indocyanine green (ICG) can serve to highlight areas which are precancerous when the colon is visualized with a special cameral which shines fluorescent light. Information from other studies suggests that this ICG agent may help to visualize blood vessels flowing to precancerous areas in the colon. We are looking at the ability of ICG, in combination with an endoscope which shines fluorescent light, to visualize precancerous areas in the colon.
NCT01607827
The investigators aim to assess the procedure time and miss rate of polyps when performing polypectomy in the colon on the way up\* and down\*\* or only on the way down\*\*. (\* advancing the scope to the cecum, \*\* pulling back the scope after intubation of the cecum). Our hypothesis is that using the strategy to remove all visible polyps firstly on the way up and secondly on the way down is less time consuming and misses less polyps as with the strategy to remove polyps only on the way down.
NCT01262248
Recent studies have shown that narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a powerful diagnostic tool for the differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps. The aim of the present study is to develop and evaluate a computer-based method for automated classification of small colorectal polyps on the basis of vascularization features.In a prospective study 207 polyps with a size of 10mm or smaller should be detected by a zoom NBI colonoscopy. These polyps were imaged and subsequently removed for histological analysis. the polyp images were analyzed by a computer algorithm. The proposed computer-based method consists of several steps: preprocessing, vessel segmentation, feature extraction and classification. The results of the automatic classification (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy)were compared to those of human observers, who were blinded to the histological gold standard.
NCT00988676
High quality bowel cleaning preparation was most important prerequisites of a accurate colonoscopy, because even a small amount of residual fecal matter can obscure small polyps and increase unnecessary procedure time. Until now, several studies evaluated the impact of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy using comparison of the polyp detection rate in patients with adequate bowel preparation status to that in patients with inadequate bowel preparation status during colonoscopy. However, there was no direct measurement the effect bowel preparation status on the polyp missing rate, the quality of colonoscopy, using tandem colonoscopic evaluation in prospective setting.