Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 434 trials
NCT07287098
This study will include two groups of patients: Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. Cohort 1: will help researchers learn how a medicine called imlunestrant (LY3484356) affects a specific type of breast cancer. Some patients will take both imlunestrant and another treatment to suppress their ovarian function. Some will take it without ovarian suppression. Researchers will compare the effects in breast cancer cells to those of another medicine called tamoxifen. All patients in this group will be premenopausal women who have a type of early breast cancer called estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative. The treatment in this group will last for up to 29 days. Cohort 2: will help researchers understand how imlunestrant affects the ovaries when it is taken without ovarian suppression. Researchers will compare the effects to those of another medicine called tamoxifen. This group will also include premenopausal women with the same type of breast cancer. The treatment in this group will last for up to 6 months.
NCT07222215
The goal of this research study is to compare a combination of two drugs, capecitabine and elacestrant to capecitabine alone as a treatment for advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. This study is designed for participants with cancer that has previously stopped responding to medication in the class of therapy called CDK 4/6 inhibitors, including palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclb. The names of the study drugs involved in this study are: * Elacestrant (a type of selective estrogen receptor degrader) * Capecitabine (a type of fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite)
NCT07230535
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) preserves the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and is associated with improved cosmetic outcomes, body image, and patient satisfaction compared with more ablative techniques. Its use has expanded in both therapeutic and risk-reducing settings, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early-stage invasive breast cancer, where the NAC is not clinically or radiologically involved. Multiple observational and cohort studies support the oncological safety of NSM in appropriately selected patients, provided meticulous surgical technique and pathological assessment are employed to minimise the risk of residual disease. Robotic-assisted NSM has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional open techniques. Robotic platforms offer enhanced three-dimensional visualisation, improved instrument articulation, and ergonomic advantages that may facilitate precise dissection while reducing surgeon fatigue. Single-port robotic systems enable NSM to be performed through a single axillary incision, potentially reducing visible scarring and postoperative discomfort while maintaining oncological principles. Early series from high-volume centres have demonstrated the technical feasibility and short-term safety of robotic NSM, with outcomes broadly comparable to open NSM and signals of potential aesthetic benefit. However, these data are largely non-randomised and derived from single-centre experiences. Despite the increasing adoption of both conventional and robotic NSM, there remains a paucity of high-quality prospective evidence evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Validated instruments such as the Breast-Q, Hopwood Body Image Scale, and Aesthetic Item Scale (AIS) provide robust measures of patient satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and aesthetic outcome, yet randomised comparisons of robotic versus open NSM using these tools are lacking. In particular, there is limited evidence examining whether the proposed cosmetic and experiential advantages of robotic surgery translate into meaningful improvements in PROs across different reconstructive pathways. Breast reconstruction is a critical determinant of postoperative quality of life following mastectomy. Both implant-based reconstruction and autologous reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are established techniques, each with distinct risk profiles, recovery trajectories, and long-term outcomes. Autologous DIEP reconstruction is associated with superior long-term satisfaction and physical well-being in many patients, while implant-based reconstruction remains the most commonly performed approach nationally. Evaluating NSM techniques across both reconstructive modalities enhances the generalisability and clinical relevance of trial findings. The REBORN Network Trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled study conducted within an Irish cancer network using a hub-and-spoke model for robotic surgery delivery. Patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction are stratified by reconstruction type (implant-based or DIEP flap) and randomised to receive either robotic-assisted or conventional open NSM. Robotic procedures are centralised within a designated surgical hub, while open procedures are delivered either locally or centrally, depending on reconstructive requirements. This design enables equitable access to robotic surgery while maintaining oncological safety and surgical expertise. By comparing robotic-assisted and open NSM within both implant and DIEP reconstruction cohorts using validated PRO measures, this study aims to determine whether robotic technology confers measurable benefits in patient satisfaction, body image, and aesthetic outcome. The findings will inform patient counselling, surgical decision-making, and future service development within networked breast cancer care systems.
NCT07591506
This prospective randomized clinical study evaluates the role of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. The study aims to determine whether frozen section assessment during surgery improves intraoperative decision-making and affects surgical management when compared with standard final pathological evaluation performed after surgery.
NCT04251533
The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment with alpelisib in combination with nab-paclitaxel is safe and effective in subjects with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) who carry either a PIK3CA mutation (Study Part A) or have PTEN loss (Study Part B1) or PTEN loss without PIK3CA mutation (Study Part B2)
NCT06380816
This clinical trial is looking at UCB4594. This is the first time the drug is being tested in humans. UCB4594 is a type of drug called a monoclonal antibody. It has been designed to work by targeting a protein called human leucocyte antigen G (HLA-G) that is found in high levels on some cancer cells. By attaching itself to this protein it may help the immune system to attack and kill the cancer cells. The four main aims of the clinical trial are to find out: 1. The best dose of UCB4594 that can be given safely to participants in the trial. 2. What the side effects of UCB4594 are and how they can be managed. 3. What happens to UCB4594 inside the body and how it affects cancer cells. 4. Whether UCB4594 can cause cancer to shrink.
NCT07541859
This quasi-experimental study aims to determine whether a breast and cervical cancer awareness training program can increase participation in cancer screening among women with visual impairments. The study also aims to identify barriers to screening and improve knowledge about cancer risk factors and screening methods. The main questions this study will address are: * Does the training increase the rate at which women with visual impairments attend cancer screening appointments? * Does the training improve participants' knowledge about breast and cervical cancer? Participants will: * Receive training on breast and cervical cancer risk factors and screening methods. * Learn how to apply to the Cancer Early Diagnosis, Screening, and Training Center. * Be encouraged to attend cancer screening during the study period. * Have knowledge and screening status assessed before the training, immediately after, and three months later.
NCT06608446
The most common complaints after breast surgery are postoperative pain reported in up to 68% of patients, musculoskeletal problems in the shoulder and functional limitations in up to 59% of patients after mastectomy and quadrantectomy, reduction in range of motion ( ROM) in 24-53% and strength deficit. The study aims to verify the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation treatment in terms of prevention of possible complications following breast cancer surgery. Primary objective: to examine whether the group of patients undergoing rehabilitation surgery in the immediate post-operative period shows a reduction in the onset of complications compared to the group of patients who followed standard procedures. Secondary objective: to study any preoperative prognostic factors for the onset of complications, to study the effectiveness of the rehabilitation treatment in terms of reduction of painful symptoms, improvement of joint ROM, muscle strength and perceived quality of life.
NCT04389632
This trial will look at a drug called sigvotatug vedotin (SGN-B6A) alone and with pembrolizumab, with or without chemotherapy, to find out whether it is safe for people who have solid tumors. It will study sigvotatug vedotin to find out what its side effects are. A side effect is anything the drug does besides treating cancer. It will also study whether sigvotatug vedotin works to treat solid tumors. The study will have four parts. * Part A of the study will find out how much sigvotatug vedotin should be given to participants. * Part B will use the dose found in Part A to find out how safe sigvotatug vedotin is and if it works to treat solid tumors. * Part C of the study will find out how safe sigvotatug vedotin is in combination with these other drugs. * Part D will include people who have not received treatment. This part of the study will find out how safe sigvotatug vedotin is in combination with these other drugs and if these combinations work to treat solid tumors. * In Parts C and D, participants will receive sigvotatug vedotin with either: * Pembrolizumab or, * Pembrolizumab and carboplatin, or * Pembrolizumab and cisplatin.
NCT06966700
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat types of breast cancer that are both: * High-risk, which means the cancer may have a higher chance of getting worse or coming back after treatment * Early-stage, which means the cancer is in the breast or the lymph nodes around the breast The 2 types of breast cancer in this study are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-low positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer. These cancers have zero or a low amount of a protein called HER2 and other proteins that attach to the hormones estrogen or progesterone. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (also known as sac-TMT or MK-2870), the study medicine, is a type of targeted therapy. A targeted therapy is a treatment that works to control how specific types of cancer cells grow and spread. The main goals of this study are to learn if people who receive sac-TMT, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy: * Have fewer cancer cells found in the tumors and lymph nodes removed during surgery compared to those who receive only pembrolizumab and chemotherapy * Live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back compared to people who receive only pembrolizumab with chemotherapy
NCT07174336
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of Tersolisib (LY4064809/STX-478) to other anti-cancer drugs as first treatment for advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Participants can remain in the study as long as the drug is helping the cancer without unbearable side effects.
NCT04895709
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose(s) of BMS-986340 as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab or docetaxel in participants with advanced solid tumors. This study is a first-in-human (FIH) study of BMS-986340 in participants with advanced solid tumors.
NCT05180474
The purpose of this trial is to measure the following in participants with solid tumors who receive GEN1047: * The side effects seen with GEN1047 * What the body does with GEN1047 once it is administered * What GEN1047 does to the body once it is administered * How well GEN1047 works against solid tumors The estimated trial duration for an individual participant is 8 months, consisting of a 28-day screening period, an estimated 3 month treatment period (the duration of treatment may vary for each participant), and an estimated 4 month post-treatment follow-up period (the duration of follow-up may vary for each participant). All participants will receive active drug; no one will be given placebo.
NCT05386108
This is a multi-site, global, open-label study that includes a phase 1b evaluation of elacestrant in combination with abemaciclib in women and men with brain metastases from estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) negative breast cancer. Phase 1b was designed to select the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and is followed by an ongoing phase 2 evaluation of elacestrant in combination with abemaciclib in participants with active brain metastases from ER-positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer.
NCT07264998
Why is this study being done? Many patients with a type of breast cancer (called HR-positive) take a medicine called Abemaciclib. While this medicine is effective, a very common side effect is diarrhea, which can be severe enough to disrupt treatment and reduce quality of life. The reason why some patients get diarrhea and others do not is not well understood. This study aims to investigate whether the natural bacteria living in the gut (known as the gut microbiome) play a role in this side effect. Researchers will compare the gut bacteria of patients who develop diarrhea with those who do not. What will happen in the study? This is an observational study, which means that patients will receive their normal cancer treatment and will not be given any new or experimental drugs as part of this initial phase. * Patients who are already being treated with Abemaciclib will be invited to join. * They will be placed into one of two groups: those who experience diarrhea and those who do not. * Participants will be asked to provide stool (feces) samples and may also provide optional blood samples at specific times during their treatment. * Researchers will analyze these samples in the lab to study the types and functions of the gut bacteria. Who can participate? * Adult women (aged 18-75) diagnosed with HR-positive breast cancer. * Currently receiving treatment with Abemaciclib for at least 2 weeks. * Must be willing to provide informed consent and follow the study procedures. What are the potential benefits? Participants will not receive any direct medical benefit from taking part in this study. However, the information learned may help researchers better understand why diarrhea occurs and, in the future, could lead to new ways to prevent or treat this side effect for other cancer patients. How is privacy protected? All personal information and samples collected will be de-identified using a unique code. This means that the data used for analysis cannot be directly linked back to the participant's identity. All data is stored securely according to strict ethical guidelines.
NCT07491055
Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally. Timely and accurate detection is crucial for improving prognosis and survival outcomes. While digital mammography has long served as the gold standard for screening, it is limited by overlapping tissue structures, particularly in women with dense breasts, which can obscure malignancies or create false positives. To address these limitations, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), especially wide-angle DBT, has been developed to offer three-dimensional imaging and reduce tissue overlap. Siemens' MAMMOMAT B.brilliant system, which incorporates wide-angle DBT, enhances spatial resolution and improves lesion conspicuity. This technology may offer significant benefits in diagnostic populations, where accuracy and confidence in imaging interpretation are crucial. In parallel, artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as the Transpara system have been introduced to further improve mammographic interpretation. Previously the evaluation of Transpara in a sample of 310 Japanese women and found that while human readers outperformed AI in overall diagnostic performance, the system showed promising sensitivity levels, highlighting the potential of AI as a decision-support tool rather than a standalone reader. More robust evidence is provided by the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence (MASAI) trial, which assessed AI-supported screen reading in a controlled study of over 80,000 women. The trial found that AI-supported reading led to a comparable cancer detection rate as standard double reading (6.1 vs. 5.1 per 1000 participants) but reduced reading workload by 44.3% without increasing false positives or recall rates. A related analysis by the same team emphasized the capability of AI to triage exams effectively and highlighted that AI-flagged "extra high risk" mammograms accounted for a substantial portion (over 55%) of all screen-detected cancers, with a high positive predictive value. Despite these encouraging findings, most studies have been limited to screening-based settings. There remains a lack of prospective evidence on the real-world diagnostic application of wide-angle DBT and AI in populations at higher risk, such as symptomatic patients or those recalled from screening. This represents a critical knowledge gap, especially given increasing concerns about radiologist workload and diagnostic delays. The purpose of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the integration and diagnostic value of wide-angle tomosynthesis and AI (Transpara) in a clinical diagnostic setting. Specifically, it aims to assess their influence on radiologist confidence, diagnostic accuracy and the need for supplementary imaging. By addressing these questions, the study seeks to inform future implementation strategies that balance accuracy, efficiency, and clinical utility.
NCT07191730
Cancer treatments have improved substantially over the past decades, but some effective therapies such as anthracyclines and HER2-targeted agents are associated with severe cardiovascular adverse effects, including heart failure. Existing cardiovascular risk prediction scores have limited evidence in this setting. The ML-CardioTox study is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort conducted in 15 centers in France. The primary objective is to develop a one-year prediction score for cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity using machine learning methods. A dedicated software platform will be used to standardize data collection and support integration of artificial intelligence tools. A total of 600 patients treated with anthracyclines or HER2-targeted therapies in cardio-oncology clinics will be enrolled over a one-year inclusion period starting in December 2024, with a 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of cardiotoxicity as defined by the 2022 European Society of Cardiology guidelines (hospitalization for heart failure, initiation or escalation of diuretic therapy, decline in cardiac function on imaging, or increase in cardiac biomarkers such as troponin or natriuretic peptides). Secondary objectives include comparison of the predictive performance of the machine learning-derived score with the established HFA-ICOS risk score. Patients will be managed according to routine clinical practice. This study aims to improve prognostic stratification tools for patients receiving anthracyclines or HER2-targeted therapies, with the goal of better identifying those at high risk of developing cardiotoxicity during follow-up.
NCT07038369
This is a Phase 1, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ATV-1601 administered orally in adults with AKT1 E17K-mutant, advanced solid tumors and also in HR+/HER2- advanced and metastatic breast cancer, with or without fulvestrant.
NCT06312176
The purpose of this study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan as a single agent, and in combination with pembrolizumab, versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in participants with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic, breast cancer. The primary hypotheses are that sacituzumab tirumotecan as a single agent and sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab are superior to TPC with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in all participants.
NCT06797635
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR) low positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer. The main goals of this study are to learn: * About the safety of the study treatments and if people tolerate them * If people who receive patritumab deruxtecan, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy before surgery have fewer cancer cells removed during surgery compared to those who receive only pembrolizumab (pembro) and chemotherapy.