Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-10 of 10 trials
NCT07111000
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the Epley maneuver versus a sham maneuver in treating patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with BPPV. The main questions that the study aims to answer are: * What is the mean difference in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores between patients receiving the Epley maneuver and those receiving the sham maneuver 3 days after enrollment? * What is the immediate response (using a 0-10-point Likert scale) of patients in each arm of the study? * What is the proportion of patients who, despite agreeing to participate, were unable to complete the full Epley maneuver due to symptom severity? Researchers will compare the Epley maneuver arm to the sham maneuver arm to see if the Epley maneuver is more effective in reducing BPPV symptoms. Participants will: * Undergo either the Epley maneuver or a sham maneuver. * Complete the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire at baseline and 3 days post-discharge. * Patients with insufficient improvement in the sham maneuver group will receive a rescue Epley maneuver. * Have their vertigo severity assessed using a 0-10 point Likert scale at baseline, immediately and post-maneuver.
NCT07075289
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 works better than betahistine mesylate on inflammation, quality of life, and dizziness symptoms of adult benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) patients. It will also learn about the safety of oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 as a causative therapy of BPPV. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is there a difference in the decrease in IL-1β levels between BPPV patients who receive oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 therapy and patients who receive betahistine mesylate therapy? * Is there a difference in the decrease in TNF-α levels between BPPV patients who receive oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 therapy and patients who receive betahistine mesylate therapy? * Is there a difference in the decrease in VCAM-1 levels between BPPV patients who receive oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 therapy and patients who receive betahistine mesylate therapy? * Is there a difference in the quality of life between BPPV patients who receive oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 therapy and patients who receive betahistine mesylate therapy? * Is there a difference in the time to improve dizziness symptoms between BPPV patients who receive oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 therapy and patients who receive betahistine mesylate therapy? Researchers will compare oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 to betahistine mesylate to see if oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 works better to treat BPPV Participants will: * Join a brief interview to find out the current and past medical history, as well as a physical examination of the study participants * Give blood samples for biomarker examination, which will be conducted at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of Dr. Moewardi Surakarta Hospital * Take oral lumbrokinase DLBS1033 or betahistine mesylate every day for 2 weeks * Visit the clinic once every week for evaluation and the blood test * Keep a diary of their symptoms
NCT06725966
Background: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo, often effectively treated with standard canalith repositioning maneuvers (CRMs). However, approximately 12.5% of cases remain refractory, leading to persistent symptoms and increased healthcare burden. Variations in the anatomical orientation of the semicircular canals (SCCs) may explain the resistance to conventional maneuvers. This study explores a personalized medicine approach, utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on MRI reconstructions to tailor CRMs with the help of mechanical rotation chair according to individual inner ear anatomy. Methods: The investigators conducted a randomized, multicenter, open-label study targeting patients with refractory posterior canal BPPV. Participants were allocated to either a control group (receiving repeated standard CRMs and Brandt-Daroff exercises) or an intervention group (receiving personalized CRMs based on CFD simulations derived from MRI scans). The intervention group's maneuvers were executed using a mechanical rotational chair designed for precise angulation. Primary outcomes included resolution of nystagmus and vertigo symptoms, while secondary outcomes measured the reduction in healthcare visits and improved quality of life (Dizziness Handicap Inventory score).
NCT06314581
Acute vertigo accounts for around 4% of emergency room visits. Triggered episodic vestibular syndrome is the most commonly encountered symptomatic context. BPPV (Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo) is the main cause, representing 40-50% of the vertigo cases assessed in emergency departments. It results from the migration of calcium carbonate particles (otoliths), from the sticky membrane of the utricle and saccule of the inner ear, to one of the 3 semicircular canals (SCC), posterior, horizontal or lateral, and anterior. It occurs idiopathically with head movement, through degeneration, or following head trauma. The otolith impulse causes the endolymph to move, temporarily and aberrantly displacing the cup of the affected canal, resulting in the transmission of erroneous information to the vestibular nuclei. This leads to the sudden onset of vertigo and eye deviation, resulting in transient nystagmus. The location of the displaced otoliths determines the variant of BPPV: BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal is the most common (around 65% of BPPVs), followed by BPPV of the horizontal canal, while BPPV of the anterior canal is rare, as it resolves spontaneously and rapidly. Although a benign condition, BPPV leads 9 times out of 10 to a medical consultation, interruption of daily activities, or sick leave. Untreated, it will usually recur, and can impact on patients' quality of life.
NCT05352555
Comparison of treatment efficacy of an automated robotic maneuvering system (RMS) repositioning chair versus manual positioning maneuvers in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.
NCT04935970
The purpose of investigation is to assess the levels of metabolic factors (hydroxyvitamin D, homocysteine) between patients with vestibular dysfunction of peripheral origin (BPPV) and central origin (vestibular migraine). Also we will analyse another factors (such as anxiety and depression) and optimize therapeuthical approach accordingly with the data.
NCT04715282
Observation of the effects of Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises applied after the Epley maneuver on balance, vertigo symptoms, and quality of life in BPPV patients.
NCT03161470
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common inner ear cause of dizziness. It has been reported that up to 900 of every 10,000 people in the United States experience this problem with an estimated annual healthcare cost approaching $2 Billion. This problem occurs when calcium carbonate "crystals" which are present and needed in one part of the balance area of the inner ear become displaced to a different part of the balance area. This is very disruptive to the function of the inner ear and results primarily in intense vertigo. Nausea,imbalance, and falls can also occur. The accepted course of management for BPPV is the use of "repositioning maneuvers" which are completed by moving patients through specific head/body positions that literally reposition the displaced crystals out of the wrong area. These treatment methods are reported to be effective for about 80% of patients after one-to-three treatments. For the remaining 20% of patients, more treatments may be necessary and for a small percentage of patients surgical options may be the only cure. Additionally, some patients with BPPV are not able to physically move into the needed positions because of hip and neck problems, spinal problems, obesity, other mobility limitations, etc. Within the past decade, a motorized chair was developed to help reposition any patient with BPPV. There have been no reported adverse incidents with the motorized chair but the device was quite expensive so it was only available at a handful of clinical sites. At this time the motorized chair is no longer being manufactured. More recently, a mechanical chair was developed and has been in use in Europe and China. The mechanical chair has all the advantages of the motorized chair but with a lesser cost. The inventor of the mechanical chair has also developed some slight variations on treatment technique that may have the potential to improve treatment efficacy. We are privileged to have the only mechanical chair of this type in the United States. The primary purpose of the current project is to systematically investigate the treatment efficacy of this mechanical chair for patients with BPPV. We will compare treatment outcomes for patients diagnosed with BPPV using standard methods, the mechanical chair, and a sham condition also using the mechanical chair. A secondary purpose is to determine treatment efficacy for patients with covert BPPV. We will simply measure if treatment with the mechanical chair has any effect on patient symptoms. If we determine treatment is improved with the mechanical chair then it may be possible to help a greater number of patients with BPPV with fewer treatments.
NCT02809599
The study evaluates a theory-based educational intervention and implementation strategy on the use of the Dix-Hallpike test (DHT) and Canalith Repositioning Maneuver (CRM) in a community Emergency Department (ED) setting. The DHT and CRM are used to diagnose and treat Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV).
NCT01905800
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) represents the most common cause of labyrinthine vertigo with a lifetime prevalence of 2.4 percent. Onset is most common between the fifth and seventh decades of life. The disease can be a major handicap for the affected patient, and causes a great expense for society. The traditional manual treatment with repositioning maneuvers has greatly improved the possibilities for treatment of BPPV the last decade. However some patients are still difficult to diagnose and treat, and there are some who for health reasons cannot undergo traditional manual treatment. In this perspective there is a demand for a reliable, effective and precise method to treat all semicircular canals for the differentiated patient groups, and the techniques are under continuous development.