Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-5 of 5 trials
NCT07360366
This study evaluates the impact of a structured interprofessional training program on daily collaboration within the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU/UTIC) at the University Hospital of Parma. In high-intensity clinical settings, rapid and accurate coordination between physicians, nurses, and healthcare assistants is vital. Ineffective teamwork often leads to communication breakdowns, potentially compromising patient safety and care quality. This project investigates whether an interactive, scenario-based educational program can strengthen role clarity, communication, and shared decision-making. The study seeks to determine if an active-learning program using interactive branching scenarios improves interprofessional collaboration more effectively than traditional methods. The researchers hypothesize that this simulation-based approach will significantly enhance professional outcomes, including self-efficacy, shared decision-making, and commitment to both the team and the profession. The study utilizes a convenience sample (approx. 5 physicians, 30 nurses, 8 healthcare assistants, and 10 students). Eligible participants include staff and students currently or recently active in the Parma CICU who provide informed consent. The intervention is delivered via a Moodle-based platform featuring case-based simulations. These scenarios replicate complex clinical pathways, such as: Cath-lab and Electrophysiology procedures. Heart failure management. TAVI (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) preparation. As participants navigate these scenarios, they must make critical decisions and receive immediate feedback designed to reinforce collaborative best practices. Data Collection and Timeline Data is gathered at three intervals: T0 (Baseline), T1 (Post-training), and T2 (6-month follow-up). Validated questionnaires measure: Attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration. Perceived daily collaboration and decision-making satisfaction. Professional commitment and work-related self-efficacy. The training phase spans six months, with a subsequent six-month follow-up, totaling a 24-month project duration. Ethics and Privacy Risks are minimal, primarily involving the time required for participation. The primary benefit is the development of skills that foster safer, more coordinated patient care. Privacy is strictly maintained through pseudo-anonymization, with data access restricted to the research team.
NCT07296380
The aim of this study is to develop a scale to assess the manual therapy application behaviors of physiotherapists in Türkiye, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991). A literature-based item pool will be created, and expert opinion (Delphi method) will be obtained to ensure content validity. The final scale will be administered online to physiotherapists, and construct validity and reliability analyses will be conducted. The study aims to contribute scientifically to the determination of manual therapy application behaviors in physiotherapy practices, the understanding of clinical decision-making processes, and the measurement of behavioral intention. No risks were anticipated for the participants, and data collection was voluntary.
NCT04373135
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is affecting the way many people live their lives, including seeking medical care and maintaining good self-care to keep healthy. Additionally, in the event many people become critically ill at once, COVID-19 has the possibility of overwhelming hospitals to the point where they have to make decisions about how to determine who receives intensive care and life-support measures. Many hospitals as well as local or state governments have been working on policies to determine how to make these decisions. This study seeks to learn about how COVID-19 has affected the way patients and healthcare providers care for themselves and about their thoughts and concerns about policies that may "ration" life-support resources.
NCT04867382
The prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and opioid-related deaths has risen dramatically in recent years. Effective treatments, including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs; e.g., buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone) are under-utilized. There are few evidence-based interventions for changing attitudes toward Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) in the general public and especially among healthcare clinicians. This study proposed an innovative intervention to change attitudes of Primary Care Clinicians (PCCs) toward persons with OUD. Study participants were stratified into one of two online learning courses: the intervention training was compared with an attention-control training.
NCT02897232
This is a minimal risk, anonymous, convenience sample, social behavioral study using qualitative descriptive survey methods. It is to ascertain community member, physician, resident and medical student perspectives regarding Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection, associated diseases and to identify barriers which prevent these groups from ensuring that males 9-26 receive the three-shot vaccine series to prevent HPV infection. The research is focused on these questions: Do community members understand the ease of transmission of the HPV virus in males 9-26? Do community members, physicians, residents and medical students have knowledge of the associated diseases that may occur with the HPV virus infection in males age 9-26? Do community members, physicians, residents and medical students know the ages in which males should receive the HPV vaccine three-shot series? What barriers prevent community members and physicians, residents and medical students from ensuring that males 9-26 receive the three-shot vaccine series to prevent HPV infection?