Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-3 of 3 trials
NCT07092631
Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of colorectal cancer surgery, particularly in resource-limited and conflict-affected settings. This retrospective cohort study conducted at Damascus Hospital, Syria, evaluated patient and procedure related risk factors for anastomotic leakage following elective sigmoid colon and rectal resections. An initial cohort (January 2016-March 2024) identified modifiable risk factors that informed updates to institutional preoperative and perioperative guidelines. A follow-up cohort (April 2024-October 2025) was subsequently analyzed to assess outcomes after guideline implementation. The study demonstrates that targeted optimization, especially correction of hypoalbuminemia and improved perioperative management was associated with reduced anastomotic leakage and postoperative mortality, highlighting the value of context-specific, evidence-based guideline changes in low-resource surgical settings.
NCT06688383
This is a nationwide prospective observational study to assess the overall clinical anastomotic leakage rate after right hemicolectomy for cancer, to detect the independent risk factors for AL, and to develop a clinical prediction model to estimates of the probability of the occurrence of an AL after surgery. Since this is a multicenter prospective study, the Division of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery from the University of Turin, Department of Oncology, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano will be the Coordinator Center of the study, Ethics committee approves will be requested before the implementation of this study. Italian high-volume colorectal surgery centers members of SICO (The Italian Society of Oncological Surgery) have agreed to participate as collaborators of this study, notification and revision from their local ethics committee will be requested as well. A certified general surgeon with a large experience in the preoperative, operative, and postoperative management of patients with colorectal cancer has been identified to coordinate the study in each center. Id information of the potential collaborators is specified in the section "Trial Setting". Once the study is activated, eligible patients (or a representative) must provide written, informed consent before any study procedures occur. No intervention or modification of the habitual clinical practice is planned All data will enter into a database provided by the promoting center. There are three main sections of data collection for each patient: * Preoperative: baseline, disease and demographics. * Operative: details about the surgery, anastomosis construction and enterotomy closure. * Follow-up: outcomes data about the early (within 30 postoperative day) and late postoperative course (31 th - 60th postoperative day) and pathology report. The definition of AL is based on the presence of clinical signs (pain, fever, tachycardia, peritonitis, feculent or enteric drainage, purulent drainage, postoperative ileus, abscess, septicemia, and/or organ failure) with radiographic signs (fluid collections, gas containing collections at CT scan) suggestive of AL and-or intraoperative or autopsy findings (gross enteric spillage, anastomotic disruption). The absence of AL will be assumed by a normal postoperative course and the absence of symptoms suggestive of AL with or without radiologic confirmation.
NCT06180564
Pilot RCT with 20 patients in both test and control group. In the control group resection \& anastomosis was done using the conventional method. In the test group after devascularisation the resection line was marked on the bowel wall and IRT done using a forward looking infra- red camera with a rainbow display. Resection line was determined by a sharp change in colour on the display screen (corresponding to \> 30C change in surface temperature) over the visualised bowel wall. Margins were revised if difference between surgeon and IRT determined resection lines were more than 1cm apart. Anastomosis was done as per surgeon's preference.AL was the primary outcome measure. Hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, post-operative complications as per Clavien-Dindo classification were the secondary outcome measures.