Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-10 of 10 trials
NCT07176845
Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem in Switzerland and worldwide. Globally, LBP remains the leading cause of years lived with disability and its incidence and associated socioeconomic consequences are predicted to increase in the coming decades. In Switzerland, the condition is one of the most commonly reported physical complaints and negatively affects quality of life, resulting in significant personal burden and personal financial burden. LBP also generates enormous socioeconomic costs, with both direct and indirect costs estimated to reach billions of Swiss francs in Switzerland annually. Therefore, it is essential that LBP prevention, diagnosis, and management are improved. LBP is a multifactorial condition. Social, psychological and biophysical factors, along with comorbidities and genetic factors, influence LBP development and associated disability. In individuals with LBP, psychological factors, such as pain catastrophizing, are associated with higher pain intensity and developing chronic LBP and the associated disability. Among biophysical factors, altered spinal motor behaviour (e.g. smaller trunk movement amplitude) and reduced physical activity have been observed in LBP patients and suggested to influence LBP. However, exactly how all these factors influence LBP and how they are interrelated remains unclear. In particular, the effect of altered spinal motor behaviour on LBP is not understood. However, altered motor behaviour could play an important role in changing LBP and related disability. Therefore, improving our understanding of the patterns of spinal motor behaviour and the interrelationships with other factors in LBP would increase our understanding of LBP progression and could help improve LBP management. This study consists of a 6-month prospective longitudinal cohort observation of spinal motor behavior, physical activity, psychological factors, pain intensity, and disability in LBP patients (300 acute, 300 chronic LBP). Data collection will occur remotely and the frequency of repeated measures will be daily or weekly, depending on the measure. A custom smart-phone application will be used by participants to collect data on spinal motor behavior, psychological factors, pain intensity, and disability. Physical activity will be monitored using a wearable physical activity tracker. Established trajectories of motor behavior will be investigated for potential interrelations with trajectories of other parameters (e.g. pain, psychological factors, and disability), to explore potential causal effects. In addition, risk factors or predictive factors for certain trajectories of motor behavior and other parameters will be identified. As such, this study will allow us to investigate the temporality of these relationships and identify LBP, and in particular spinal motor behavior, phenotypes.
NCT07118033
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy approach based on the Algo-K decision algorithm in patients with subacute low back pain radiating to the lower limb. Algo-K helps select the most suitable lumbar mobilization technique according to the patient's pain response. The experimental group will receive a five-minute targeted manual therapy in addition to standard physiotherapy, while the control group will receive a non-specific mobilization. The study aims to determine whether this algorithm-guided intervention leads to faster and greater improvement in pain and disability.
NCT05001555
Phase IIIb, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the fixed combination of Desketoprofen / Vitamin B in the management of acute pain in patients with cervical sprain grade I-II of the Quebec scale.
NCT04968158
Phase IIIb, longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination of etoricoxib 90 mg and tramadol 50 mg compared with fixed-dose therapy of acetaminophen 325 mg and tramadol 37.5 mg for the management of acute low back pain.
NCT03502187
The overall objective of this project is to compare three home-managed treatment regimens for subacute low back pain: Progressive Exercise Plan (PEP), NMES (neuromuscular electrical stimulation) core strength training and standard primary care management (PCM). Each of the two treatment arms will be supplemented by Primary Care Management. The specific aim of the study is to determine whether the two treatment regimes are significantly more efficacious than standard PCM alone in improving lower back muscle strength, daily physical activity, physical function, quality of life, and symptoms associated with subacute LBP.
NCT01587274
Low back pain causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In a general low back pain (LBP) population, prognosis is poor. About 50% of patients who visited general practitioners with new onset musculoskeletal LBP report persistent pain and functional disability three months after the index visit. Outcomes are similarly poor for the population of patients forced to use an ED for management of their LBP. In an observational study of patients with non-traumatic LBP recently completed at the PI's institution, patients were contacted one week after ED discharge: 70% reported persistent back-pain related functional impairment, 59% reported moderate or severe LBP, and 69% reported analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. Three months after the ED visit, 48% reported functional impairment, 42% reported moderate or severe pain, and 46% reported analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. A variety of evidence-based medications are available to treat LBP. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are more efficacious than placebo with regard to pain relief, global improvement, and requirement of analgesic medication. Skeletal muscle-relaxants too are effective for short-term pain relief and global efficacy. Opioids are commonly used for moderate or severe acute LBP,(9) though high-quality evidence supporting this practice is lacking. Treatment of LBP with multiple concurrent medications is common in the ED setting. Emergency physicians often prescribe NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants, and opioids in combination. Several clinical trials have compared combination therapy with NSAIDS+ skeletal muscle relaxants to monotherapy with just one of these agents. These trials have reported heterogeneous results. The combination of opioids + NSAIDS has not been evaluated experimentally in patients with acute LBP. Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an ED visit for musculoskeletal LBP, the investigators propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining muscle relaxants or opioids with NSAIDs is more effective than NSAID monotherapy for the treatment of non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain. Specifically, the investigators will evaluate three distinct hypotheses: 1. The combination of naproxen + cyclobenzaprine will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen alone seven days after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris low back pain functional disability scale 2. The combination of naproxen + oxycodone/ acetaminophen will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen alone seven days after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris low back pain functional disability scale 3. The combination of naproxen + oxycodone/ acetaminophen will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen + cyclobenzaprine seven days after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris low back pain functional disability scale
NCT01708915
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Nicoboxil/Nonivamide ointment in comparison to Nicoboxil, Nonivamide, and placebo ointments for the treatment of acute low back pain.
NCT01638286
A randomized, open label, single-dose, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover study to evaluate a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac in healthy male subjects.
NCT00643383
A multi-center placebo controlled, double-blind, trial comparing the analgesic efficacy and safety of Acetram Contramid® BID versus placebo for the treatment of acute low back pain in patients between 18 and 80 yrs of age.
NCT00923429
A randomized controlled trial over a 10-week period with a two-year follow-up. The objectives were to compare effects of manual therapy in addition to the stay-active concept versus the stay-active concept only in low back pain patients recruited from primary health care. 160 outpatients with acute or subacute low back pain with or without pain radiation into the legs (70 women, 90 men, ages 20-55 years) were recruited from a geographically defined area and randomly allocated to stay-active care with or without muscle stretching, or to manual therapy with or without specific corticosteroid injections in addition to the stay-active concept. Pain, disability rating index, and sickness absence measures were used as outcome at 10-week follow-up and sickness absence was measured at two-year follow-up.