Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Lead
University of California, San Diego
With
While mechanical ventilation can be used to sustain life in those with severe ARDS, it, can further worsen lung injury or prevent lung healing resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Using ECMO, investigators may be able to minimize injury from mechanical ventilation to allow the lungs to to recover from ARDS; however, the optimal ventilator settings and therapies are unknown while on ECMO. This trial will randomize patients to personalized ventilator strategy vs. standard of care. Current ventilator guidelines while on V-V ECMO for ARDS use a one-size-fits-all approach - respiratory rate 10, driving pressure 10, and a PEEP of 10. Our central hypothesis is that personalized PEEP adjusted by measuring intrathoracic pressures via esophageal manometry (Pes) will decease ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) as assessed by biomarkers of inflammation (main outcomes IL-6 and sRAGE). To carry out these aims, participants with ARDS on V-V ECMO will be prospectively randomize patients to two groups: Control Arm: PEEP of 10 cmH2O (ECMO guidelines). Intervention Arm: PEEP guided by esophageal manometry. Both arms will have be on neuromuscular blockade, with a respiratory rate set at 10 breaths/min and a driving pressure of 10 cmH2O. In addition to biomarkers of VILI, investigators will assess differences in other physiological outcomes including pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange. Hypothesis: Personalized PEEP will have improvement in biomarkers (primary outcome - IL-6), increased oxygenation, decreased dead space, and increased respiratory compliance.
Age
18–any
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
