This is a single-center, retrospective, open-label, non-randomized cohort study based on real-world clinical data from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.
The study population will include all adult patients who underwent first-time unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2025. Patients who underwent revision arthroplasty, simultaneous bilateral arthroplasty, concomitant arthroplasty of other joints, arthroplasty for tumor or acute trauma, or who had severely incomplete data will be excluded.
Participants will be grouped according to the prosthesis brand and model documented in the operative record. Baseline variables will include age, sex, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, ASA classification, comorbidities, and preoperative knee function score. Surgery-related variables will include prosthesis brand and model, fixation method, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, surgeon seniority, use of a tourniquet, and drainage duration.
The primary outcome will be knee function score at 1 year after surgery, assessed using the HSS score or KSS score. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, functional recovery, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes at different postoperative time points. Economic outcomes will include direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, indirect costs, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Safety outcomes will include all postoperative adverse events.
The objective of this study is to comprehensively compare the medium- and long-term clinical effectiveness, safety, and economic benefits of different prosthesis brands used in TKA, and to provide evidence to support clinical prosthesis selection and healthcare resource optimization.