Cancer Literacy Education and Awareness Resources for Prostate Care

Introduction Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men worldwide and in Europe. Many men face difficult decisions about screening, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term care. These decisions often involve complex information, uncertainty about risks and benefits, and emotional stress. At the same time, many people struggle to understand medical information or to assess whether information found online is reliable. This difficulty is known as limited health literacy-the ability to find, understand, evaluate, and use health information to make decisions. Today, health literacy also includes digital health literacy, which refers to the skills needed to use digital tools, websites, and online resources related to health. Low levels of health literacy can lead to delayed diagnosis, misunderstanding of treatment options, reduced participation in shared decision-making with healthcare professionals, and inequalities in health outcomes. These challenges can be especially serious in prostate cancer, where decisions are complex and often depend on personal values and preferences. The CLEAR-PC project was created to address this challenge by developing a comprehensive strategy to improve health literacy and digital health literacy related to prostate cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment decisions, and palliative care. The study aims to help patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and the general public better understand prostate cancer and participate actively in decisions about care. Overall aim of the study The main goal of CLEAR-PC is to design, develop, and evaluate a strategy that improves health literacy and digital health literacy in prostate cancer care. This strategy will help people: Access reliable and understandable information Understand risks and benefits of screening and treatment Participate in shared decision-making with healthcare professionals Reduce misinformation and confusion Improve communication between patients and clinicians Reduce inequalities in access to information and care To achieve this, the project uses a multi-level approach that addresses: Individuals and the information they receive Healthcare professionals and healthcare organizations Social, cultural, and environmental factors that influence health decisions Participants in the study include: Members of the general population Patients with prostate cancer Caregivers and family members Healthcare professionals (such as doctors, nurses, and psychologists) Researchers and educators Policy makers and health authorities Vulnerable or underserved populations The inclusion of diverse participants helps ensure that the tools and materials developed are practical, inclusive, and relevant to real-world needs. Procedure CLEAR-PC follows an action-research and co-creation approach. Action research means that researchers do not only study a problem-they actively work with stakeholders to develop and test solutions in real settings. Co-creation means that patients, healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders participate in designing tools and strategies from the beginning, ensuring that the results are useful and easy to apply in practice. The project progresses through three main phases. Phase 1: Understanding needs and identifying gaps. The first phase focuses on understanding current levels of health literacy and identifying barriers to informed decision-making. Researchers collect information using several methods: Surveys: Large surveys are conducted among adults in several European countries to assess: Knowledge about prostate cancer Ability to understand health information Use of digital health resources Confidence in making health decisions These surveys help identify gaps in knowledge and skills and show which groups may need additional support. Focus groups: Group discussions are organized with: Patients Caregivers Healthcare professionals Members of the general population People from vulnerable or minority communities These discussions provide insights into real experiences, challenges, and information needs. Interviews Researchers also interview experts and policy makers to understand how health literacy can be improved at the healthcare system level. Review of existing tools and programs: The project reviews existing educational materials, digital tools, and training programs used in Europe and internationally to improve health literacy. This helps identify best practices and areas that need improvement. At the end of this phase, researchers have a clear picture of: Current levels of knowledge and digital skills Barriers to understanding health information Needs of patients and professionals Existing resources that can be adapted Phase 2: Designing and developing solutions In the second phase, researchers and stakeholders work together to design new tools and educational resources. These may include: Decision aids that help patients understand treatment options Educational videos and fact sheets Training programs for healthcare professionals Communication tools to explain risks and benefits clearly Digital platforms and online resources Community awareness materials These tools are tested in workshops and adapted to ensure they are understandable, culturally appropriate, and practical for different healthcare settings. The aim is to create a CLEAR-PC strategy, a structured set of tools, materials, and best practices that can be used in real healthcare environments. Phase 3: Testing the strategy in practice Once the tools are developed, they are tested in clinical settings. This phase evaluates: Whether patients better understand their condition Whether healthcare professionals communicate more effectively Whether patients feel more confident in making decisions Whether shared decision-making improves The results of this phase help refine the strategy before broader implementation. Expected results The study aims to produce several important outcomes: Reliable and accessible educational materials about prostate cancer Training programs for healthcare professionals Tools that support shared decision-making Policy recommendations to improve communication and patient support A digital library of resources Strategies to combat misinformation In the short term, the project will improve awareness and professional training. In the medium term, it will improve decision-making and communication. In the long term, it aims to reduce inequalities and improve health outcomes.